Tucker Carlson quietly moves to Florida weeks, before he left Fox.
Is Tucker Carlson going to try to run for VP, with Trump?
Posts
Total:
65
Well dummy, considering Tucker hates Trump but was forced to grovel at his feet and Trump basically caused Tucker to be fired from a network for the third time, I would say there is zero chance of that happening.
He's a media man. I doubt it.
I love how they always get us excited about the future VP they will pick. Biden didn't do that.
Biden was like "fuck meritocracy, I am definitely picking a woman."
Most people prior to picking a VP say "I am picking somebody that will challenge me who is different than me politically, etc "
I get amped up because I am like thinking "fuck yeah they are going to cross the party line and Hillary will be running with Ted Cruz" then they are just like "here is that candidate I was talking about, and we see Clinton coming out with Al gore.
They think picking a candidate similar to them decreases their chance of being assassinated. It didn't stop Bush from trying to murder Reagan though.
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
Also, let me pick a woman with less than 1% primary support, that way I will look like a cool guy in comparison.
Most people prior to picking a VP say "I am picking somebody that will challenge me who is different than me politically, etc "
That’s nonsense. Please, you work at a restaurant. Go marry the ketchup bottles.
none of these VPs challenged the President
Regan picked HW Bush
Bush picked Dan Quayle for someone who would shut up and not bother him.
Clinton picked Al Gore
George Bush had Cheney as adult supervision
Obama picked Biden to help with Senate
Trump picked Pence to appease religious conservatives
It didn't stop Bush from trying to murder Reagan though.
Another Q conspiracy
Also, let me pick a woman with less than 1% primary support, that way I will look like a cool guy in comparison.
Still not working?
none of these VPs challenged the President
That's what I said. We said the exact same thing. VP's are very similar in ideology to the presidential nomination. Read more carefully before responding. Maybe take a break from chewing crayons to digest what was said
They think picking a candidate similar to them decreases their chance of being assassinated.
This is your brain at work: US Presidents are concerned about assassination, Derp
Go check the fryer grease. Does it need to be changed yet?
This retard really thinks that no president has ever been assassinated.
Unstoppable force meets immovable object. I think you two should be friends.
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Tucker Carlson quietly moves to Florida weeks, before he left Fox.
Ummmm, yeah, I mean, why else would a person buy a house in Florida, that's gotta be it.
Sure, Putin would make him a running mate before Trump would, but then again, he did buy a house.
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Tucker found out he was being fired 10 minutes before the public statement was made. He got fired with almost 0 warning. So no, him buying property weeks earlier is not related to his firing.
This retard really thinks that no president has ever been assassinated.
No, that’s dumb. But you are a dummy so no surprise. Reducing the chance of being assassinated is not even in the top 50 considerations when picking a VP.
-->
@HistoryBuff
Why do you think he didn't see the painting on the wall months earlier?
-->
@Sidewalker
They can literally offer anybody a job. I have an open offer for Biden to plant Tulips for $20 an hour.
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
They can literally offer anybody a job.
Yeah, but they don't "literally offer anybody a job", they offer Tucker Carlson a job.
I have an open offer for Biden to plant Tulips for $20 an hour.
No way, I pay him $30 and hour to do yardwork.
-->
@Sidewalker
Sure they do. Ukraine is offering a job to anyone willing to help them take the Donbas.
America offers anyone a job to hop the fence and come pick fruit in California.
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
"Reducing the chance of being assassinated is not even in the top 50 considerations when picking a VP." Source?
-->
@Sidewalker
Yeah, but they don't "literally offer anybody a job", they offer Tucker Carlson a job.
I didn't offer anybody a job. I personally offered Biden a job. That some how reflects on Biden's character in what way?
-->
@Sidewalker
I doubt Tucker is directly paid by russians. He repeats their talking points because it benefits him to be "anti-war", even if his message is just pro-russian imperialism. And if he did get directly paid for it, then he wouldn't be any good at it any more because he would then be obviously just russian propaganda.
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
Why do you think he didn't see the painting on the wall months earlier?
Why do you think buying a house has anything whatsoever to do with running for VP?
-->
@HistoryBuff
Is it possible to be anti war and anti-Russian at the same time?
It seems to me that the military industrial complex has a financial interest to convince you that this statement can only be false in every case.
-->
@Sidewalker
History buff's quote
Tucker found out he was being fired 10 minutes before the public statement was made. He got fired with almost 0 warning. So no, him buying property weeks earlier is not related to his firing.
-->
@Greyparrot
Is it possible to be anti war and anti-Russian at the same time?
of course it is. But in this context, how? Russia is the aggressor. They have invaded a neighbor and have made it clear their goal is to annex huge swathes of Ukrainian land. I am guessing "anti-war" to you means trying to get some sort of negotiated peace now. If I am wrong in that assessment, please correct me. That position is inherently pro-Russian because Russia is still in control of large swathes of Ukrainian territory and Russia has made it clear a peace deal would include them stealing land. So you can't be both pro-negotiated settlement (right now) and anti-Russian. The only way to be anti-Russian and anti-war, is to support giving Ukraine all the support required to retake their land. That way russia doesn't get to profit off the war (by stealing ukrainian land) and the war ends as fast as possible.
It seems to me that the military industrial complex has a financial interest to convince you that this statement can only be false in every case.
Please explain what an anti-war, anti-russian stance is.
-->
@HistoryBuff
They have invaded a neighbor
Yes. Russia needs to pay for its illegal invasion of Iraq, I mean Ukraine.
Unlike NATO.
NATO invaded Libya and killed lots of people there.
But its okay because no one cares when NATO does the war.
Why should we try to be logically consistent?
We dont need logic when we have love.
And the military industry that feeds on war.
-->
@HistoryBuff
An anti-Russian, anti war stance would be that it is not in the USA's interest to finance Ukraine's conquest of the Donbas region as a result of their 2014 Civil war.
Russia is still in control of large swathes of Ukrainian territory...
Is it your contention that the Donbas is definitively Ukrainian territory?
What facts do you have to support this claim knowing that the vast majority of the civilians in the Donbas today are not only Russian speakers and ethnically Russian, but also Russian nationals as well?
And even if you somehow were in support of the 2014 ethnic cleansing of the Donbas, what do you think would be the ethical thing to do with those people as they are being forcefully displaced? Does it even matter if they are ethnically Russian to you, or does your hatred for Putin extend to all ethnic Russians no matter where they may live so that extermination would be a viable ethical option?