Pissing off Feminists is a New Hobby of Mine

Author: Rieka

Posts

Total: 95
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,071
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Rieka
Pissing on would be more fun.
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@sadolite
The best words I could use are "adolescent angst"
that’s what you mean by life as an all or nothing existence?

That makes no sense.


zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,071
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Life occurs one moment at a time.

And in that moment it is all.

Because in the nex.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
sadolite
sadolite's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,170
3
2
4
sadolite's avatar
sadolite
3
2
4
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Its not my problem you don't get what I am saying.
Rieka
Rieka's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 131
0
2
6
Rieka's avatar
Rieka
0
2
6
-->
@zedvictor4
Not exactly sure what you mean by that.
Bella3sp
Bella3sp's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 214
1
4
9
Bella3sp's avatar
Bella3sp
1
4
9
-->
@Rieka
You guys seem to assume what feminists are or what they truly stand for.

Some woman call themselves feminists but aren't 'true' feminists. I see videos all the time interviewing woman and they gather the stupidist woman to be interviewed. You got to find the right ones otherwise you're simply calling out knockoff feminists. Saying actual feminsts are "all borderline narcissistic" is naive.

You don't understand what a 'real feminist' is if your calling them narcissistic for being a feminist.
Rieka
Rieka's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 131
0
2
6
Rieka's avatar
Rieka
0
2
6
-->
@Bella3sp
I understand that feminism is supposed to stand for equality for both genders, but it has far drifted away from what it first was. Modern day feminism is nothing like it originally started out as.

I'm not calling them narcissistic for being a feminist, but many that happen to be feminists are narcissistic and superficial. There are women out there who think they're literal 10s, and are 3s at best. 

It seems as if all feminists aren't real feminists then, since it's evident by the things they say and their actions that they don't want equality for men and women. They want to be the hierarchy, and have men blindly serve them. I haven't seen an actual woman claim to be a feminist and actually show she wants equality, and not just special treatment. 
Bella3sp
Bella3sp's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 214
1
4
9
Bella3sp's avatar
Bella3sp
1
4
9
-->
@Rieka
Feminism stays the same. Claiming they are feminists, when they truly aren't by definition, makes them not a feminst. What you're defining is pseudo-feminism. You seem to confuse the two.

If anything has drifted away, it's the impression of feminism for many. But what a feminst is stays, no matter the fake impressions of a feminst.

"They want to be the hierarchy", if that's the case they aren't a feminst. Like I said people interview the stupidest females who claim they are a feminist, but aren't. I already stated the actual term for what you're defining.

Feminists do want equality with both sexes, that is the only true type of feminism.





Rieka
Rieka's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 131
0
2
6
Rieka's avatar
Rieka
0
2
6
-->
@Bella3sp
May I know the basis and morals of actual feminism is, then?
sadolite
sadolite's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,170
3
2
4
sadolite's avatar
sadolite
3
2
4
-->
@Rieka
"May I know the basis and morals of actual feminism is, then?" Don't hold your breath waiting while waiting for that answer. LOL Your going to get some kind of "feminism is different for everyone" answer. You are supposed to instinctively know what each individual woman's idea and definition  of feminism is.
DavidAZ
DavidAZ's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 345
1
2
8
DavidAZ's avatar
DavidAZ
1
2
8
-->
@Rieka
Feminism actually proves that being a man is better.  The feminist's mind is so stuck on demanding that they be treated like a man.  They are just as good as a man.  They are always reaching up to become what a man is or has to become.  They are always trying to be a man.  Why?  Because a man is better (in their mind).  It's a terrible over-compensation for their own egos.  Poor woman needed a good daddy.

To clarify, I believe that men and women have different roles, but a man cannot be a woman and a woman cannot be a man.  Put them together in their correct roles and they can overcome anything.   
Bella3sp
Bella3sp's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 214
1
4
9
Bella3sp's avatar
Bella3sp
1
4
9
-->
@sadolite
There are different "types" of feminism, but really they all hold the same ideal. 
When you group them "all together" in the end, it's still gender equality.
Bella3sp
Bella3sp's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 214
1
4
9
Bella3sp's avatar
Bella3sp
1
4
9
-->
@DavidAZ
Feminism does in no way, prove a man is better nor is that the entirety of it all. Feminism does however say that men are getting treated better and they want change. Which revolves around sexism, of course. That's what needs to be changed. I don't know where the idea of "proving a man is better" comes from, that's the exact opposite or partially the opposite.


Gender wage gap for example. Woman aren't saying men are better, but they are saying, men are getting treated better than us which needs to be changed. Politics as another example goes without explanation. It's the biased and discriminatory means that are the problem.


They aren't trying to be a man. Nobody said they want to be a man. They want to be treated equally. Such as someone of color wants to be treated equally but doesn't want to be white. 
Bella3sp
Bella3sp's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 214
1
4
9
Bella3sp's avatar
Bella3sp
1
4
9
-->
@Rieka
Simply, gender (or sex) equality and double standards.

Or do you want me to get a bit more specific revolving around it?
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,978
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@DavidAZ
Men are the masters of the "How" to do things.
Women are the masters of the "Why" to do things.

Most of the greatest Male achievements were done for women.

Without women, Men would just sit in the mancave all day long.

Without men, women would struggle just to exist since women represent less than 1 percent of critical drudgery work like sanitation, power generation, and raw resource collecting.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,978
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Bella3sp
Simply, gender equality 
Genders are inherently unequal. Otherwise there would be one gender.
Bella3sp
Bella3sp's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 214
1
4
9
Bella3sp's avatar
Bella3sp
1
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
Wrong context. 

Gender wage gap; they want same pay. Gender equality.
Not in the means of physical ability comparing the two, etc.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,978
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
men are getting treated better than us

One of the least desirable people in America right now is a straight white man, encouraging people who can pass as non white to avoid being white, if they can get away with passing for a woman, they choose that as well. 

The wage  gap will always exist because women are not biologically wired to work hard to impress men. Men are wired the other way.

Some radicalized feminists actually do believe that men respect their hard work, but there is no man that chooses a life partner based on their earning potential.
Yet the opposite is most definitely true as no women will choose a life partner who has no earning potential.

The incentives are completely different, so a wage gap will always exist if wages are related to work output.



Bella3sp
Bella3sp's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 214
1
4
9
Bella3sp's avatar
Bella3sp
1
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
Though I wasn't mentioned, I assume this was directed towards me?

Still doesn't matter.. It exists, and controversally, it shouldn't even with your reasoning.
One can work the same job, same hours, complete the same "standards" and still a wage gap.

In fact, someone (female) could be the boss of their employee and the employee can still get paid more. Now if he was the boss, it would've been different.

It doesn't matter the reasoning behind it, it's still an (baised) inequality. That's what feminism is for: calling out the inequalities and fighting against it.
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
Genders are inherently unequal. Otherwise there would be one gender.
What an idiot. 

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,978
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Bella3sp
One can work the same job, same hours, complete the same "standards" and still a wage gap.

The problem is that "standards" are anything but.

Women's Basketball says the standard is dribbling a ball for 40 minutes. They should get paid for the same amount of dribbles as the men do.

Only a feminist would agree to this statement. Work output isn't measured in bean counting. Quality matters.

In fact, someone (female) could be the boss of their employee and the employee can still get paid more. Now if he was the boss, it would've been different.

The actual fact of the matter is that no man would be hirable if they demanded more pay for the same work, and would quickly be replaced by a woman who would work and provide the same exact work output for less pay. Regardless whether the boss is a man or a woman, the bottom line matters more than what is between your legs. 
Bella3sp
Bella3sp's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 214
1
4
9
Bella3sp's avatar
Bella3sp
1
4
9
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
I get his point. But in back of my mind, i'm really questioning the same thing.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,978
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Bella3sp
questioning the same thing.
Questioning what? That there's a reason for 2 unequal genders?
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,071
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Rieka
Adult humour.

My apologies.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,071
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Genders are inherently unequal. Otherwise there would be one gender.
Takes a bit of  thinking about.

But one must conclude, that contextually it is a precise and correct statement.



What an idiot.
One must conclude that this unnecessary 



Brings to mind the old adage.

Whereby, one must always put one's brain into gear before engaging one's mouth.

Or brains and keypads in this instance.

Fingers indeed.

Rieka
Rieka's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 131
0
2
6
Rieka's avatar
Rieka
0
2
6
-->
@sadolite
You're right. I probably am considering the fact that people think your truth and my truth is objective reality now.
Rieka
Rieka's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 131
0
2
6
Rieka's avatar
Rieka
0
2
6
-->
@DavidAZ
I honestly agree with all that you said. Women now are becoming more masculine, and are turning into the very gender they hate - men. It's hysterical how they rant about a "patriarchy" and that they're oppressed, yet no one is oppressing them. Besides, I've never seen a feminist that actually looked happy. It seems like men are doing much better off right now.
Rieka
Rieka's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 131
0
2
6
Rieka's avatar
Rieka
0
2
6
-->
@Bella3sp
I know they say they want equality for both genders, but feminism really only promotes females within itself - defeating that moral. Everybody is a girlboss now, whether they care or not! They slay for doing basic everyday things and being abnormal!
Rieka
Rieka's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 131
0
2
6
Rieka's avatar
Rieka
0
2
6
-->
@zedvictor4
? Not sure what you mean.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,640
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Bella3sp
To be honest, I dont understand what feminism is about.

I mostly see feminists screaming oppression every time someone says abortion is wrong.

So if oppression is anything that a feminist disagrees with, then the only way to not oppress feminists is to not disagree with them.

The moment you start demanding equality between men and women, is the moment you start feeling oppressed since such equality cannot exist.

Women give birth to children. Men do not. So the only way to make two equal is for women to stop giving births, therefore to destroy offspring.

Even in the workplace and even in schools, most women end up being less effective than most men.

The richest people are men.

Best chess players are men.

While there are women who have very high intelligence, slightly higher than that of smartest men, it still doesnt change that such women are very small minority among women.

Even if smartest person is a woman, it still stands that average woman is simply less intelligent than average man. So average woman will never be equal to average man in workplace or education.