Name One Wrong Thing That Jesus Did

Author: Best.Korea

Posts

Total: 123
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,647
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Barney
Jesus came back multiple times to his disciples. You have to give me the verse in order for me to know which part are you talking about.
Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,615
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@Best.Korea
Name One Wrong Thing That Jesus Did. 

He underestimated the Galilean zealots.
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,514
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@Best.Korea
Jesus never said he was God. A Christian sect made that story up, but not all the sects after Jesus' death stated such a ridiculous statement.
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,514
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
Jesus, on the other hand, commited several errors, like trusting on Judas, for example. If he knew Judas was going to betrayed him, why the fuck Jesus let him be his disciple? 😆


Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,647
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Stephen
@IlDiavolo
When I said one wrong thing, I meant morally wrong thing. Forgot to state it that way.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,647
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@IlDiavolo
If he knew Judas was going to betrayed him, why the fuck Jesus let him be his disciple?
To help spread the message, I guess. It says in the Bible that Jesus had to die so that others may believe.

Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,615
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@Best.Korea
Name One Wrong Thing That Jesus Did. 

He underestimated the Galilean zealots.

When I said one wrong thing, I meant morally wrong thing. Forgot to state it that way.

I see. Ok , he put his trust in a bunch of cut-throat bandits and criminal Zealots from Galilee.
rosends
rosends's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 806
3
2
6
rosends's avatar
rosends
3
2
6
-->
@Best.Korea
It makes sense, since Jews expected that if someone can be saved, it would be just them. They believe they are chosen people.
Except Judaism doesn't have the idea of being "saved" for anyone. You clearly misunderstand the idea of the "chosen" idea.
In the Bible, there was an entire section dedicated to God convincing disciples to give teachings (Bible) to non-Jews.
Not in my bible there isn't.
You are confusing what Jews think today with what Jews thought back then.
You are confusing the gospel and church versions of Judaism was and is with what it actually was and is.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,647
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@rosends
Except Judaism doesn't have the idea of being "saved" for anyone. 
You misunderstand what "if" means.

rosends
rosends's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 806
3
2
6
rosends's avatar
rosends
3
2
6
-->
@Best.Korea
you wrote "since Jews expected that if someone can be saved, it would be just them"

The conditional "if" in your sentence comes after the statement, "Jews expected".

There was no such expectation so the conditional is immaterial to the discussion.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,647
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@rosends
There was no such expectation
Its literally in the Bible.

Acts 11
"Soon the news reached the apostles and other believers in Judea that the Gentiles had received the word of God. But when Peter arrived back in Jerusalem, the Jewish believers criticized him.  “You entered the home of Gentiles and even ate with them!” they said."

Acts 10
"The Jewish believers who came with Peter were amazed that the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles, too."

“You know it is against our laws for a Jewish man to enter a Gentile home like this or to associate with you. But God has shown me that I should no longer think of anyone as impure or unclean."
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,647
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@rosends
You are confusing the gospel and church versions of Judaism was and is with what it actually was and is.
If you want to discuss this outside of the Bible, then I have no interest. I am saying what the Bible says, not what your interpretation of Judaism is.

rosends
rosends's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 806
3
2
6
rosends's avatar
rosends
3
2
6
-->
@Best.Korea
So in other words, not in the bible. Just in the Christian gospels. Thanks.
rosends
rosends's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 806
3
2
6
rosends's avatar
rosends
3
2
6
-->
@Best.Korea
My "interpretation" is what Judaism is. Your gospel version is full of errors.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,647
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@rosends
Oh fine. If you dont want to consider Christian Bible as valid, thats your choice. I have no interest in attacking Judaism on its own grounds. That would require me to research its books throughout history, which is not the price I am willing to pay.
rosends
rosends's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 806
3
2
6
rosends's avatar
rosends
3
2
6
-->
@Best.Korea
If you don't want to do the research then you should exercise caution when making claims that misrepresent what you haven't researched.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,647
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@rosends
Caution is unnecessary. There is no need to research Judaism. Judaism is not a significant enemy.
b9_ntt
b9_ntt's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 276
0
2
5
b9_ntt's avatar
b9_ntt
0
2
5
-->
@RationalMadman
Trump Refuses Involvement in Criminal Investigations: 'I Did Nothing Wrong'
By Aila Slisco On 11/18/22 at 7:13 PM EST, Newsweek
He also argued that he "did nothing wrong" regarding January 6, suggesting that the Capitol rioters were protesting "peacefully and patriotically."
Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,615
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@rosends
@Best.Korea
If you don't want to do the research then you should exercise caution when making claims that misrepresent what you haven't researched.

10/10

RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@b9_ntt
Find a good remix
Barney
Barney's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 3,463
5
9
10
Barney's avatar
Barney
5
9
10
-->
@Best.Korea
Which verse? I cant seem to find what you are talking about.
The second coming of Christ and the apocalypse would be within their generation:
  • Matthew 24:34
  • Mark 13:30
  • Luke 21:32

I was mistaken referring to this as after he died, but it’s widely accepted that he was speaking of when he would return from heaven (aka, the cigarette store).

And in case no one has pointed it out: he also lied about being the Jewish messiah (while he is the Christian messiah, he failed to live up to standards for the Jewish messiah).
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,074
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Best.Korea
Nope.

Jesus traipsed around the Arabian Peninsular for 30 years or so with his boyfriends.

And then got nailed to a post by the Roman authorities......So he must have done something wrong.

And then his boyfriends wrote some tall tales about him.



ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,920
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
Jesus is character is sci-fi fantasy land novel called the bible. No more no less.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,647
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Barney
  • Matthew 24:34
  • Mark 13:30
  • Luke 21:32
"Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened."

All those things did happen. Jesus came back again, multiple times. He even appeared in Acts.

I dont think Matthew 24:34 talks about the apocalypse. Rather, it states what will happen during life of his disciples. And it all did happen.

For example, "the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light" happened while Jesus was on a cross: 

"From noon until three in the afternoon darkness came over all the land. About three in the afternoon Jesus cried out in a loud voice, “Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani?” (which means “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”)."
rosends
rosends's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 806
3
2
6
rosends's avatar
rosends
3
2
6
-->
@Best.Korea
Caution is unnecessary. There is no need to research Judaism. Judaism is not a significant enemy.
But ignorance is. 
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,647
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@rosends
We are all ignorant about something, since having all knowledge and reading all books is impossible. It is a waste of time to research Judaism, since Judaism is not significant for literally anything. Better to research something useful instead.
rosends
rosends's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 806
3
2
6
rosends's avatar
rosends
3
2
6
-->
@Best.Korea
is isn't significant if you use it as a basis for understanding your own scriptures? Really?
TWS1405_2
TWS1405_2's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 2,186
3
3
7
TWS1405_2's avatar
TWS1405_2
3
3
7
Live 
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,647
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@rosends
The only scripture that I like is The New Testament. All the significant parts of The New Testament are understood easily and dont require Judaism. In fact, judging by what you said here before, Judaism is a contradiction to The New Testament.
rosends
rosends's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 806
3
2
6
rosends's avatar
rosends
3
2
6
-->
@Best.Korea
You see Judaism as the contradiction and not the gospels as contradicting what already existed? OK then, best of luck with that.