Time Is Only Dimension

Author: ebuc

Posts

Total: 192
#121
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,067
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@John_C_87
As I see it, math is created by a thinker, and in that context math is just another representation or calibration of potential.

Time and Space are potential, and Matter creates observable potential.

Time and space are just descriptions of the potential we observe relative to matter.


So let me put questions to you in another way.

If our universe is limited by a finite space then what do you imagine beyond?

I think that Ebuc would say Infinite space....But unoccupied.

But why would Infinite space beyond our finite space necessarily be unoccupied.
Topic's author
#122
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,920
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@zedvictor4
As I see it, math is created by a thinker, and in that context math is just another representation or calibration of potential.
Discovered by thinker ---Spirit-1, Meta-space mind/intellect/concepts and ego---.

Time and Space are potential, and Matter creates observable potential.
Spirit-2 = Observable { quantised } time is fermionic matter and bosonic forces.

Physical reality aka energy is ability { potential? } to do work. Brain { reality } processing requires energy { reality }.

Time and space are just descriptions of the potential we observe relative to matter.
See above Spirit-2 = Observed { qunatised } time

Geodesic occupied primary space = Gravity (  ) and Dark Energy )(. Simple

If our universe is limited by a finite space then what do you imagine beyond?
Eternally existent, occupied space Universe is not limited by a finite space.  Occupied space Universe is finite, yet may expand-contract, within  context of the eternally existent,  macro-infinite non-occupied space. Simple. Why make these words into a convoluted mess that is less sensible, makes no sense.

But why would Infinite space beyond our finite space necessarily be unoccupied.
Infinite = lack of integrity.

Finite = systemic and structural integrity...." the state of being whole and undivided".....occupied space Universe is whole by virtue of Spirit-3, outer Gravity (  ) and Spirit-4, inner Dark Energy )( and to whatever degree, the invaginated resultant of those two, is sine-wave^v^v^ associated physical reality aka Spirit-2.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So we recall that14 nodal events –-as the graviton-DarkEon quantum particle--- has 91lines-of-relationship, we also see that at 18 we have 153lines-of-relationship via 18^2, minus 18 / 2 = 153.

And here we mustrecall, that, at 14 we believe the graviton-darkEon cannot beisolated out from space and time, as a quantum particle, rather, the graviton-darkEon must remainas a Pulsation only, within a greater torus, that ends at 18,because, it is at 18 we have  the first nodal event after 14, that, comes backaround to meet with 0 on the same line { top peak of sine-wave } and form a quantum Space-timetorus, since 18/0 share the same location once we see that, the each of the four lines in 3D, are cuvred around to meet its other end i.e. 0....6...12......18 meet as 18/0.

Again the 91 lines-of-relationship of the graviton-darkEon quantum pulsation, is within context of 14 nodal events on the 2D lattice, that, define a truncated at two di-polar ends, triangular, di-pyramid LINK  i.e. this defines three triangles | | | i.e. three nodal events at one end, three in middle and three at the other end.

And in the 2D lattice we can see it has five nuclear nodal events that define a sine-wave /\/\

I say graviton-darkEon is a pulsation because of   my original idea, via a Euclidean concept of the truncated,di-pyramid, is that, as the triangle _ three nodal events } at one end closes, the triangle{ 3 nodal events } in middle expands, and when the middle triangle { three nodal events } closes, the triangle  [3 nodal events } at next end opens.

Think of it as artery and blood pulsation { heart beat } we can feel the pressure of in our wrists, or other places on our body.








#123
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,597
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@ebuc

Well stated.
#124
John_C_87
John_C_87's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 287
0
2
5
John_C_87's avatar
John_C_87
0
2
5
-->
@zedvictor4
Time and space are just descriptions of the potential we observe relative to matter.
Here is the kick time is proportional to enery. It is a mathmatic description of a physics event. That event is energy.

If our universe is limited by a finite space then what do you imagine beyond?
The issue here is a sphere has infinite travle around a circumference.  What would gather at the end of ""space"" is by navigation energy in a state of change.
As I see it, math is created by a thinker, and in that context math is just another representation or calibration of potential.
Math as used for astronomy is a means to an end of navigatioin.  Math is a science which has its own flaws which are to be corrected to reach potential.

ebuc and I go back.He does not agree with my fourth law of motion that describes gravity. calculusonce corrected of error explains the way objects mover to describe gravity as a clear common universal motion in proportion to energy.
Topic's author
#125
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,920
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@FLRW
Well stated.

Thank you FLRW, tho keep in mind that, I'm not an English  major, and self taught typer in late 40's.

Tho ive been developing/evolving  these concepts over 30 years, most times I type them out on spur of moment, and dont have the words phrases etc in best presentation to clarify the specifics of my concepts. Plus I do this and run out of time for various reasons. Oh well. I try.

Once I'm very clear, others should not have too much difficulty unless unfamiliar with geometric and physics terms used.  Rarely has any one every provided any logical, common sense critical thinking that adds to my concepts or invalidates them.

The Quantum Space-time Torus is ---in my 2D presentation/format--- is rather simple. Unfortunaltly Ive never had skills to to do a nice 3D version and no one has come along to offer my assistance in doing so, ergo, I have onlly texticonic presentation to offer for most part, with occasional link to some graphics that only approximate some of my concepts.
#126
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,067
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@John_C_87

Theory is imagination and imagination is theory.

And imagination is an unlimited potential, which is analogical to the question.

Though it would seem that John_C_87's and Ebucs potential is analogical to their theory.
#127
John_C_87
John_C_87's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 287
0
2
5
John_C_87's avatar
John_C_87
0
2
5
-->
@zedvictor4
a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena.

: the act or power of forming a mental image of something not present to the senses or never before wholly perceived in reality

: a proposition (as in mathematics) before it has been proved or disproved


: of, relating to, or being a mechanism or device in which information is represented by continuously variable physical quantities

. Time does not lookthe same in all three dimensions of space when observed from a dimension ofspace. Time appears as a circle, a vertical line, and a horizontal line. I willgo into detail as detail is requested. Time is a Geometric equation of three objectsdrawn as one objest.  The three objects which are chosen are universal and are locatedeverywhere in the observed universe.
. Einstien's space-time is believed to be relative. It is howver proven as fact a error in algabra which has created it as it the error has been made part of Einstien's field equaitoin.

 Zedvictor4 ebuc is talking aboutphysics, whereas I am talking about errors shared in Algebra, Geometry, Trigonometry,and Calculus which affect physics.

#128
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,067
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@John_C_87
I would suggest that Time doesn't actually look like anything.

And neither does Space.

We only know what agglomerated matter looks like and we attribute dimension to it and it's function.

Less or more than that and we theorise, physically, mathematically and imaginatively.


Time does not look the same in all three dimensions of space when observed from a dimension of space.
Is imaginative thinking.


Though I suppose TIME, to a greater extent all depends upon the purity of word and how we might corrupt it. 
Topic's author
#129
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,920
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@zedvictor4
Though I suppose TIME, to a greater extent all depends upon the purity of word and how we might corrupt it.
Purity = more and more refined definitions of the concept were trying present, as we approach absolute and never arriving at absolute truth, just orbiting closer in our occupied space time of accessing Meta-space time via our occupied space observed time.

1} Meta-space time is abstract units of measure applied to this or that or other kinds of duration.

2} observed { quantised } time is physical reality of fermiionic matter and bosoic forces, that, both are associated with a sine-wave pattern presented as ^v^v^ or as /\/\/ with the keyboard characters.

If Fuller is correct that, time is the only dimension, I understand what he means.   He goes on to say in synergetics time is frequency, and that frequency relates to shell growth of the 4-fold Vector Equlibrium { VE } or sub-division of his VE i.e. multiplication-by-division of any polyhedron ex the 5-fold icosahedrons 20 circles can conceptually be subdivided and create 120 right-triangles. --see viruses icosahedral design--

........>........entropic-arrow-of-time-------->-------heat death of Universe

.......past....>....>..in..>( * ) i   ( * )>..out ..>......future...... heat death of finite Universe

.........past.....<.....<..out..<( * ) i   ( * )< ..in........future........syntropric growth of finite Universe

----<------- syntropic-arrow-of-time-----<------future......syntropic output of Universe's

>>>>>>mass-attraction<<<<<<<<<<<<<<mass-repulsion>>>>>>>>Gravity-Dark-Energy is savior of occupied space integrity

.......space................( time )( time )......................space composed of many  interacting and overlapping Quantum Space-time Tori { StT }


.......space............gravity>(time)(time)<gravity.............space.........gravity always on outer perriphery of finite Universe

.........space............(time)<Dark Energy>(time).........space............dark energy always inner surface of each Quantum Space-time Tori
#130
John_C_87
John_C_87's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 287
0
2
5
John_C_87's avatar
John_C_87
0
2
5
-->
@zedvictor4
Time is imaginative thinking. 
I can agree with this to some exstent. Time however doesn't look like any one thing as it is a combination of three elements that are found throughout the universe.

Though I suppose TIME, to a greater extent all depends upon the purity of word and how we might corrupt it. 

lol.........Do you know it is time which was found and used to created lines of longitude they are in contradiction to the lines of latitude which are created by a magnetic field and a magnetic compass. This is not imagination it is geometry and trigonometry.

Okay this may bring back memories of who I was for ebuc. When last we had been descussing our principles ,I had described to him that Atomic Clocks have a decimal infration in its aplicatioin of time. This is not a imaginary problem and there is now a second issue I have uncoverd while to correcting the first issue for work I am doing in realtionship to synconize time in such way as to forcast Earthquakes and deep space navigation. Time is a gometric device of navigation.

Simply said space looks like a flat plane with ripples when mathmaticaly translated because of the numbers of decimal infrations and their pattern of repetition in the mathmatics use to measure space and not time. 

Whereas time when left mathematically uncorrupted had its own specific figurpints of decimal mathematic infraction. See time is already a decimal which is then held in precise mathmatic proportion and could not be added to Einstiens or Newtons work mathmatically without significant changes made to Algabra, Geometry, and trigonometry.

In conclusion, as my work can help ebuc's own work in some ways or not. The second mathmatical grievance of great concern I have located is the lack of clear understanding of natural numbers in algabra. In calculus we describe space with letters like x, y, and z which describe variables in math. It is letters high in the alphebet like a,b,c,d etc that descibe are constants. However in case you do not understand the basic it is natual mumbers which describe if a zero or negativbe numbers can be equated in algabra. 
#131
John_C_87
John_C_87's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 287
0
2
5
John_C_87's avatar
John_C_87
0
2
5
lol.........Do you know it is time which was found and used to created lines of longitude they are in contradiction to the lines of latitude which are created by a magnetic field and a magnetic compass. This is not imagination it is geometry and trigonometry.

I hope I didn't get this backward I do often if so, sorry.
#132
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,067
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@John_C_87
Hmmmm.

So as far as we are able to know, everything that occurs in a Universe is real.

And along came an  intelligent species with a strong sense of memory and a constructive imagination.

And devised methodology that allowed them to understand and develop.


Now, notwithstanding a GOD principle.

And if we were to hypothetically remove the intelligent species from the equation.

Would Time and Space have any less potential?
Topic's author
#133
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,920
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@zedvictor4
So as far as we are able to know, everything that occurs in a Universe is real.
Lacks definitive clarity Zed.

Ultra-micro Gravity and Dark Energy are not in "real " catagory because, they have not been quantised nor quantified. Ive made this clear for some years now.

Physical reality = energy = observed { quantised } time via fermionic matter and bosonic forces, that, you have yet to ever mention the latter. You seem ignorant clue-less to the latter even tho I remind you constantly. These Spirit-2 reality are associated with sine-wave ^v^v patterning, that you also seem ignorant of even tho I make it clear to you many times.

Now, notwithstanding a GOD principle.
Zed once again, you offer little to no definitive clarity one what you "GOD principle" is specifically.

The Cosmic Trinary Set --think table of contents for book labled Cosmic Trinary Set-----   Ive clearly laid out is the most wholistic set:

1} Spirit-1 Meta-space

-----conceptual line-of-demarcation

2} eternally existent, macro-infinite truly non-occupied space, that, embrace this following

3} Spirit-2 { reality }, 3 { Gravity } and 4 { Dark Energy }, eternally existent, finite, occupied space Universe { @ }. None --includes you--- have ever offerred any logical common sense critical thinking that, adds to the set or invalidates it. Those who try have of course failed.

And if we were to hypothetically remove the intelligent species from the equation.
That is like each of considering the time before each existed as a human. We have no memory of such time.

Would Time and Space have any less potential?

Again, until you grasp there exists two primary kinds of time { observed and Meta-space abstraction } you lack the basic initiating starting place regarding the word time.
Also Zed you dont seem to be able to grasp the concepts of eternity.

"Eternity is to time, as,
Infinite is to space."...Bucky Fuller

1, 2 and 3 of the Cosmic Trinary Set are eternally existent.

Past.......relative......to NOW.....relative to future via causality

Does Universe have memory of its last cyclic phase/state, before its Big Bang/WOW!?  Roger Penrose thinks it does and can be partially found in the cosmic background radiation.  If I recall correctly this involves black hole phenomena that come close to transcending what is known and can be remembered by Universe.

However, there is also quantum entanglement { superpostion } i.e. that which is both a 1 and a 0. ON and off, active and non-active, left-and right, dead and alive etc spooky-action-at-a-distance or with some cosmic particle.

I say this state/phase is geometrically not opposites ---as I believe Gravity (   ) and Dark Energy )( are--- ratther they are states of precession i.e. at 90 degrees to each other +

The3-fold  tetra{4}hedron has three such precessed  --at 90 degees to each other---  edges/chords/struts/vectors and viewed as  parrallel bisection LINK

The other thing to recall about the 3-fold minimal structure of Universe tetrahedron, is that its four surface planes are in the same 60 degree orientation as the f4-fold Vector Equilibrium { VE } See LINK to better understand this relationship and what I believe is one way to understand black hole phenomena.


And then recall that the VE jitterbugs into at least 7 exotic shapes  ex two kinds of negative and positive curvature, sine-wave patterning,  albeit withing context of a Euclidean format.  Without access to computer graphics I dont know what resultants can occur in formats that are not Euclidean.

One of the most interesting to me is its phase/state of seemingly quasi-2D, that is both a square sine-wave having positive and negative curvature form,  and from there,

it fin-folds into a seemingly 2D, hexagonal { 6 triangles }  phase/state, with a 7th set of two triangles that act appear as a tail wing to the hexagon, as if occupied space says, I refuse to go into a purely 2D only state.

When this tail wing spreads its two triangles apart, the whole hexagon out folds back to the positive negative curvature state/phase of square sine-wave patterning.
#134
John_C_87
John_C_87's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 287
0
2
5
John_C_87's avatar
John_C_87
0
2
5
-->
@zedvictor4
Would Time and Space have any less potential?
Yes time and space would have far less potential. Space as the universe would simple only hold the means to earths end and not a beginng for all people. Time is a measurment on three object simaltaneously in a more precise proportion then space, with or without people time can not exist unless the comparison of the objects is made. As theory physics is trying to establish artifical horizon and tap the location of gravity.

A little more background zedvictor4 I have written a law of motion for Gravity to describe a observation of geometric shape and how a sphere might form in a vacuum with far less matter to create wear on matter which forms of much greater desity then the vacuum which surrounds it.  Fourth law added on Newton's Laws of Motion states. "Gravity the combined energy of elasticity, modulation, and reverberation in which objects of mass can both repel and attract, based on how those three forces interact." To share observation made on work habit it is possible Isaac Newton had written the three laws of motion based on the movement within numbers during mathmatics itself and only held this observation of numbers as movements in equations against observation made in astronomy.

The issue of physics is that space-time is a shadow only made in mathematics as a ghost in the machine, this shadow is cast into reality by tools used to make observations on things we can naturally see by human eyes but rather observe from great distance recorded on machinery with a question looming on their conditions of being properly calibrated devices. This is not about A.I.  Again, this is a issue of people using mixtures of natural numbers in combination with real numbers in algebra without regard as to which is which number. a + b  =  a + b which (a) is natural number? which (a) is the real number? we cannot cancel like terms. The rule only states that both (a)'s are to be considered constant. We can also look at the total removal 3.14159 as precise ratio by calculus describing boundaries of circumference by Chord. The diameter of a circle is simple one of many chords held in circumference.

#135
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,067
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@ebuc
@John_C_87
So as  far as we are able to know, everything that occurs in a Universe is real.

Couldn't be more definitively clear, even if it came and smacked you in the face with a wet fish.


GOD principle.

Such a simple concept, yet two imaginative theorists can't grapple with it.



Would time and space have any less potential?

Of course not.

Because the potential of Time and Space preceded thinking species by aeons.

How did we occur without the potential to do so.



Let's be honest.

Is there anything more definitively unclear than theory.

The clue is in the word theory.

Extravagant ideas, never proven.

Which might or might not be wholly or partially correct.

Or not correct at all.
#136
John_C_87
John_C_87's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 287
0
2
5
John_C_87's avatar
John_C_87
0
2
5
-->
@zedvictor4
The issue is Time and space are laws of Mathematics not theory, some treate time and space as theory. There is  difference when the law of Time can be broken it is not ruled over like laws if justice, justifed the question is does the process of change made on time itself in fact hold the law of time equal after the violation of mathmatic law occures? You call both time and space theory because well physics calls them theory. The issue of truth here is that physics call everything theory regardless of that statement be true or not. It is physics which is mathematicaly alturing time and space to be the same object not caring that time is three different things and space is a observation of area.

The issue of the GOD principle is the principle is expected GOD to be held a religion. There is a expectation that is not law.

Theories are provenall the time...G.R.  E = Mc^2is theory but as fact written as theory as G = Mc^2 due to the fielded equationof G.R. the theory of G.R is made law by addressing the errors in mathematicsset by physics and rewrite G.R. as G ≈ Mc^2. Why is G.R now law? It is lawbecause gravity was and is on both sides of the linear equation here are found by use ofirrational number. This means the equation will never have a precise integer asanswer.
Topic's author
#137
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,920
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@zedvictor4
So as  far as we are able to know, everything that occurs in a Universe is real.
Zed you still not able to grasps catagories nor distinctions between phenomena that is quantised aka physical reality, and ultta-micro Gravity and Dark Energy.

It is like some kind of religious nutter who refuses logical common sense critical thinking and the facts of physics. I think your mentor Gump keeping you in Gumpy mentality.

Couldn't be more definitively clear, even if it came and smacked you in the face with a wet fish.
Zed, your constantly in denial of truths and facts presented to you. Why is that? To much Gumpy on the brain.

GOD principle. Such a simple concept, yet two imaginative theorists can't grapple with it.

And here we go with the religous gumpy non-logic once again. Not to mention that, once again, no shred of definitively descriptive clarification of your "God principle " and Ive been asking you for such for at least a year now.

Would time and space have any less potential?

Your cluless and rambling as to what time and space are. Ive provided you with much truth and definitive descriptive clarity on the issue, that, like most religious fundamentalist, you ignore for " God principle " and some alledged potential, that again, has no definitive descriptive clarity to go with it. 

Because the potential of Time and Space preceded thinking species by aeons.
More ramblings from religous Gumpy stuck on a non-descripitive " potential " and non-descripive "God principle".  Zilch is what you offerring us.

A little Gumpy now and then is cool. Your attempts to make it a religous practice is not cool

How did we occur without the potential to do so.
If you question is how to biologic life came to exist, there are many books over the years, and some experiments to attempt to create biological life in test tube. The best theve done is to create left-handed amino-acids, that biologic life uses. there is some other stuff out of those who claim to have created life.  Ive not seen anything convincing yet,

Cosmic Ancestry proposes ---and ive considered as a possiblity--- is that biologic life is eternally existent, as Gravitational and Dark Energy encodings inside a black hole and on its 2D surface. This is to say some black holes are coding for all the exist in Universe. Or perhaps some kinds of black holes encodes some aspects of Universe and other black holes encode other aspects of Universe

Let's be honest.
I be happy just to see more  logical, common sense critical thinking from you first and more acknowledgement you actually grasp any of the truths when presented to you.

Zed, the rest of your below is kinda of like ramblings of  confused Gumpy person reaching out and not finding any clearly defined branchs that you hands can grab on to the next branch of significant thoughts. Sorry dude, but stuck in a rut going nowhere.

Is there anything more definitively unclear than theory.

The clue is in the word theory.

Extravagant ideas, never proven.

Which might or might not be wholly or partially correct.

Or not correct at all.






#138
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,067
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@ebuc
@John_C_87
If something remains theoretical, then it does so.

If a theory is proven, then it is no longer a theory.

Intellectually moving forwards where applicable.

Nonetheless, if we understood everything then we would understand everything.

But we do not.

Neither me, nor John_C_87 nor Ebuc.

Nor anyone else for that matter.
#139
John_C_87
John_C_87's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 287
0
2
5
John_C_87's avatar
John_C_87
0
2
5
-->
@zedvictor4
If something remains theoretical, then it does so. If a theory is proven, then it is no longer a theory.
This is not consistently true a theory can remain a theory as long as it is written as a theory proof is not reivant. We astablish that with the theory of Gedneral Relativity E = Mc ^ 2 is the theory, but, G  ≈ Mc ^ 2  is no longer theory it is a law of mathematics. According to Eienstien and the field equation written by he these formulas are the same principle. One written as thoery, one written as mathematic law.

I do understand the principle behind the point made theory has a self-evident limitaction it is theory. So thoery however are written as so they can never be proven true we are only capalble of finding the math error which creates them. The error which perpetuates Genderal Relativity is Space-Time. Where is space time in mathematics? Right here it is (0.016.1 - 0.018.333etc.) <--------  this is space time. The gamble or bet was that no- one would find the mathematic error. We also call Space time a nano-second which is also written as 1.001 seconds or 0.016.1 seconds. <-----Just how smart does that real look like? We can write it as ( 12: 00: 01.1) it at least looks correct. 

Where does Einsien's space-time exist? It exists at Einstien's error not by his own creationbut by his own neligence or incompetence. The ratio of time 12: 00: 00 does not have decimal points. The comuter age created the nano-second and it is not a principle found in the geometry of time created in nature. The principle of time having an ability to be made around a artifical horizon is not the same as people adding a decimal point arbitralliy to a ratio. There are more then one error in math which influence the theory of Gedneral Relativity. The errors are not made in algebra alone the errors are also made in basic grade school math something everyone should understand.

Topic's author
#140
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,920
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@zedvictor4
If something remains theoretical, then it does so.
Forrest Gumpy speak of obvious  Old news

If a theory is proven, then it is no longer a theory.
More Gumpy speak of obvious

Intellectually moving forwards where applicable.
More Gumpy speak

Nonetheless, if we understood everything then we would understand everything.
Gumpy again

But we do not.
Gumpy obvious again.

Neither me, nor John_C_87 nor Ebuc.

No one here claiming to know everything Zed. Are you trying to create a false narrative about others?

Nor anyone else for that matter.
Gumpy speaks the obvious again.

What Gumpy does not do, is address any of the specific givens, as presented, with any logical, common sense critical thinking, that adds to those givens presented, or invalidates them. Why? Because, as we approach absolute truth, it becomes more difficult to refine our definitive descriptions to the most pure presentation of the absolute truth.

Observed { quantised } time is the only dimension of occupied space as physical reality aka energy ergo fermionic matter and bosonic forces. Simple not complex to grasp.  In synergetics time is frequency.  ..all that exists is moderation/modulation of angle and frequency....b Fuller, however,

that is speaking only to occupied space, not Meta-space mind/intellect/concepts i.e. concepts of frequency not an actual occupied space frequency.

Here is where the Cosmic Trinary Set is always the base reference for all that is considerable. We could say that the Cosmic Trinary Set is our Meta-space safety net.

:--) oops there is another one of those iconic 2ndary symbolisms that send some people into false narrative mode.  When was automobiles started using those iconic 2ndary symbolism for wipers, lights etc.  And differrent cars may have had a differrent icon, and then the new icons came along and we all were on a learning curve





#141
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,067
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@ebuc
Yep. The obvious is the obvious.

And so you agree that Ebuc-speak isn't obviously true.

Or necessarily true at all.

Good.


Topic's author
#142
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,920
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@zedvictor4
And so you agree that Ebuc-speak isn't obviously true.
1} You show some little actual comprhension of any of my concepts as presented, as show by you in ability to address any of the specifics as presented,

2} you show little ability to address any of the logical, common sense pathways I present to reach my conclusions,

3} you show little ability to provide definitive clarity for most of you givens ex " God principle ", ' infinite potential ", etc,

4} your very good at presenting the obvious with Forrest Gumpy type phrases.

You get a small e for you effort, { thank you } as Ive laid out previously to you. And here we are once again, with your not adding too or invalidating any of my givens, and certainly not doing so with any logic, common sense critical thinking in any of the threads Ive created ex "Cosmic Scenarios".

humans have been using 2ndary picto-grahic symbolisms for 1000's of years and still to this day and you and others create a false narrative in regards to my use of texticonic symblisms that, Ive used along with definitively descriptive clarity.  This is sad lack of moral and intellectual integrity on your,  and others, to save face/ego.

The ego cannot die, however, ego can be placed to the side long enough to allow sincerity of heart and mind of any concepts

..................space......Gravity>( time ) i  ( time )Gravity........space.....

i = Spirit-1 Meta-space ego/identity, concepts, intellect etc

(    ) =Spirit-3 geodesic outer surface set of nodal events as ultra-micro Gravity. ---old logic, common sense critical thinking---

)( = Spirit-4 geodesic inner surface set of nodal events as ultra-micro Dark Energy ---old logic, common sense critical thinking---

time = Spirit-2 inside tube of torus as physical reality aka observed { quantised } time aka energy

...space--- = macro-infinite, and truly non-occupied space

:--) = smiley face

......space.....( * ) i  ( * ).......space...

*  * = bilateral biologic consciousness as resultant with context of observed time reality, that, may have accesss to Meta-space mind/intellect/concepts, with most complex entity of Universe being human female with human male 2nd in complexit ---barring ideas of two or more women ergo a planet of women and men etc, and barring black hole phenomena and of course barring the idea of Universe { @ }.

@ = 2ndary symbolism for Universe in case you couldnt grasp in the line above, i repeat it in Gumpy-like obvious way for you as if worn on a Gumpy T-shirt as he runs on highway

/\/\/\/ or as ^v^v^ = Euclidean texticon representation of the more curved sine-wave pattern associated with some if not all Spirit-2  fermionic mattter and bosonic forces aka Spirit-2

.....space............(/\/\/)(/\/\/)............space..................

I believe finite Universe is composed of finite set of overlapping, interacting, transforming Quantum Space-time Tori, that, can be expressed in 2D as a lattice pattern of four parrallel lines/levels. with sequential set of numbers, in asymmetrical patterns of hexagons with numerical nuclei as observed time reality/energy.

We also fine all prime numbers, ---except 2p and 3p--- on the top ( outer Gravitational geodesic } line, along with other non-prime number. Any significance of this set of prime number set is not known at this time.

With the above 2D lattice of four lines, curved around to meet themselves, and then conceptualize geodesic trajectories between 1-2, 4-5p, 7p-8, 10-11p etc we define the outer and inner geodesics of the toroidal tube.

On the inside of the tube via invagination trajectoris from outer and inner surface set of nodal events, we find the sequence of numbers 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 etc, that I associate with physical reality { Spirit-2 } as they nuclear numbers define a sine-wave pattern /\/\/\/\/  or as ^v^v^

This is the cosmic trinary primary ubset of our eternally existent, finite, occupied space Universe { @ }.

..............space..................@...................space..........................simple, not complex to grasp, even for a Gumpy-like person. * ! *
#143
John_C_87
John_C_87's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 287
0
2
5
John_C_87's avatar
John_C_87
0
2
5
-->
@ebuc
This is the problem... A sine and cosine wave are to be taken on a cuved line created by the geometric shape of the soruce of energy, the atomic reaction or sun?
Do we all see the sun as sphere?

The sun's enery radiates out in a curve around the shape of the sun itself. Two straight lines are just not going to work in mathematics like promised by Physics theory. 

160 days later

#144
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,597
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@John_C_87

In 2016, scientists announced they had directly detected gravitational waves, literal ripples in the fabric of spacetime. It was a huge validation of Einstein’s work, which had predicted their existence almost exactly 100 years prior. The find also heralded a new era of astronomy, as researchers now have a new way to study the Universe.
#145
John_C_87
John_C_87's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 287
0
2
5
John_C_87's avatar
John_C_87
0
2
5
-->
@FLRW
In 2016, scientists announced they had directly detected gravitational waves, literal ripples in the fabric of spacetime. It was a huge validation of Einstein’s work, which had predicted their existence almost exactly 100 years prior. The find also heralded a new era of astronomy, as researchers now have a new way to study the Universe.
I'm not sure a sound of a ripple in the cosmological constant from two black holes quaifies as a gravitational wave. I am sure the cosmological constant is not a mathmatic demonstration of what is.   If correct and it is a gravitational wave it should be heard on all mass which demonstrates gravity at some point. We will keep our finures crossed.  Validate Einstein's work? F.Y.I. Einstein's work will be validated or corrected by descovery in mathematics changing a theory of times relativity to a mathematic fact of proportional energy, The Law of relativity.  

The validation of Einstein's contribution will be made in that General Relativity clearly establishes that Pi is responsible for the crossing of time zones. Keeping in mind that the mathematic creation of time using the Pythagorean Theorem set lines around the Earth as a circumference in contradiction to those magnetic North and South Pole circumference in the use of the compass for navigation.Every wave form is a cross section of a circle and is described by a measurement of circumference of some kind when it comes to light.

To answer a complex question in a simple way Pi is found with division therefore it can also be found with basic multiplication. We do not find the circles circumference by multiplying we find Pi again by the process of multiplying. Time is never infinite as a mathematical law of its findings a curved line does not extend forever it can only complete an orbit where energy only expands the circumference till the curve is broken or creates an oval till the curve is broken.
#146
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,597
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8

Quantum Leap is a great TV show.
#147
John_C_87
John_C_87's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 287
0
2
5
John_C_87's avatar
John_C_87
0
2
5
-->
@FLRW
Quantum Leap is a great TV show.
It is very entertaining.
Topic's author
#148
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,920
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@John_C_87
...Time is never infinite.....
1} I agree with your above, with the caveat that there is no sum-total to observed times dimension as quanta { etc } ergo, observed time eternally exists, if, our physical reality { specific invaginated occupied space } eternally exists.

John, below i post most interesting vid by Sean Carrol below, that you may have missed. It is very clear, linear progression of how the maths of General Relativity came to exist. You may like it.

I recently posted the following in Science Without all of the Gobbldee Gook. Hope I dont get in trouble for the repost here. I need to watch it again to better direct you or others to the relevant to time as dimension points --if there are any-- and of signifcance { if any }.

I watched all of this vid. I'm curious as to what exactly the 8, in relativity formula. 8pi GT uv i.e. why the 8?  I of course want to see if my it can easily be related to my invaginated, Quantum Space-time Tori. The most obvious thing, is that is there is the primary set of four circle planes for each tori and if we have two of them at 90 degrees to each other, then we have 8 sets of pi, and we had four of those planes being the physical reality inside the tube, as a two sine-waves at 90 degrees to each other, ergo, the pattern for electro-magnetic radiation { photons ergo speed of radiation } 


#149
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,669
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@FLRW
In 2016, scientists announced they had directly detected gravitational waves, literal ripples in the fabric of spacetime.
They spent 40 years and over a billion dollars looking for the 2.5 mile distance between the arms of the LIGO interferometer to change by about a thousandth of the diameter of a proton, of course they found it.  You don't spend a billion dollars and come back with "oops".

It was a huge validation of Einstein’s work, which had predicted their existence almost exactly 100 years prior.
Of course, we have already validated the living shit out of Einstein's theories of relativity, this was just the last prediction to be "validated".  Perhaps this development is one of those "much ado about nothing" things.  

The find also heralded a new era of astronomy, as researchers now have a new way to study the Universe.
I'm not sure how finding a blip the size of a thousandth of the diameter of a proton every forty years constitutes a "new way to study the Universe" or "heralds a new era of astronomy" but hey, after you spend a billion dollars you just have to say stuff like that.  

Being a statistical metric, the confidence level of a single measurement yields 0 degrees of confidence. 


#150
John_C_87
John_C_87's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 287
0
2
5
John_C_87's avatar
John_C_87
0
2
5
-->
@ebuc
Nice link thank you enjoyed it very much and am adding the book to my wish list....

I take the 8 as part of the Unit circle in algebra. As you know I am not a fan of Pi in any way shape or from and replaced it with a formula for finding a chord length where the radius of a circle becomes a hypotenuse of a right angle.  By doing this we can mathematically describe time zones relative to energy. Again, gravity as a law of motion is then used and is a directional force which creates mass and heat. As a law of motion gravity is formed from three types of motion made throughout the universe and not a force of energy created from the universe itself as a energy wave. I read something about it when going over some of Newton's work but in honesty do not remember details about it.