so you think if this guy didn't have a gun, that he would have 1. first of attempted to kill all those people 2. he would have been successful killing all those people?
people who think the presence of guns makes no difference in murder rate, lack critical thinking skills.
First of all, you don't know the exact context of what happened.
Also, people who are good citizens can still do bad things.
It's probably his fault. This man is definitely probably at fault. He made a bad choice with his gun, that he legally owned, and is being charged for that.
That is how the law works.
I would also like to point out that the person who wasn't killed in this scenario was invited to the White House. Mainly because he was black. Now don't get me wrong, this person went through something awful, but the White House?
Did the White House invite the families of the kids who died in Uvalde or Tennessee? Why not them, and this person instead?
The main reason why guns are not the problem, is because of the fact that there are more guns in the U.S than people. There are approximately, 334,692,929 living in the United States. The number of guns is approximately 434,000,000. The fact that our country is one of, if not the most powerful, and stable country in the world, with that many guns being owned by the people, proves that guns aren't the problem for gun violence. It is the people who choose to break the law, or the violent people who are the problem. So, if anything, these rise in mass shootings, and normal shootings prove that there is a rise in bad people or violent people in the United States today.