Empirical evidence hasconsistently linked low intelligence with prejudiceThe op who proved at least 27% of African Americans are racist, likely agrees with this conclusion.
I don't believe in races.Lol.Race is only a social construct, it is not a biological attribute or a category of human genetic variation.You're extremely wrong.Human populations separate throughout history, and thus evolve into physically and genetically distinguishable groups (i.e. "races") due to adapting to different environments and interbreeding. When you say race is "only" a social construct, you are denying that this divergent evolution happened in humans. You're arguing that despite being separated, adapting to different environments and also interbreeding within the group, all of those separated groups of humans ended up *precisely* the same. You really expect us to believe that?Skin color is first determined at birth by genetics/hormones (inherited through your parents). Unless you want to argue that skin color doesn't exist or everyone paints it somehow before they're born (wtf), differing skin colors clearly demonstrates genetic variation as a racial phenotype (i.e. human race).I won't go hard into the science, but there's enough genetic variation within humans to have subspecies (Read Table 2 from this source comparing fst values of humans to other species who do have subspecies): Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications (wordpress.com) ) , and genetic clustedness separates humans into distinct racial groups (even at rather low SNP/loci totals (100-160) with K only being set to 3 -- Asian, African and European): Human Population Genetic Structure and Inference of Group Membership - PMC (nih.gov) .So, hopefully you have a better idea of how extremely wrong your sentence was.
Oh look, a white supremacist with alternative facts about race, that's not something you see every day.Oh wait, yes it is.
Oh look, a white supremacist with alternative facts about race, that's not something you see every day.Oh wait, yes it is.
They mistake it for being clever too while it's clear enough to the rest of us that it's some lack that's driven them to accrue this whole shitheap of studied obnoxiousness via internet hate browsing.
Was just a very pathetic attempt, hence you got ghosted. Better get used to it.
You've actually got to be on spectrum, right, or are you ashamed to admit it?
UK
I don't believe in races.Lol.Race is only a social construct, it is not a biological attribute or a category of human genetic variation.You're extremely wrong.Human populations separate throughout history, and thus evolve into physically and genetically distinguishable groups (i.e. "races") due to adapting to different environments and interbreeding. When you say race is "only" a social construct, you are denying that this divergent evolution happened in humans. You're arguing that despite being separated, adapting to different environments and also interbreeding within the group, all of those separated groups of humans ended up *precisely* the same. You really expect us to believe that?Skin color is first determined at birth by genetics/hormones (inherited through your parents). Unless you want to argue that skin color doesn't exist or everyone paints it somehow before they're born (wtf), differing skin colors clearly demonstrates genetic variation as a racial phenotype (i.e. human race).I won't go hard into the science, but there's enough genetic variation within humans to have subspecies (Read Table 2 from this source comparing fst values of humans to other species who do have subspecies): Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications (wordpress.com) ) , and genetic clustedness separates humans into distinct racial groups (even at rather low SNP/loci totals (100-160) with K only being set to 3 -- Asian, African and European): Human Population Genetic Structure and Inference of Group Membership - PMC (nih.gov) .So, hopefully you have a better idea of how extremely wrong your sentence was.Oh look, a white supremacist with alternative facts about race, that's not something you see every day.Oh wait, yes it is.
Oh look, a white supremacist with alternative facts about race, that's not something you see every day.Oh wait, yes it is.Typical intellectual c0ward retort. Can’t refute anything put forth so you drop the libtard “white supremacist” ad hominem. 🙄
They mistake it for being clever too while it's clear enough to the rest of us that it's some lack that's driven them to accrue this whole shitheap of studied obnoxiousness via internet hate browsing.Two of the same peas 🫛 whining about facts they cannot discredit, so out come the ad hominem bombs. Pathetic intellectual cowardice.
We don't have a reliable way of knowing how people perceived what was presented to them, or why they answered it.
Is it ethical for black people to not be African.
They mistake it for being clever too while it's clear enough to the rest of us that it's some lack that's driven them to accrue this whole shitheap of studied obnoxiousness via internet hate browsing.
The correct response is to point out that the pollsters asked about 100 African Americans the following question.
Do you agree with the phrase "It's okay to be white"They didn't ask respondents if it was okay to be white, but basically how they feel about a phrase that the media has spun as a dog whistle for white supremacists.
Re-reading this I'm actually positive TWS took me up wrong on purpose and sent me away on that tangent, which is honestly impressive.
As a White nationalist, I'm completely capable of agreeing with the statement that 'Black lives matter',
Oh look, a white supremacist with alternative facts about race, that's not something you see every day.Oh wait, yes it is.
As a white nationalist you should know that niggers have an average IQ of 85 at best. This means they are likely not capable of having your ability to effectively use logic. They instead may have an emotional response that made them give a response that doesn't accurately portray how they feel about honkeys.
Your own arguments about their impulsivity and and low IQ should inform you that they are more likely to have an emotional response to questions about how they feel about the phrase, and remember they were asked how they feel about the phrase, not how they feel about crackers
Is the nerd rant really that frequent in your culture? Ordinarily, I would never see that as a cover to the book. I perceived it as fringe behavior.
Prez seems to understand the low-class 'shit talking' that real people sling around.
Yep, PREZ definately knows shit talking
Prez seems to understand the low-class 'shit talking' that real people sling around.
Firstly, I don't think we should be calling them that word. There is no use or need to unnecessarily antagonize African Americans.
Impulsivity and comprehension are not interchangeable terms
>@KaitlynFirstly, I don't think we should be calling them that word. There is no use or need to unnecessarily antagonize African Americans.I have had sex with black chick in the past as I have explained in other posts, I get a pass.
Big deal. So have I. And a Hispanic chick. A fat chick. A skinny 2x4 chick. Gorgeous chicks. One ugly chick. And several beautiful voluptuous chicks. Doesn’t mean I (or anyone else for that matter) gets a pass to refer to them with ANY heinous derogatory terms like N****r, Sp*ck, so on and so forth.
Firstly, I don't think we should be calling them that word. There is no use or need to unnecessarily antagonize African Americans.I have had sex with black chick in the past as I have explained in other posts, I get a pass.My use of crude language wasn't accidental. If you hear a pollster ask "How do you feel about the phrase "it is okay to be white" you will probably have a more emotional response than other questions.Let's be honest they asked how do you feel about that phrase as opposed to asking how do you feel about white people, because they already intuited it would get a more favorable response that they were looking for.The Crude language was meant to pull at you emotionally. Even most self proclaimed white nationalist cringe when they see. Or hear the word nigger. A statement like "It's okay to be white" where trolls have also left images of. Swastikas and other hateful material around could evoke an emotional response.
People are less likely to be perfectly rational when they are emotional. You are a woman, so you understand this. Men are taught to suppress their emotions, but women generally don't get the same pressureIf I get you emotional and ask you a question, you will answer differently depending on how you feel. If you are mad at your significant other, you may yell that you hate his guts, if I give you an orgasm you might scream that you love me.Your most logical and honest answer will not be when I make you horny or angry. It will be when you are in an unemotional state.The statement due to the media attention that surrounds it, evokes an emotional response where answers are more likely out of anger.
Why did 50% answer in a way that seems less racist?Well I believe this was a phone poll, so most likely an older demographic that isn't terminally online meaning those 50% perhaps have not heard the phrase, perhaps that 50% is more rational and in control of their emotions than the rest.The 27% are perhaps mostly from a younger demographic or seen posters with swastikas nearby in their neighborhood or something that made them emotional before responding. Maybe only half of that 27% is racist. The unsure ones, given it is a phone poll I could see myself landing on that listPollster calling me on my lunch break:"What do you feel about the phrase It's okay to be white"Realistic response by me on the phone"I don't know man, like I don't give a shit about the phrase"Pollster checks box next to unsure
The poll doesn't mean as much as the polls using more neutral language which are also available.Now if they asked me"Scale of 1 to 10, how much do you like black people"I would probably be like "I don't know 5, unless I just finished watching rocky then it's like 3, "
It's just we want people thinking critically in this thread).
