Just Give Us One Miracle

Author: YouFound_Lxam

Posts

Total: 102
Vegasgiants
Vegasgiants's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 1,327
3
3
2
Vegasgiants's avatar
Vegasgiants
3
3
2
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
You are just repeating a fallacy over and over.

Time has had no end.....why must it have a start?
Vegasgiants
Vegasgiants's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 1,327
3
3
2
Vegasgiants's avatar
Vegasgiants
3
3
2
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
You seem to think if you say it then it must be true 

I'll try that


SOMETHING CAN ALWAYS HAVE EXISTED


Hey... that works.  Lol 
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
-->
@Intelligence_06
Well, we agree on the fact that neither us nor the entire scientific community really "know" what big bang actually is.
I know what it is. It is the beginning of the universe. And explosion that God spoke into existence. 




ludofl3x
ludofl3x's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,071
3
2
2
ludofl3x's avatar
ludofl3x
3
2
2
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
I know what it is. It is the beginning of the universe. And explosion that God spoke into existence. 

Okay, where did the god come from? 
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
-->
@Vegasgiants
Prove it

Why can't something have always existed?
I literally just told you. 
Do you actually read my arguments?

The reason why you can't have something that has always existed, is because it would be a paradox to say so. 
If you have something that has always existed forever and ever, that would make that thing a living paradox, because that thing wouldn't not have a beginning. 
And we know that everything must have a beginning to exist. 
So, something that never had a beginning, never existed. 


Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
We used to think that earthquakes, tsunamis, floods, droughts, etc. are caused by the God. Now we know natural disasters are just matters moving around in extreme ways.

The point is, you calling this a god-involving miracle is not distinguishable from any other label of ignorance. We can't "prove" what the God is like, it is quite the opposite: what God is like depends on what we have now, and God just fills in the rest that we can't explain. We can't just assume there is a God without proof, and I do not think that is sufficient proof of God and God's miracles.

Do you think that is enough proof?
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
-->
@ludofl3x
Okay, where did the god come from? 
God is infinite. He is not bound by the laws of science that he created. Therefore, it is possible for him to be infinite.
Vegasgiants
Vegasgiants's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 1,327
3
3
2
Vegasgiants's avatar
Vegasgiants
3
3
2
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
No it would not.  It has simply always existed.  There is no paradox

Why MUST something have a beginning?  Several theories of a infinite universe exist such as string theory

You simply repeat a fallacy over and over
Vegasgiants
Vegasgiants's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 1,327
3
3
2
Vegasgiants's avatar
Vegasgiants
3
3
2
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
So is the universe.  Point to me when nothing existed
ludofl3x
ludofl3x's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,071
3
2
2
ludofl3x's avatar
ludofl3x
3
2
2
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
God is infinite. He is not bound by the laws of science that he created. Therefore, it is possible for him to be infinite.
Ok, so this is what's known special pleading, of course. Nothing can be infinite, except for this one thing I require to be infinite in order for my position to make sense. 

Which god are you talking about and why that one?
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
-->
@Vegasgiants
No it would not.  It has simply always existed.  There is no paradox

Why MUST something have a beginning?  Several theories of a infinite universe exist such as string theory

You simply repeat a fallacy over and over

You literally just denied everything I said with no arguement as to why.
Ignorance is on you. 
Vegasgiants
Vegasgiants's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 1,327
3
3
2
Vegasgiants's avatar
Vegasgiants
3
3
2
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
You make a claim with no evidence 

The claim is everything must have a beginning 


Prove it


It's a fallacy you repeat over and over
Reece101
Reece101's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,973
3
2
2
Reece101's avatar
Reece101
3
2
2
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
You literally just denied everything I said with no arguement as to why.
Ignorance is on you. 
It’s okay to admit what you don’t know. Just like you don’t know if there’s a dragon in my garage.
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
It couldn't have always existed, because again, something cannot come from nothing, so at some point, that something had to of come from something. 
IF something cannot come from nothing THEN something must have always existed 

Everything that currently makes up the universe in an infinitely hot dense point is something. Maybe that is what existed before (if before is even the right word). I have no reason to surmise anything else did since I have no real evidence for anything else.

Do you have any specific reason to believe that the (whatever would eventually evolve into the universe) did not simply always exist? Do you have any evidence to suggest anything else existed in (whatever passed for time before the big bang)?

Since thus effects the very first premise of your argument I really think we should finish clearing this specific point up before moving on.
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
-->
@secularmerlin
IF something cannot come from nothing THEN something must have always existed
I see your point, and it's a good one at that. 

Don't get me wrong, from what I have heard you are an intellectual thinker, and I am very intrigued in this conversation.

Anyways, back to my point.
Your right. Something cannot come from nothing, therefore something had to of always existed. I agree with this premise. 

When it comes to physical things, using basic logic, there had to be a time where nothing existed, because something cannot come from nothing, therefore there had to be a time where physically nothing existed.

What has always existed, is God. You are right. Something had to always exist. And that thing is God.


Vegasgiants
Vegasgiants's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 1,327
3
3
2
Vegasgiants's avatar
Vegasgiants
3
3
2
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Why?  Why can't a physical thing have always existed in some form?

There is no science behind your argument 
Vegasgiants
Vegasgiants's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 1,327
3
3
2
Vegasgiants's avatar
Vegasgiants
3
3
2
-->
@secularmerlin
There is no reason to believe matter has not always existed as there is no evidence for the creation of matter
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
there had to be a time where physically nothing existed.
How do you know this? I have no reason specifically to take your word for it.

Also while I am prepared to accept that something cannot spontaneously begin to exist for the purpose of this conversation I am not necessarily convinced in my personal philosophy That it would be a total impossibility. From the available evidence I have equal reason to suspect that something at some time some thing spontaneously began to exist (possibly at the same moment in which time began to exist) as to believe in any instigating force. None at all.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
This is so easy to turn on you in 3... 2...

Which miracle made God and how was that miracle conjured, instigated and implemented?

Thank you. You are dumbfounded and cannot reply, it's okay. Concede with dignity.
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@Vegasgiants
Any speculation about what happened before the big bang is just that including the speculation that there even was a before. 
Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,615
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
It couldn't have always existed, because again, something cannot come from nothing, so at some point, that something had to of come from something. 

So where did god come from?
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,512
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
The Big Bang theory is just a hypothesis as well as the theory of evolution.
Sir.Lancelot
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Debates: 182
Posts: 807
4
6
9
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Sir.Lancelot
4
6
9
God utilized the creation of the Earth through pre-existing matter. Jesus was technically the one who created the Earth, but it was under God's command and supervision.
Deb-8-a-bull
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,205
3
2
3
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Deb-8-a-bull
3
2
3

Can god create "something" from "nothing."  ? 

If god "built" the entire universe " here", what do reckon he built over there.?
Vegasgiants
Vegasgiants's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 1,327
3
3
2
Vegasgiants's avatar
Vegasgiants
3
3
2
-->
@IlDiavolo
Well actually nothing is proven in science 
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
-->
@secularmerlin
How do you know this? I have no reason specifically to take your word for it.
Ok:
In order for something to exist, it first must be created right? 
So, before it was created, it did not exist. It wasn't created yet.
That means in order for the matter, and space that caused the Big Bang to exist, it had to be created. 
That also means that before it was created, there was nothing there, meaning there was absolutely nothing. Nothing existed. 

Also while I am prepared to accept that something cannot spontaneously begin to exist for the purpose of this conversation I am not necessarily convinced in my personal philosophy That it would be a total impossibility. From the available evidence I have equal reason to suspect that something at some time some thing spontaneously began to exist (possibly at the same moment in which time began to exist) as to believe in any instigating force. None at all.
So, you believe that something began to exist from nothing? 



YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
-->
@RationalMadman
Which miracle made God and how was that miracle conjured, instigated and implemented?
I have answered this question in this forum over a thousand times.
Read through some of the people who have asked that question. 


secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
In order for something to exist, it first must be created right? 
Can you demonstrate that this is necessarily true? It would in fact appear as though most things in the universe were not created at all but simply came about through natural processes and even those things which are "created" by humans are upon second reflection actually just a reconfiguration of already existing things.

Also while I am prepared to accept that something cannot spontaneously begin to exist for the purpose of this conversation I am not necessarily convinced in my personal philosophy That it would be a total impossibility. From the available evidence I have equal reason to suspect that something at some time some thing spontaneously began to exist (possibly at the same moment in which time began to exist) as to believe in any instigating force. None at all.

So, you believe that something began to exist from nothing? 
If you will read what I wrote again carefully you will see that I very clearly stated that I have no reason to believe that. 
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
-->
@secularmerlin
Can you demonstrate that this is necessarily true? It would in fact appear as though most things in the universe were not created at all but simply came about through natural processes and even those things which are "created" by humans are upon second reflection actually just a reconfiguration of already existing things.
Most thing in the universe had a cause that created them.
Thats what I mean when I say creation. 

Metals didn't just pop into existence. The building blocks of life, plus some explosions were the cause. 

If you will read what I wrote again carefully you will see that I very clearly stated that I have no reason to believe that. 
So, you just don't believe either. You just don't know. 


RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Try answering the exact question I asked, you will realise the structure of it is different and entraps you even more by backfiring the logic of your very original post.

Answer what I asked, directly:

Which miracle made God and how was that miracle conjured, instigated and implemented?