How many people will lose healthcare because of Trump?
It's so funny that Marxists feverishly claim that the worker should keep what he produces, yet is all on board for 40% taxation
Well, I guess Communism in USA is doomed.
Its back to more of free market economy.
How many people will lose healthcare because of Trump?
I am not a marxist. I am a Communist.
Also, the definition of Communism is government providing food, water, education, housing and healthcare to all citizens so that all citizens and all children have same chance and arent left out by the system.
So yes, democracy is the path to Communism. Get used to it.
It's so funny that Marxists feverishly claim that the worker should keep what he produces, yet is all on board for 40% taxation....
Unfortunately, this isn't true.
The United States has never employed a "free market economy." The United States has been a quasi-communist state for over a century
Do you mean subsidized health-care insurance? Hopefully, many.
The definition of Communism is the state's controlling and coercing the means of production and the dissemination of goods and services. Your specious description is undermined by historical practice
Can't argue against that.
I would counter and say we live in a quasi-fascist state, and not a quasi-communist state
Communism and fascism would be identical if it were not for the concept of a property deed.I would counter and say we live in a quasi-fascist state, and not a quasi-communist state...
So Communism wins.
Hopefully? You are such a capitalist.
Errr wrong. Thats not my definition.
Also, Capitalism is undermined by historical practice
since all strong countries are Communist,
such as Canada(free healthcare).
So Communism wins again.
While the individual and his/her liberty loses.
Never stated that it was your definition. I adjusted your response to reflect a more accurate description.
Don't you mean "more coercive"?
There's no such thing as "free" health care.
At the expense of the individual and his/her liberty.
Yes.
I am glad you concede that the definition you used was irrelevant to anything I said,
since it is not the definition I use and its meaning has nothing to do with what I am saying.
More coercive, better military, more sustainable, historically proven to work... take your pick.
Sure there is. If I give you a banana, you got a banana for free, since you didnt pay for it. Thats Communism.
Yes.BecauseCommunism =/= freedomCommunism = 💪💪💪💪
So you have abandoned that Communism facilitates individual sovereignty? Honesty is good.
Your definition was inaccurate.
I pick "more coercive" since it's the only one on your itemized list that has been substantiated
And how was the procurement of this banana financed?
The definition is used for meaning.
changing definition still doesnt change the meaning and still doesnt refute the argument.
You already conceded that USA, China, Russia... are all Communist countries.
Irrelevant to you, since you got banana for free, without paying for it. Lucky you
OMG, is Greyparrot, Don Jr.?
The cackling hens claim Trump is destroying the world,
I wish there was a mandatory class for students named "the work habits of a government employee"
