Total posts: 214
-->
@Vegasgiants
Yep! My body just completely started feeling a new attraction to females!
I totally don't still feel an attraction to males, in the back, but instead I am forcing myself to feel attraction to females. Though is that really attraction if I don't feel anything? I'm just forcing myself? I guess it doesn't matter, because I can choose!
Created:
Wow! You're telling me that I choose to feel arousal around men? I choose to feel that sexual attraction?
I can just change my sexual attraction into liking females? Like, that feeling of my sexual attraction and orientation to men will just disappear?
Thanks for telling, I'll just change how my body consciously and unconsciously reacts! This was sooo helpful!
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
"I also notice that almost all transgender people who do not detransition all have other significant mental disorders or emotional damage whereas most sissy/femboy men or severely butch tomboys etc are generally very mentally stable and own their identity even sometimes admitting they get off on being misgendered for roleplay as they feel so extremely femme or masc but knowing their sex and thus gender can not truly change, only their expression of it."
I guess your not wrong..
Created:
This was the best guide, thank you!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheApprentice
You're alright.
Yeah, i'm good on con with that.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheApprentice
Personally, I wanted: "The teaching of religious studies is necessary in public schools as part of a well-rounded education. (10 points. Max Time - 3 days"
I don't know if it was a misunderstanding or was purposely changed.
But as for the topic I just mentioned ^^^^^, yes, con.
Are you willing to do that topic? If not, I can compromise.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Devon
First comment: Yes, this is tournament related. Five points.
Second: I was originally going to pick that topic, it was a tough decision between the two. But looks like you had the right feeling, lol. Glad you picked it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Devon
I have no problem with the current judges, and would have no problem with any other judges you may request.
Are you willing to create the debate?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
Even though I prefered a topic, am I still able to debate someone in the meanwhile/with that topic still in place? Or do we have to wait till someone accepts or its allow to become an open topic?
If so, i'm willing to debate Devon on that topic.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
Alright, so..
"Mention below which topic you’d like to choose."
Regarding what topic I would like to choose:
- The teaching of religious studies is necessary in public schools as part of a well-rounded education.
Unsure if we are putting our preferred position on that, so, i'll leave it there.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
Gender dysphoria is a strong sense of feeling.
Transgender people don't need to have a strong sense of those particular thoughts/feelings in order to be transgender.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
Wrong.
Being transgender (just trans) is not a medical condition, gender dysphoria is.
Gender dysphoria was once Gender Identity Disorder. It was changed for the obvious reasons; dysphoria relates to distress and not how you identify.
Being transgender does not mean you have gender dysphoria.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
I know this is a conversation between you and them, however, not all trans people feel that discomfort or emotional pain in themselves.
They don't even need to change their original bodies to express they are transgender.
Gender dysphoria does not apply to all transgender people, that is the above and beyond.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Mind you, I would never claim that women dominate Nursing, Teaching, Social work, Human resources, Event planning, Public relations, (PR)Marketing and advertising, Healthcare administration, Nonprofit organizations, Psychology and counseling because they are treated better than men.
I never claimed that nor thought about that. But nothing about them dominating in certain work fields is about being treated better than men, it has no relation.
I don't know if people think it's about the want to dominate in more work fields, I don't know if that's the entirety of the goal. That will never happen, population is unequal with both sexes. But I do believe their still is some sexism that may not even allow them to work in certain fields, (sometimes). But this isn't the main goal, I have already stated the main goal.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
Yeah, okay. No it doesn't.
I've already explained the differences between a feminist and a psudeo-feminist. That's what you tend to see now days, psudeo-feminism.
Nor is this about equaling the same jobs that men and woman do. Men and woman in population aren't even equal, that's impossible. Everyone picks their own job, and woman should not be forced to equal out something just because men want to do that job. What if woman wanted to equal out a certain work field they dominate in? There is no need for that, even I agree with that.
Feminism is not about equaling the same amount of jobs of the sexes, it's gender equality. When was gender equality meaning they were forced to work a certain job just because men are in that work field more?
As for "they will get equal pay if they keep up", I find that silly. Females have already worked jobs that are in the same work field, and they can work even harder, but the gender wage gap is still there. It doesn't matter how hard they work, full time and year round, they won't get payed as much.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
It's a goal, but it's a long term goal, same thing goes with the "fight" about racism.
As a goal, it might not happen completely but still may achieve things to get closer to that goal.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Rieka
I don't think you understood the joke as I meant it.
You seriously are upset about people calling themselves girlbosses when that's not even a belief of feminism, just something simply self-loving. Some people simply find there selves proud of doing something, and they are aloud. Why are you upset about it? Sometimes its even just used as a joke. What does this have to do with anything?
I don't even have to explain sexism or where it is, it's clear it still exists everywhere around the world.
Like I said before, feminism is for equality with men and woman. That's all there is to it.
I could even debate this topic, but its simply your looking for the wrong types of feminism. Some I can't even call feminism.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Rieka
I know they say they want equality for both genders, but feminism really only promotes females within itself - defeating that moral.
Feminism promotes females you say? You mean when they are fighting for the wage gap? You mean the sexism with multiple areas, such as politics?
You mean them saying they want to be treated socially equal?
They are promoting the change that help promote females to be treated equally. Crazy, huh?
Such as with anything, you promote what needs to be changed. Females need to be treated equally regardless of what's in their pants.
Everybody is a girlboss now, whether they care or not! They slay for doing basic everyday things and being abnormal!
I can't help but laugh.
I see no problem with people calling themselves "girlboss", are you jealous?
It's called a little self love here and there! You can learn!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
My bad forgot to mention. The above ^^^^^.
Created:
Posted in:
The problem is that "standards" are anything but.Women's Basketball says the standard is dribbling a ball for 40 minutes. They should get paid for the same amount of dribbles as the men do.Only a feminist would agree to this statement. Work output isn't measured in bean counting. Quality matters.
I was just about to say it wasn't measured that way, but you beat me to it.
Anyways, my point being is men are getting treated better just because they are males. Everything you are defining is not the cases in lots of scenarios, it's because they are males. Not because its their quality, etc.
The actual fact of the matter is that no man would be hirable if they demanded more pay for the same work, and would quickly be replaced by a woman who would work and provide the same exact work output for less pay. Regardless whether the boss is a man or a woman, the bottom line matters more than what is between your legs.
I can see that LOL.
Even education can't outweigh the gap.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
That's where multiple people get it wrong.
It isn't about making woman and men equally physically stronger or both genders to be able to give birth.
Gender equality in law and in practice is what feminism is defined for, aka, social, political and economic equality of both sexes. Not anything like what you're defining.
It isn't about being smarter, having the same smartness, its about like I said, social, political and economic equality. This means, no biased and sexist votes with woman on the board. Not being treated differently just by the way they are a different sex. Same pay rate for the same job, regardless of their gender.
They are females, that doesn't mean they are any less than a man; they shouldn't be treated wrongly. That's the problem.
Created:
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
To be fair, with this topic, I am not biased towards Nyxified. I see Public-Choice's side more.
Both sides are good but I agree with Public-Choice to a degree. Identifying versus classifying are completely different in my book.
I draw a thin line to certain things with transgender people. I don't know if I could classify them as woman, but I see both sides.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
I get his point. But in back of my mind, i'm really questioning the same thing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Though I wasn't mentioned, I assume this was directed towards me?
Still doesn't matter.. It exists, and controversally, it shouldn't even with your reasoning.
One can work the same job, same hours, complete the same "standards" and still a wage gap.
In fact, someone (female) could be the boss of their employee and the employee can still get paid more. Now if he was the boss, it would've been different.
It doesn't matter the reasoning behind it, it's still an (baised) inequality. That's what feminism is for: calling out the inequalities and fighting against it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Wrong context.
Gender wage gap; they want same pay. Gender equality.
Not in the means of physical ability comparing the two, etc.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Rieka
Simply, gender (or sex) equality and double standards.
Or do you want me to get a bit more specific revolving around it?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DavidAZ
Feminism does in no way, prove a man is better nor is that the entirety of it all. Feminism does however say that men are getting treated better and they want change. Which revolves around sexism, of course. That's what needs to be changed. I don't know where the idea of "proving a man is better" comes from, that's the exact opposite or partially the opposite.
Gender wage gap for example. Woman aren't saying men are better, but they are saying, men are getting treated better than us which needs to be changed. Politics as another example goes without explanation. It's the biased and discriminatory means that are the problem.
They aren't trying to be a man. Nobody said they want to be a man. They want to be treated equally. Such as someone of color wants to be treated equally but doesn't want to be white.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
There are different "types" of feminism, but really they all hold the same ideal.
When you group them "all together" in the end, it's still gender equality.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Rieka
Feminism stays the same. Claiming they are feminists, when they truly aren't by definition, makes them not a feminst. What you're defining is pseudo-feminism. You seem to confuse the two.
If anything has drifted away, it's the impression of feminism for many. But what a feminst is stays, no matter the fake impressions of a feminst.
"They want to be the hierarchy", if that's the case they aren't a feminst. Like I said people interview the stupidest females who claim they are a feminist, but aren't. I already stated the actual term for what you're defining.
Feminists do want equality with both sexes, that is the only true type of feminism.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Rieka
You guys seem to assume what feminists are or what they truly stand for.
Some woman call themselves feminists but aren't 'true' feminists. I see videos all the time interviewing woman and they gather the stupidist woman to be interviewed. You got to find the right ones otherwise you're simply calling out knockoff feminists. Saying actual feminsts are "all borderline narcissistic" is naive.
You don't understand what a 'real feminist' is if your calling them narcissistic for being a feminist.
Created:
-->
@Savant
I can't help but laugh right now... LOL.
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
You right.
Created:
I really cant with posts like this, LOL.
"You guys" choose a great president.
Created:
-->
@AustinL0926
So.. if so, whats the steps? If any?
I guess we can complain about this, but were not doing anything.
Good stuff in your post and all, but I dont quite see the entire point. Unless your suggesting the removal of his position. But I find that unlikely (to a degree, if you know).
All I can really say is, my schedule has multiple fluctuations. Same as his, most likely. Maybe he needs time.
I'm willing to give time, at least considering the fact that trying to gain more users, is unlikely to a degree. Debating just happens to be more unknown, usually to younger groups and still, older groups. I know very little people in my life that like to debate. If people want to debate, they'll look it up. If they don't want dedication or debate at all, they wont. If anything, it just has to show up closely to the top of the pages.
After all, that's how I found debate.org. I wanted to debate, I looked, I debated.
I wasn't going to comment initially, but I really don't know if these posts are for the actual interest in the site, or like you said, for attention.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Repeat:
"It's not particularly mentioned either, but physical maturity is hinted in the Bible.
Giving us emphasis on the idea."
Old enough for love is 'somewhat' stated.
As I said, not particularly mentioned. Usually it differs from family to family on how they precieve it, but it's still hinted.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Still wrong.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
It's not particularly mentionded either, but physical maturity is hinted in the Bible.
Giving us emphasis on the idea.
Also this topic never said married, I just assumed a child and adult having sex. One night stand, if that's more specific.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
As said, its not directly mentioned.
But one of a few different popular quotes from the Bible:
“Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him if a great millstone were hung around his neck and he were thrown into the sea."
-Luke
So, what can we infer from this? But no, it's not directly talked about. At least not that I know of.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
I don't think there is anything direct from the Bible. However, there are many quotes from the Bible that show (support) against it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Maybe. Usually it's left in the air.
Only one person accepted, Best.Korea. Otherwise they would most likely run out of time.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Well now who's going to debate me on controversial homosexual arguments..?
Besides that, had a nice time debating on your views. Thanks for my first debate on this site. Cya around.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
I honestly think that at this point that's all they can think of.
Yet I don't see them complaining over National Dount day in the United States.
Created:
Posted in:
I don't know why people get so fired up about LGBTQ+ celebrations. It's a few days, and a month. What about it?
It's not bothering you, and if it is, why? Why do you even care.
If you don't like it, cool, don't engage in activities around it.
It's (almost) like any association with other months like Womans Right month.
Created:
My only problem with it is one or two typos = -legibility point
I don't think structure should be factored in. People do it differently sometimes and if three people vote for their 'better structure' that's already worth an argument point. This is especially regarding new users, how are they supposed to know that?
Created: