Trump the dummy has been indicted. The indictment has been unsealed

weaponization

The country is broken. Democracy is broken.

There's going to be a witness at Trump's trial saying that Trump took pictures of the top-secret records and sold them to Russia.

He didn't present one single argument in his entire rant. The closest he came was by calling it a "documents case" completely lying about the fact that the bulk of these charges are for obstructing the investigation and overtly lying to federal investigators. This was pretty much 9 minutes of whataboutism.

This, btw is why I don't watch videos by people who are too intellectually lazy to write their own arguments. Is there one snippet of this rant that you think was insightful here? Don't know. I could sit here tearing it apart piece by piece and all you do is go "well that's not the part I was highlighting".

So feel free to enlighten us with your own words; what about this silly rant do you think destroys anyone's argument?

• Democrats want to take control of the United States
  
• Democrats want one party rule
  
• Democrats have weaponized the DOJ and FBI against their political opposition
  
• Presidential Records Act =/= a criminal statute
  
• Espionage Act: Woodrow Wilson weaponized it against his opponents and jailed over 2,000 of them
  
• DOJ and Jack Reed (via Eric Garland) are weaponizing the Espionage Act against Trump to trap him in a corner
  
• The allegations of obstruction are all false, there has been no obstruction at any time by Trump
  
• This is a documents case (civil law)
  
• Biden asserts he never told the DOJ and/or FBI what to do - LIE!
  
• Biden had to sign off on the weaponization of the DOJ & FBI against Trump, moving the matter from the National Archives over to the DOJ
  
• Double standards / 2 tiers of justice: Biden has in fact had documents from the days he was a fledgling Senator to VP strewn across the Eastern seaboard since the 1970s, all in insecure locations with no oversight; Hilary actually obstructed the government and should have been charged with 10,000 obstruction charges for each email bleachbit'd and 5 for destroying the 5 phones (government property)
  
• Did Trump sell any documents to the enemy? NO! Did he burn the documents to hide them? NO!! The government has all the documents back in their possession, so there is no violation of the Presidential Records Act.  
  
• DOJ has forced under duress, Trump's attorneys to violate their attorney client privilege during interrogations - Trump has been denied due process
  
• DOJ indicts Trump in Miami but not DC, why? Venue issues Reed and Garland know they would lose the case thereon. 
  
• Reed has an 8-0 loss ratio with SCOTUS precisely because he takes statutes and expands them into areas they do not cover. Reed is doing the same here against Trump - directly interfering with a Presidential Election
  
• Under the special counsel statutes, Biden should be investigated not Trump - a political rival - as a documents case doesn't warrant it nor falls under said statute.
  
• Biden should be under investigation for the clear-cut case of corruption with the pay to play bribery scheme that is actionable, but the DOJ criminalizes a documents case to hinder Trump's ability to campaign
  

This is a war on Trump, the Republican party and the Republic itself.

The fact that Trump has been constantly bombarded with impeachments, trials, investigations, etc, really shows a bias to the outside contender.

If it weren't for double standards, the left wouldn't have any standard at all.

Really, we need to get rid of the whole clown show that is congress and start over, 

They made an example of the Jan 6'ers by crushing them with the hardest crime they could.  They are making an example of Trump too.  The message is "Don't fight against the machine."

America is in a steady decline and it's sad to watch it.

Or it means Trump has broken a lot of rules and laws, including the constitution 

Did you hear that one on one of your right wing wack job talk radio shows?

Every one of those clowns was voted in by the people. The people get the government they deserve.

Lauren Boebert is a divorced high school dropout who got pregnant in high school. She’s a dummy and she has been elected twice in rural Colorado

The message is if you break the law as a subversive, you will go to jail

It is because of morons like you and the Republican Party

• Your conspiracy theory is not a fact or an argument
  

• No evidence the Dems want one party rule
  

• No evidence the Dems weaponized the government. Let me guess, Durham report?
  

• It doesn't need to be a criminal statue. One of his many violations is withholding documents that don't belong to him. That's theft. The Presidential Records Act dictates who owns the documents in question. 
  

• What Woodrow Wilson did or did not do is irrelevant
  

• Your conspiracy theories are not an argument
  

• Your opinion of what happened is not an argument
  

• Complete BS, in addition to the willful retention of classified documents he is also being charged with obstruction and lying to federal investigators
  

• Biden's statements to the FBI are irrelevant to the charges against Trump
  

• Whataboutism is not an argument against the indictment
  

• The indictment does not charge Trump with selling these documents and Trump did not give them back, they were seized during the search warrant
  

• The DOJ did not interrogate Trump's attorneys, they testified. You should know the difference. Attorney/Client privilege does not apply when it is used to commit a crime
  

• Why are you even asking this question? 95% of the residents of DC voted against Trump, so if they were just out to get him they would have tried him there. My guess is they are trying him in Florida because that's where he committed his crimes, which would make sense.
  

• Reed's record with SCOTUS is not an argument against the indictment
  

• Your opinion is not an argument against the indictment
  

• Whataboutism is not an argument against the indictment
  

This is a war on Trump, the Republican party and the Republic itself.

No, this is what holding a criminal to account looks like. It's unbelievably sad and pathetic that even something so simple as this indictment, complete with Trump insiders as witnesses, pictures, and recordings of Trump literally committing his crimes, the cult still remains unwaivered. (sic)

Indicting a former president and presidential candidate is definitely a problem,

...but the issue here is not the DOJ, the problem here is that we elected a man who so brazenly thinks he is above the law and would burn the country down before ever admitting to anything he did. Even Nixon had enough respect for democracy and the rule of law to resign. This is on you and every moron who put our nation's secrets in this man's hands.

@DavidAZ

The fact that Trump has been constantly bombarded with impeachments, trials, investigations, etc, really shows a bias to the outside contender.

Or it means Trump has broken a lot of rules and laws, including the constitution 

The fact that Trump has been constantly bombarded with impeachments, trials, investigations, etc, really shows a bias to the outside contender.

Let's indite Hillary for her emails, Joe Biden for his business deals

I did hear it from there and that made so much sense that I decided to adopt it.

Name ONE measure of the Constitution that Trump violated, and with evidence. 

And yet a federal judge disagrees with you as she did a conservative's legal group trying to get recordings from Clinton.

"The Court has seriously [sic] doubts about whether the former President’s retention of the audiotapes as personal is a matter that is subject to judicial review. But the Court need not decide this question because whether judicial review is available or not, the relief that plaintiff seeks – that the Archivist assume 'custody and control' of the audiotapes – is not available under the PRA," Jackson wrote in her decision (posted here)."

He was the POTUS and had broad authority where those records were concerned.

There was no "willful" retention, he complied with all parameters of security advised to do so.

Never said he gave them back, I said they were back in the government's possession, ergo no violation of the PRA. 

This is like claiming that your school is terrible and the evidence of that is that your report card shows all F's.

Trump has been impeached and investigated over and over again because he's easily the most brazenly corrupt individual we've ever seen in US politics. This should have been obvious from the very beginning by his very public infatuation with his mentor Roy Cohn. If not his fake university, fake charity, and droves of unpaid contractors should have given people the hint. Yet here we are, despite all of the evidence against him,  right wing cultists still blame everyone else for the crime of investigating him.

This is the level of absurdity one must lower themselves to in order to defend Donald Trump.

If HR 1 is enacted, they won’t need any such excuse in 2022 because the states will have no choice but to implement policies such as legalized ballot harvesting, early voting, and universal mail-in voting, as well as repeal of voter ID laws, signature-matching laws, and other ballot security measures. 

Under the rules outlined in HR 1, election observers wouldn’t even be able to challenge the legitimacy of ballots without written documentation, making it virtually impossible to document or detect election irregularities.