Total debates: 15
Pro will argue that science and the existence of God are capable of being reconciled. Con will argue that either science or God disproves the other.
No description has been provided
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is educational: I read up on this topic and found a given argument that I will lend from; aimed at criticising the given argument.
I am claiming both that math is an art and that math is not a science
Okay, so the topic is as clear as it is
In this debate I will argue that the rise of artificial intelligence is positive for humanity.
In this debate, I will argue for the existence of God, while the contender argues for the non-existent nature of God.
I (kouen) will argue that the USA can't try to invade China and succeed(less than 50% chance) while the opponent will argue that if the USA tries to invade China, USA is likely(higher than 50% chance) to succeed. "Succeed" being : USA captures Beijing/Peking (the capital)
I (Kouen) will defend that professional athletes are not overpaid, while the opponent will defend that professional athletes are overpaid
I argue that chess is a sport while the opponent argues that chess isn't a sport
Hulk hogan should apologize and be held responsible for his attack on the twin towers.