The transgenderism debate

Author: YouFound_Lxam

Posts

Total: 673
ludofl3x
ludofl3x's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,071
3
2
2
ludofl3x's avatar
ludofl3x
3
2
2
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
So why the push for this transgender ideology?
I don't see a "push" for "transgender ideology" anywhere. To me, a business hanging a LGBTQ+ symbol in their window isn't a push for an ideology. It's saying we don't care if you're gay, you can buy muffins here if you're one of these groups. I don't see protests all over the place, not sure where you live that you do. Florida maybe?

 If an ideology is preaching, that men can be women, men can menstruate, men can go into women's bathrooms, men can compete against women in sports, theirs are more than two genders, etc. then that is going to shut down society very fast. I hope I don't need to explain how that is bad
Sorry, but you do. How does this "shut down" society? The rest of the Hitler stuff is a ridiculous comp. Too ridiculous to even address. 

"It has been reported that Governor Jerry Brown signed into a law that would make it a crime to “willfully and repeatedly” decline to use a senior transgender patient’s “preferred name or pronouns.”  SB 179 (“Gender Recognition Act”) was signed into law back in October. The law will allow individuals to update state-issued identification documents (including birth certificates, state identification cards, and driver’s licenses) to select “nonbinary” as their gender."

""It shall be unlawful for a long-term care facility or facility staff to take any of the following actions wholly or partially on the basis of a person’s actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status," the bill reads."
I looked into both of these in earlier discussions and never denied they existed; I said I can't find any instances of anyone being fined or criminally charged under these laws. Sounds like it addressed a problem that didn't exist and doesn't exist today. 

Making pornographic books, and comic books and putting them in kids elementary, middle and high schools. That is not pedophillia?
No, it is not, actually. 

Not sex education. They are talking to them about sexual attraction. Who they are attracted to at young ages, and why they are. They are talking to kids about how to give concent. If that is not pedophillia then I don't know what is. 
I agree, you don't seem to know what pedophilia is. 

KIDS SHOULD NOT BE TAUGHT ABOUT WHO THEY ARE SEXUALLY ATTRACTED TO!
Kids (especially elementary schoolers) shouldn't need to know about that. THEY ARE KIDS FOR CHRISTS SAKE
Elementary school children have sexual urges, guy. Why should they not understand them? Why don't they need to know that it's fine to have these urges?

I was going to address more of your post but it seems we've been over that ground. Can you please tell me how do you solve your perceived 'promotion of the transgender ideology' satisfactorily. What would you like specific people to stop doing specifically. What should the transgender community stop doing that is currently 'advancing their agenda'?
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 5,260
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
It goes against science and biology, because science and biology state with empirical evidence that there are men and their are women. Men have a penis and testes, different body structure, and more testosterone in the body than females. Females have a vagina, ovary's, and a different body structure, and more osterigin than males.

The transgenderism ideology denies this biological fact.
"Transgenderism" has nothing to do with science and biology.

You know who else agrees? Your own source:

"Transgender ideology is a controversial topic with opposing viewpoints1234. Proponents of the ideology believe that gender identity is as important as biological sex and that trans people should be regarded as the gender with which they identify13.
If one thing is "as important as"  something else, then by definition, they are two different things.

To regard one thing as another is to treat them as if they are the same. It is not a belief that they are the same.

Your argument against transgenderism is at its core just one big strawman.
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 5,260
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@cristo71
Because it is an incoherent ideology
What is incoherent about it?
ludofl3x
ludofl3x's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,071
3
2
2
ludofl3x's avatar
ludofl3x
3
2
2
Here, earlier, you said this:

Simple. Stop promoting this to kids. Stop promoting this ideology. That is the solution. 
To whom is this addressed?

Also, teaching kids about consent, about sexual attraction, and about their genitals has nothing to do with transgenderism. Not sure why you brought it up, can you clarify the connection? Because it sounds like you're really against pedophilia (same here, except I'm against what's actually pedophilia, not children getting fulsome and accurate sex education from an early age) and teaching kids about sex overall. Neither of those are in any way tied to transgenderism.
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
-->
@ludofl3x
I don't see a "push" for "transgender ideology" anywhere.
This statement alone just proves how uneducated you are on this topic. 

Sorry, but you do. How does this "shut down" society? The rest of the Hitler stuff is a ridiculous comp. Too ridiculous to even address. 
First of all, anything is addressable. The more stupid it is the easier it is to address, so why are you having a problem addressing that?

Second of all, teaching society that men can menstruate is a big problem. All the things I stated are not fact, and are delusional. When society promotes and teaches delusion, that shows others like China and Russia that we are no longer a threat and easily confused and manipulated. It also gives the higher government elites dictator like power over the people. Whatever they say will go, without resistance. 

I looked into both of these in earlier discussions and never denied they existed; I said I can't find any instances of anyone being fined or criminally charged under these laws. Sounds like it addressed a problem that didn't exist and doesn't exist today. 
Yea, and I didn't say anyone has been fined or charged for it, I just stated that California has made that a law. That is called taking away free speech. 

No, it is not, actually. 
Explain yourself dude. Let me ask again:
SHOWING PORNOGRAPHIC BOOKS TO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL KIDS IS NOT PEDOPHILIA??

I agree, you don't seem to know what pedophilia is. 
Do I really have to show you the deffinition of pedophillia like a child. 

Pedophillia: a specific disorder where there is a preference for sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children.

Sexual activity can actually include talking about sexual preferences in detail, and showing other pornographic material. 
Talking in certain ways is actually considered sexual activity. That's why you can actually be arrested for talking to kids in sexual ways. Even if it wasn't thought that is still very horrible. 

Elementary school children have sexual urges, guy. Why should they not understand them? Why don't they need to know that it's fine to have these urges?
You know, I thought you were a reasonable guy, but after a comment like that, I think you might actually be a pedophile. 

I was going to address more of your post but it seems we've been over that ground. Can you please tell me how do you solve your perceived 'promotion of the transgender ideology' satisfactorily. What would you like specific people to stop doing specifically. What should the transgender community stop doing that is currently 'advancing their agenda'?
I already answered your question in my last post.

To whom is this addressed?
The media, schools, children's shows, entertainment etc. 

Also, teaching kids about consent, about sexual attraction, and about their genitals has nothing to do with transgenderism.
Yes it does. If a boy thinks he is a girl and wants a vagina, then you have to talk to a child about genitals, or just don't be a creep. 

same here, except I'm against what's actually pedophilia, not children getting fulsome and accurate sex education from an early age
That is pedophilic behavior. 

and teaching kids about sex overall.
Why. Just why. 



YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
-->
@Double_R
"Transgenderism" has nothing to do with science and biology.

You know who else agrees? Your own source:

"Transgender ideology is a controversial topic with opposing viewpoints1234. Proponents of the ideology believe that gender identity is as important as biological sex and that trans people should be regarded as the gender with which they identify13.
That source wasn't to prove transgenderism wrong, only to prove that it is an ideology. 

If one thing is "as important as"  something else, then by definition, they are two different things.
Let me explain this to you. 

Yes Gender and Sex are not entirely the same. This statement is true. But the idea of gender/gender roles is based off of sex.

Gender is a social construct. Social constructs must be based off of something, otherwise it is a social construct without construction. 
Just like money. Money is a social construct based off of the buying, selling, and trading of humans. Money is based off of that.

Gender is based off of sex. And there are only two sex's theirfore only two gender roles, only two genders. If their are more genders, than where did they come from, what are they based off of, and what is the legitimacy of it?
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,610
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
Transgenderism came about during evolution.   Bonobos are an endangered ape species found only in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where they live in small, largely peaceful tribes. Along with chimps, they’re our closest living relatives, which is why the study of their mating habits opens a political minefield. Unlike chimps, bonobos are naturally bisexual—and happily engage in homosexual acts for enjoyment, to solve conflicts, and to get ahead in the tribe. It is interesting to note that
chimpanzee and bonobo males are extraordinarily well endowed in the testicle department.
ludofl3x
ludofl3x's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,071
3
2
2
ludofl3x's avatar
ludofl3x
3
2
2
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
SHOWING PORNOGRAPHIC BOOKS TO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL KIDS IS NOT PEDOPHILIA??
Please give me the titles of these books so we can decide if it's pornography. Hint: Are You THere God It's Me Margaret is not a porno. 

I already answered your question in my last post.
No, what you said was "stop promoting the agenda." I'm asking you what that means in practical terms. Who has to stop doing what. When pressed, you said:

The media, schools, children's shows, entertainment etc. 
What should 'media' specifically STOP doing that's currently seen by you as 'promoting the agenda.' What children's shows are going to make Russia decide it's time to attack us? Which entertainment specifically is China looking at and saying "You know what, two more Sam Smith singles and America will be ready to fall!"? 

You are on the verge of 'raving.'

Second of all, teaching society that men can menstruate is a big problem. 
Who is teaching this? Where?

Elementary school children have sexual urges, guy. Why should they not understand them? Why don't they need to know that it's fine to have these urges?
You know, I thought you were a reasonable guy, but after a comment like that, I think you might actually be a pedophile. ...Talking in certain ways is actually considered sexual activity. That's why you can actually be arrested for talking to kids in sexual ways. Even if it wasn't thought that is still very horrible. 

Sounds like to you, anything to do with sex is scary, and every adult is a predator even if they're just trying to tell you it's not a huge deal if you jerk off when you're horny. Teachers who tell a class of fifth graders that it's okay to have sexual attractions, sexual urges, and if you don't have them, cool, but you will soon so don't freak out, they're not pedophiles and it has NOTHING TO DO WITH TRANSGENDERISM. I'm talking about sex education, and not just from teachers, from parents. THere aren't many states in the union today where you can be arrested for talking about a girl having her period, or lose your job for telling your 10th grade health class it's not a huge deal to be gay. It doesn't make you a pedophile. 

Yes it does. If a boy thinks he is a girl and wants a vagina, then you have to talk to a child about genitals, or just don't be a creep. 
At what age should a girl learn about her period? This is also "talk about genitals." Does that make someone a creep? 

Again it looks to me like most of your issues are about pedophilia and your fear of it becoming somehow pervasive based on transgender people being able to just be transgender people, and anything to do with sex in general. I'm with you on pedophilia. I'm not with you that anything to do with sex = pedophilia, or LGBTQ+ = pedophiles, or what transgender people existing, or denying it, has to do with sex education. You're really just ranting, and I know you keep saying you don't have a problem with LGTBQ+ folks, but honestly it's starting to sound like a bit of a fig leaf for your standard issue bigotry. Same line Christians use against homosexuals: hate the sin not the sinner. Really it's just the sinner they hate, because the sin is none of their business in the first place, if the sin is preferring to present as a woman when you were born with a penis. 
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
-->
@ludofl3x
Please give me the titles of these books so we can decide if it's pornography. Hint: Are You THere God It's Me Margaret is not a porno. 
Look up pornographic books in kids schools on google, and you will find all the books you need. It literally shows sexual acts being performed and talks about sucking d*** and other horrible things of that manner. 

No, what you said was "stop promoting the agenda." I'm asking you what that means in practical terms. Who has to stop doing what. When pressed, you said:

The media, schools, children's shows, entertainment etc. 
What should 'media' specifically STOP doing that's currently seen by you as 'promoting the agenda.' What children's shows are going to make Russia decide it's time to attack us? Which entertainment specifically is China looking at and saying "You know what, two more Sam Smith singles and America will be ready to fall!"? 

You are on the verge of 'raving.'
I don't think you see the bigger picture or the threat of this ideology. Again I say to you, do a dive in history. This ideological warfare was used by many mass murderers to persuade the populous into horrible things. 

The media needs to stop painting transgenderism as a thing we should promote to people. The media needs to stop condemning every single person who disagrees with this narrative. 

Who is teaching this? Where?
In woke college campuses they literally have tampons in men's bathrooms. They also claim men can get pregnant and have periods. You ask me where this is happening, well literally look up what I said what is happening, and in a couple of seconds you will find people claiming this to be true. 

It's not hard to make a google search. 

Teachers who tell a class of fifth graders that it's okay to have sexual attractions, sexual urges, and if you don't have them, cool, but you will soon so don't freak out, they're not pedophiles and it has NOTHING TO DO WITH TRANSGENDERISM.
Why do teachers need to talk to kids about sexual attraction and sexual urges. That is not their job. Their job is to teach math, science, biology, and history. Not teach kids about pronouns, and how to suck other kids d***. 

 I'm talking about sex education, and not just from teachers, from parents. THere aren't many states in the union today where you can be arrested for talking about a girl having her period, or lose your job for telling your 10th grade health class it's not a huge deal to be gay. It doesn't make you a pedophile. 
Yes it is. And I am glad that these states have these laws to protect kids. 

Sex education is only supposed to explain how reproduction works, and how to protect yourself. It does not teach kids explicit sex acts, positions, and unnatural attractions. Sex education is not even supposed to be in elementary and only sometimes is in middle school. It usually takes place in high school when the kids become more mature. 

At what age should a girl learn about her period? This is also "talk about genitals." Does that make someone a creep? 
Talking about your own specific genitals and biological processes that may occur is different from talking about genitals and tying that to sexual acts. 

I'm with you on pedophilia.
You are most definitely not. 
ludofl3x
ludofl3x's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,071
3
2
2
ludofl3x's avatar
ludofl3x
3
2
2
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Okay, thanks for responding. I just don't think you're dealing with reality, I think you have a sadly myopic view of the world, but you can't be blamed, you were groomed for it, right? Indoctrinated by authority at a young age and so on. Good luck on your crusade against all these boogey men and women though!
TWS1405_2
TWS1405_2's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 2,186
3
3
7
TWS1405_2's avatar
TWS1405_2
3
3
7
-->
@badger
Very appropriate response in lieu of a kick in the head.
😂 it would never happen 😆 

YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
-->
@ludofl3x
I thought you would continue to involve yourself in practical arguments. But when you say that teaching 5th graders about sex acts is ok then obviously you are the one not dealing with morality or reality. 

So, in the end, I am the one with the arguments, and you are the one who gave up.
cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,552
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@Double_R
“Because it is an incoherent ideology”
What is incoherent about it?
It is a good start that you recognize that it is an ideology. Coherent ideas can be coherently explained. So, I’ll begin by asking:

When a man identifies as a woman (or vice versa): what does it mean to be a man, what does it mean to be a woman, and what does it mean to identify as a woman?
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 5,260
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Yes Gender and Sex are not entirely the same. This statement is true. But the idea of gender/gender roles is based off of sex.

Gender is a social construct. Social constructs must be based off of something, otherwise it is a social construct without construction...

Gender is based off of sex. And there are only two sex's theirfore only two gender roles, only two genders. If their are more genders, than where did they come from, what are they based off of, and what is the legitimacy of it?
The fact that you are unable to wrap your head around basing gender off of anything but biological sex because that is all that makes sense to you is not an argument that someone else's ideology is also based off of your construct.

Again, you are the one criticizing the ideology you and others labeled "transgenderism", but you repeatedly refuse to acknowledge that the ideology you are criticizing is entirely in your own head. The actual people you point to who you claim hold those idea are talking about something entirely different.

Gender throughout relatively recent human history has been associated largely around certain observable traits we consider to be feminine. They include the way one dresses, carries themselves, appears, and the responsibilities they assume. None of this has anything to do with ones genitals or chromosomes because those are not things we see on the outside in any normal setting.

That's what the LGTBQIA community is actually talking about. Your whole argument is one big strawman.

But it's worse because you are also just factually wrong about the idea that there are only two sexes in any objective sense. There are plenty of real world examples of people born who do not fit neatly into one of your two boxes. I'm not going to explain it to you because it has been explained to you multiple times already. If you suddenly become interested in reality Google "intersex".

Because of this, if your argument is really that there are only two genders because gender is based off off biological sex then even your made up construct is objectively wrong.
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 5,260
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@cristo71
It is a good start that you recognize that it is an ideology. 
Not really, I'm just accepting your premises in order to move onto the part of the conversation worth having.

When a man identifies as a woman (or vice versa): what does it mean to be a man, what does it mean to be a woman, and what does it mean to identify as a woman?
It means the individual lives in accordance with the traits and characteristics we associate with those terms. We tend to think of women as feminine in the way they dress, act, look, and even think. Women tend to be more sensitive, emotional, and even submissive. And yes, we think of women as having breasts and a vagina.

None of these traits alone makes the gender, it's a collection that we base our full picture on.
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@oromagi
  • TRUTH#1:  Transgenderism is not an ideology, it is not a poltical point of view.  Not all transgender people  even view transgenderism as healthy or normal.  You commit the basic fallacy of overgeneralization by assuming that all people who share one psychological trait must also share one political point of view. 
The notion that transgenderism is a valid concept *is* an ideology (or at least part of an ideology). Your assertion that it is true, much as any religious person asserts their God/gods are real, is ideological by nature.

  • Nearly everyone in middle school biology learned that if you’ve got XX chromosomes, you’re a female; if you’ve got XY, you’re a male. This tired simplification is great for teaching the importance of chromosomes but betrays the true nature of biological sex. The popular belief that your sex arises only from your chromosomal makeup is wrong. The truth is, your biological sex isn’t carved in stone, but a living system with the potential for change.
This XX-XY paradigm is accurate for the overwhelming majority of humans on the planet.  Biological sex can be determined from the 1st day of birth (before any socialization can occur) Biological sex affects the neurobiology of autism - PubMed (nih.gov) . The rate at which people don't fit into either category immediately at birth seems to range from 1 in 1667 How common is intersex? | Intersex Society of North America (isna.org) to 1 in 4500 When a Person Is Neither XX nor XY: A Q&A with Geneticist Eric Vilain - Scientific American , and those numbers are reduced to virtually zero with other methods of determining biological sex (of which have 100% accuracy) [Children born with ambiguous genitalia] - PubMed (nih.gov) .

  • And there’s more! While brief and coordinated SRY-activation initiates the process of male-sex differentiation, genes like DMRT1 and FOXL2 maintain certain sexual characteristics during adulthood. If these genes stop functioning, gonads can change and exhibit characteristics of the opposite sex. Without these players constantly active, certain components of your biological sex can change.
Yes, the genetic makeup of your biology can change that way, but this isn't a case for transgenderism. You don't become the opposite biological sex due to activation/de-activation of a couple genes. Women don't become men when they reach menopause. Men don't become women when they take too many steroids and cause their testicles to drastically reduce/halt semen production.

  • When the biology gets too complicated, some point to differences between brains of males and females as proof of the sexual binary. But a half century of empirical research has repeatedly challenged the idea that brain biology is simply XY = male brain or XX = female brain. In other words, there is no such thing as “the male brain” or “the female brain.” This is not to say that there are no observable differences. Certain brain characteristics can be sexually dimorphic: observable average differences across males and females. But like biological sex, pointing to “brain sex” as the explanation for these differences is wrong and hinders scientific research.
Embedded within this paragraph is a concession that contradicts the argument: "observable average differences across males and females". That's precisely what you would find if there were biological differences between men and women.

It is unnecessary to demonstrate that every human male has exactly the same brain, and every human female has exactly the same brain, in order to conclude that there are male and female brains.

  • Let’s just take the most famous example of sexual dimorphism in the brain: the sexually dimorphic nucleus of the preoptic area (sdnPOA). This tiny brain area with a disproportionately sized name is slightly larger in males than in females. But it’s unclear if that size difference indicates distinctly wired sdnPOAs in males versus females, or if—as with the bipotential primordium—the same wiring is functionally weighted toward opposite ends of a spectrum. Throw in the observation that the sdnPOA in gay men is closer to that of straight females than straight males, and the idea of “the male brain” falls apart.
  • Trying to link sex, sex chromosomes and sexual dimorphism is also useless for understanding other brain properties. The hormone vasopressin is dimorphic but is linked to both behavioral differences and similarities across sex. Simply put, the idea of a sexual binary isn’t scientifically useful, and nowhere is this more obvious than in the brain. It also happens that transgender people have the brains to prove it.
"Gay men" are biologically distinct from straight men, so it should be expected that particular parts of their biology would differ from straight men's. Agreeing with this does not refute the notion of male and female brains.

Furthermore, as you alluded to in your above quoted paragraph, there are "observable average differences across males and females", and this very much applies to the brain.

Using neuroimaging, multiple sex differences were found:

(1) For all structures of the brain, male volumes were greater than females
(2) The grey/white matter ratio was consistently higher across structures in women and men


Malebrains during development are structured to facilitate within-lobeand within-hemisphere connectivity, with networks that aretransitive, modular, and discrete, whereas female brains have greaterinterhemispheric connectivity and greater cross-hemisphericparticipation. This neuro-connective difference can be displayed visually as such: pnas.1316909110fig02.jpeg (745×1280) .  Besides this empirical evidence for female-male differences, there are also the resulting differences in abilities that the female-male brain paradigm provides predictive validity for: Males having better motor and spatial abilities, proclivity towards physical aggression, males having larger crania and a higher percentage of white matter (relative to crania size); females have superior memory and social cognition skills, and enhanced verbally mediated memories Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain | PNAS


Again, for another study that tested for cognitive ability, performance was sexually modulated and most sex differences were apparent by early adolescence (i.e. when the hormones started to kick in):

" Malesare more variable on most measures of quantitative and visuospatialability, which necessarily results in more males at both high- andlow-ability extremes. Females tend to excel in verbal abilities, withlarge differences between females and males found when assessmentsinclude writing samples. High-level achievement in science and mathrequires the ability to communicate effectively and comprehendabstract ideas, so the female advantage in writing should be helpfulin all academic domains. Malesoutperform females on most measures of visuospatial abilities, whichhave been implicated as contributing to sex differences onstandardized exams in mathematics and science."



There's just so much literature to support the notion of the female-male brain paradigm. There are further documented empirical, sex-based differences in:

You could also explore the chemical, hormonal, emotion processing and more functional differences between female and male brains:

Chemicaldifferences

  • The male brain secretes less serotonin than the female, which makes males more impulsive in general
  • Oxytocin is found more readily in females, meaning that they are more capable of quick, immediate empathetic responses
Hormonaldifferences

  • Females are dominated by estrogen and progesterone (bonding and growth hormone), males testosterone (growth, sex-drive and aggression)
  • Males receive five to seven spikes/surges of testosterone an hour. These induce a call for action, a change in mood and sometimes erections
  • Female testosterone spikes happen about twice a day, often in the late afternoon or evening
  • Female estrogen and progesterone rise and dive with mood swings.
  • When female estrogen is high, females score better on both standardized and in-class tests. Males, when testosterone is high, do better in spatial tests but poorer in verbalization ones
Functionaldifferences

  • The resting female brain is as active as the activated male brain
  • Females tend to have trouble sleeping and will often sleep-talk
  • Male brains tend to pause after tasks
  • Females have better memory and sensory intake
  • Males see better than females in bright light
Differencesin processing emotion

  • Females process emotions in a more complete fashion than males do
  • Males, in aggression and withdrawal, short-circuit intellectual and academic learning (emotive responses take longer and involve less reasoning)

Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@oromagi
  • It’s easy to see sexual dimorphisms and conclude that the brain is binary; easy, but wrong. Thanks to the participation of trans people in research, we have expanded our understanding of how brain structure, sex and gender interact. For some properties like brain volume and connectivity, trans people possessed values in between those typical of cisgender males and females, both before and after transitioning. Another study found that for certain brain regions, trans individuals appeared similar to cis-individuals with the same gender identity. In that same study, researchers found specific areas of the brain where trans people seemed closer to those with the same assigned sex at birth. Other researchers discovered that trans people have unique structural differences from cis-individuals.
I mostly agree with this. Transgender brains are functionally different from normal people, and that's because they have a mental illness. 

  • As if the brain and body weren’t complicated enough, another biological factor influences the expression of biological sex in an individual: hormones. Anyone who has gone through puberty has felt the power of hormones firsthand. But like all things biology, hormones cannot be limited to the pubescent idea of “estrogen = female and testosterone = male.”
I don't think most people are seriously making the argument "estrogen = female; testosterone = male". If they are, it's not correct.

But it's clearly true that females and males have differing levels of both chemicals.

I've already addressed hormonal differences above (under the appropriate heading).

  • And while testosterone exhibits the largest difference between adult males and females, heritability studies have found that genetics (X vs. Y) only explains about 56 percent of an individual’s testosterone, suggesting many other influences on hormones. Furthermore, measurements of sex hormones levels in any one individual wildly vary across the range of “average” values regardless of how close or spread apart you take the measurements. The binary sex model not only insufficiently predicts the presence of hormones but is useless in describing factors that influence them.
No one is arguing that testosterone levels are the only indication of biological sex. No one is arguing that sex hormones are precisely the same throughout a person's life, either. Sexual differences are an amalgamation of brain structure, chemical, physiological, behavioral etc. differences which allows us to conclude that there are real biological differences between males and females. 
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@Double_R
The fact that you are unable to wrap your head around basing gender off of anything but biological sex
That is the only sensible way to determine gender, otherwise it becomes a 'be-whatever-you-feel-like' fantasy that isn't underpinned with biological reality.

Gender throughout relatively recent human history has been associated largely around certain observable traits we consider to be feminine. They include the way one dresses, carries themselves, appears, and the responsibilities they assume. None of this has anything to do with ones genitals or chromosomes because those are not things we see on the outside in any normal setting.
The whole notion of "feminine" is a conscious extrapolation of the biological female, of which there are attempts to align female biology with usefulness in the real world. The notion didn't exist until there were biological females -- that's the necessary precedent. Otherwise, you're implying that people randomly came up with the idea of feminine, that feminine tasks had no underpinning in female behavior or desires -- a profoundly unlikely suggestion.

So, "feminine" has EVERYTHING to do with "one's genitals and chromosomes" (in order words: biological sex), because that is how what is feminine is attempted to be determined in the first place.

But it's worse because you are also just factually wrong about the idea that there are only two sexes in any objective sense. There are plenty of real world examples of people born who do not fit neatly into one of your two boxes. I'm not going to explain it to you because it has been explained to you multiple times already. If you suddenly become interested in reality Google "intersex".
These are biological aberrations which do not constitute the necessity for a kaleidoscope of "genders". Besides, the rate at which people don't fit into either category immediately at birth seems to range from 1 in 1667 How common is intersex? | Intersex Society of North America (isna.org) to 1 in 4500 When a Person Is Neither XX nor XY: A Q&A with Geneticist Eric Vilain - Scientific American , and those numbers are reduced to virtually zero with other methods of determining biological sex (of which have 100% accuracy) [Children born with ambiguous genitalia] - PubMed (nih.gov) . 

In other words, people (at birth) not fitting into either the XX or XY category are quite low, and people can be placed into XX or XY after birth with various behavioural observations.
cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,552
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@Double_R
It means the individual lives in accordance with the traits and characteristics we associate with those terms. We tend to think of women as feminine in the way they dress, act, look, and even think. Women tend to be more sensitive, emotional, and even submissive. And yes, we think of women as having breasts and a vagina. 

None of these traits alone makes the gender, it's a collection that we base our full picture on.
If that person does not live in accordance with those traits associated with women, then that person is not a woman?

What’s the difference between an effeminate man (one who lives in accordance with traits associated with women) and a male who identifies as a woman?




Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,669
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
How does transgenderism benefit society? I don't think it does, at least not in any way you'd find beneficial, but I also don't see it as deleterious to society either. It's benign at worst. 
Ok, so it doesn't benefit society. 

So if transgenderism doesn't benefit society, and we don't need it, then why the big push for this ideology? They have all the rights that we have, and all the same freedoms, so there's no need to protest that. So why the push for this transgender ideology?
I’m not sure there is a “push” for this “ideology”, but lets say there is, what are you proposing as a solution?    Let’s say you convince the whole world to see it your way, we put you in charge of resolving the problem and give you complete authority, what are you gonna do?

Okay, so it's an ideology that's proposing an idea. What rights of yours are being infringed upon, or do you FEAR will be infringed upon? 
How did Hitler gain power?
Through media influence. That was the main reason he gained control and persuaded the German people to follow along with his plan. He preached world peace and he even claimed what world leaders are claiming today, that we would save the environment. 
I hope you aren’t proposing we put transgender people in concentration camps, you don’t have a “final solution” in mind do you?

No Germans rights were being infringed upon, but society still fell, and because of society's collapse, that is what eventually infringed on their own rights. Same thing is happening now. Again, it's not the LGBTQ community. It is the transgender ideology. 

It's common sense of why it is bad for society. If an ideology is preaching, that men can be women, men can menstruate, men can go into women's bathrooms, men can compete against women in sports, theirs are more than two genders, etc. then that is going to shut down society very fast. I hope I don't need to explain how that is bad. 
You seriously want us to think that less than one half of one percent of the population believing that men can be women and women can be men, will shut down society.  I think we get why society shutting down is bad, but please explain exactly how this belief held by half of one percent of the population will cause “society’s collapse”.  Do you think these people are Gods, are they superhuman, how on earth does such a small percent of the population thinking they can change genders, bring about society's collapse?

I cannot find anyone in California who's ever been arrested for misgendering someone. Or even fined under the California law. If this ever happened, I feel like at least ONE conservative news outlet would have made a crusade out of it, but it doesn't seem to have ever happened. 
"It has been reported that Governor Jerry Brown signed into a law that would make it a crime to “willfully and repeatedly” decline to use a senior transgender patient’s “preferred name or pronouns.”  SB 179 (“Gender Recognition Act”) was signed into law back in October. The law will allow individuals to update state-issued identification documents (including birth certificates, state identification cards, and driver’s licenses) to select “nonbinary” as their gender."

""It shall be unlawful for a long-term care facility or facility staff to take any of the following actions wholly or partially on the basis of a person’s actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status," the bill reads."
Unless you work in a long term care facility in California, so what?  If a person tells me they prefer I use a different pronoun, ok, I’ll try to remember, probably won’t, but I’ll try, why not.  Is this something to get upset about, because one in 200 people prefer another pronoun?  There is so much going on we should give a shit about, why on earth are you gonna use up head space on that?

That's not what pedophilia is, not remotely.
Talking to kids about consent. Talking to kids about genitals in a sexual way. Making pornographic books, and comic books and putting them in kids elementary, middle and high schools. That is not pedophillia?
Is that what’shappening, then damn, I must have missed that episode, got a link to read orsomething?

Adults talking to kids about consent is sex education and not pedophilia.
Not sex education. They are talking to them about sexual attraction. Who they are attracted to at young ages, and why they are. They are talking to kids about how to give concent. If that is not pedophillia then I don't know what is. 
Gotevidence, examples, numbers, anything other than rhetoric? Evenso, sounds closer to sex education than it does pedophilia, doesn’t soundappropriate to me, but if some parents want their kids learning in that way,who are we to infringe upon their rights?

Adults talking to kids about whoever they're sexually attracted to, in the context of "you like what you like, it doesn't make you a freak or any less worthy of respect" is not pedophilia. 
KIDS SHOULD NOT BE TAUGHT ABOUT WHO THEY ARE SEXUALLY ATTRACTED TO!
Kids (especially elementary schoolers) shouldn't need to know about that. THEY ARE KIDS FOR CHRISTS SAKE. 

If you think that kids will understand when they are taught about pronouns, consent, sexual identity, and sexual attraction, then you are mistaken. They are kids and don't need to know about that. Stop sexualizing the kids. Leave them alone. 
OK,so you are making the case for giving the state authority over parents in howthey raise their kids?  How would you goabout exerting this control, practically speaking, how does the state limit go about limiting thier freedomto raise their kids the way they think is best?

No reputable news organization I can find is reporting this, and it doesn't make any sense on the surface. How would a child pay for this procedure, for one. It sounds like the kind of thing that one of your self-selecting news outlets would turn into a clickbait headline.
"Vulnerable House and Senate Democrats refuse to say whether they support gender reassignment surgery for minors and if the controversial procedure should be allowed without parental consent, despite recent concerns over the issue."
Politiciansthat won’t take a stand on a controversial issue, really, and what are youproposing to solve this crisis?  Mandatory issue position taking for politicians?

"Washington State could soon require youth shelters to hide minors who run away from home in order to obtain an abortion or sex change operations without parental consent."
Ithink that’s fucked up, but they are calling it an “attack on parents’ rights”,aren’t you also suggesting an attack on parent’s rights to take their kids to aTrans Storybook Reading, I think only ann asshole would, but I think they havethe right to be an asshole.

Now, WHAT IS THE SOLUTION for the problem you see? I'm not saying you need to have written a bill that could pass a state legislature. I'm saying you see a problem, and it bothers you quite a bit, so you must have an ideal solution in mind. What is it? What does it look like in the broadest terms?
Simple. Stop promoting this to kids. Stop promoting this ideology. That is the solution. 

“Stop it” isn’t a solution, it’s a wish, remember, we put you in charge, you have full authority, tell us how you are going to “stop” it?
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,986
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Sidewalker
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,669
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
I think you are talking about "Drag Story Hour", it's hard to tell through all the alarmist rhetoric.

If so, then you are confusing Drag, with Transgender, they aren't the same thing by any stretch.
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,669
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@Greyparrot
That is hilarious.

So the host guy, is that the guy that used to do the Ultra Spiritual Goy thing? 

Looks like him, he was hilarious.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,986
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Sidewalker
I just had a huge fight with my roommate because he was trying to convince me that all 100% humans will be extinct soon because of global warming of 4 degrees.

sigh.
TWS1405_2
TWS1405_2's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 2,186
3
3
7
TWS1405_2's avatar
TWS1405_2
3
3
7
-->
@Sidewalker
🐓 💩 
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
-->
@Double_R
The fact that you are unable to wrap your head around basing gender off of anything but biological sex because that is all that makes sense to you is not an argument that someone else's ideology is also based off of your construct.
Ok, what is it based on then?

Again, you are the one criticizing the ideology you and others labeled "transgenderism", but you repeatedly refuse to acknowledge that the ideology you are criticizing is entirely in your own head. The actual people you point to who you claim hold those idea are talking about something entirely different.
Really? Because I go off of transgender people's argument, and all of them agree with the ideology I have described. 

Gender throughout relatively recent human history has been associated largely around certain observable traits we consider to be feminine. 
No, gender up until recently has been defined as what you are born as. I think you mean gender roles, define femininity and masculinity. 

They include the way one dresses, carries themselves, appears, and the responsibilities they assume. None of this has anything to do with ones genitals or chromosomes because those are not things we see on the outside in any normal setting.
Yes, it does, because gender roles typically tend to match someone's biological sex. Not always, but most of the time it does. 

That's what the LGTBQIA community is actually talking about. Your whole argument is one big strawman.
This community has literally said, men can menstruate, men can get pregnant, men can become women, and women can become men. 
That is what they claimed, not what I said they claimed. 

But it's worse because you are also just factually wrong about the idea that there are only two sexes in any objective sense. There are plenty of real world examples of people born who do not fit neatly into one of your two boxes. I'm not going to explain it to you because it has been explained to you multiple times already. If you suddenly become interested in reality Google "intersex".
Oh my gosh, you with intersex.

Let me ask you a question. If someone is born with one arm, even though humans are typically born with two, does that mean that there is now a spectrum of arms?

Intersex is someone being born, and something went wrong with their biological developmental process in the womb. Even though it is a bit confusing, there are still defining characteristics and traits of all intersex people that define them as either male or female. 

If a third sex were to exist, it would have to have a purpose. Us as humans reproduce with a male and a female, and that's all we need. If another sex were to exist, what would its purpose be, and if it didn't have a purpose, then why didn't evolution take it out?


TWS1405_2
TWS1405_2's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 2,186
3
3
7
TWS1405_2's avatar
TWS1405_2
3
3
7
-->
@Sidewalker
🐓 💩 
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,171
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@FLRW
Transgenderism came about during evolution.   Bonobos are an endangered ape species found only in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where they live in small, largely peaceful tribes. Along with chimps, they’re our closest living relatives, which is why the study of their mating habits opens a political minefield. Unlike chimps, bonobos are naturally bisexual—and happily engage in homosexual acts for enjoyment, to solve conflicts, and to get ahead in the tribe. It is interesting to note that
chimpanzee and bonobo males are extraordinarily well endowed in the testicle department.
Bisexuality is equivalent to transexuality to you?
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,171
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@ludofl3x
Please give me the titles of these books so we can decide if it's pornography. Hint: Are You THere God It's Me Margaret is not a porno. 


oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@YouFound_Lxam

Transgenderism is an ideology and is also a political point of view and, there are many sources to prove this if you would like to check them out:
  • Behind a paywall but the title suggests that there are ideologies regarding gender, not that the condition of Transgenderism itself is itself an ideology.  Do you see the difference?
  • Please don't pretend you want to discuss the modern scientific perspective and then introduce the Southern Baptists as a legit source.  We  Americans officially don't have to give one single fuck what the Southern Baptists.  Those magical claims have no business in any serious discussion of public policy.  If we were able to ask the Transgender community whether the Southern Baptists are a legitimate institution to be consulted for an accuate definition of the Transgender experience what do you think the answer would be?  If we were to ask the Scientfic community whehter the Southern Baptists are a legitimate institution to be consulted for an accurate definition of the Transgender experience what do you think the answer would be.  SInce both groups would obviously say, "oh hell no" let's agree that religious hangups about sex and sex control disqualify all religious opinion from an accurately scientific perspective.
  • Behind a paywall but I doubt the Grey Lady would mistake any adjective for an ideology.
  • In fact, I'm fairly confident that the notion of an ideology of transgenderism originates with the Heritage Foundation.
    • Let's agree that any organizaton that backed Trump's big lie about the 2020 election knowing that the fraud was on Trump's side can no longer be treated as an objective reporter of American political fact. 
    • Organizations like the Heritage Foundation have never pretended to objectivity and may not cited as an objective source for defintion
      • WIKIPEDIA:  The Heritage Foundation has engaged in several activities in opposition to transgender rights, including hosting several anti-transgender rights events, developing and supporting legislation templates against transgender rights,  and making claims about transgender youth healthcare and suicide rates based on internal research, contrary to the findings of peer-reviewed scientific studies.
        • Making up your own internal research, that is truly anti-scientific.  Mainstream science rejects the Heritage Foundation's phony research.
          • The Heritage Foundation defintion claims:
            • Proponents of the ideology believe that
              • gender identity is as important as biological sex  (I've never met anybody who makes this claim)
                • and
              • that trans people should be regarded as the gender with which they identify (basic courtesey, only true assholes fail to respect every citizen's right to name themselves and customize their identity.  In America, one's identify is one's own).
              • So just objectively, Heritage foundation's totally biased definition layers one accusation that's generally false on top of one common courtesy on assholes don't do.

Yes, this is true that not all transgender people view their actions and beliefs and healthy or normal. That is also true for many other beliefs, hobby's, addictions, etc. 
  • Well, then you agree with me that transgenderism is not an ideology and we are both just waiting for you to remove your head from your ass.. 
I did not claim that all people who share one psychological trait must also share one political viewpoint. I didn't even claim that all transgender identifying people share the same political viewpoint. 
  • That is what you are claiming when you call it transgender ideology or an ideology of transgenderism, that's like defining white supremacy as white ideology or the ideology of white people.   SInce you agree with me that whatever you are calling transgender ideology  does not represent all or even a majority of trangendered people, we must rationally agree that you are using a wrong and likely deliberately misleading label for the ideology you oppose.
I only described and defined the transgender ideology (idea).  
  • False.  IF we follow Heritage and say the ideology you oppose claims something like: "gender identity is as important as biological sex,"   than that's a pretty vague and at least superficially false statement.  I don't know anybody who claims the like.  
  • Now, say you were to change that to:
    • As a mattter of public policy, people may choose their gender identity and pursue their happiness therein as they see fit
      • You might call that ideology but as I've said before, that is the US Constitution and upholders of the US Constitution ought not be properly referred to as "transgendered"
  • Let's take a look at how big a problem this ideology you speak of really is.  Please provide 3 examples of political expression of the idea that "gender identity is as important as biological sex,"  that is not merely expressing the idea "that transgender people are entitled to the same civil rights as any other citizen."

  • THIS: " Ideology:  "a set of opinions or beliefs of a group or an individual. The transgender movement is an ideology. So I did describe one. "  It is every bit as fucked up a prejudice to say that all transpeople share a set of beliefs as it is to say that all straight men share one set of beliefs
Again, fallacy of faulty reasoning. 
  • You just agreed with me that not all transpeople share the same set of beliefs.  You forgot to explain what fault you found with my reasoning and you sould also explain why you agree with my faulty reasoning.
Biological truth, Scientific truth, and logic and reasoning. 
  • Sorry buddy,  Coors money and the Southern Baptists ain't any of  that.
From what I remember, I mostly made that thread to let others talk about the issue, not for me specifically to go into deep conversation about it.
  • ah
I don't have a problem with transgender people. I do have a problem in the belief's that they hold, but not the person specifically.
  • But we just agreed that not all transgendered people hold any one belief in common, so how can it be just to eradicate a people based on an ideology held by only some, or even perhaps none?
"the LGBT community and ideology is not healthy for society, and must be eradicated (the ideology, not the people)."
  • and it is just a coincidence that you think that the ideology and the people are one thing?  Otherwise, how could  you call it "the ideology of the Transgenders?" right?
If you're going to be part of honest conversation, at least present my position correctly. 

  • Obviously, eradication is an existential threat. 
Well obviously, either you didn't fully read and understand what I wrote, or your logic is flawed.
  • how so?
Give me a biologist (just one) by name (preferably a trustworthy one) who claims that the ideology of transgenderism lines up with biology. 

  • "The ideology of transgenderism" is your phony claim, not mine.
  • If you were to more directly ask biologists if transgenderims is a biological, most biologists say yes but to an unkown degree.
    • A 2008 study compared the genes of 112 trans women who were mostly already undergoing hormone treatment, with 258 cisgender male controls. Trans women were more likely than cisgender males to have a longer version of a receptor gene (longer repetitions of the gene) for the sex hormone androgen, which reduced its effectiveness at binding testosterone. The androgen receptor (NR3C4) is activated by the binding of testosterone or dihydrotestosterone, where it plays a critical role in the forming of primary and secondary male sex characteristics. The research weakly suggests reduced androgen and androgen signaling contributes to trans women's identity. The authors say that a decrease in testosterone levels in the brain during development might prevent complete masculinization of trans women's brains, thereby causing a more feminized brain and a female gender identity.
    • A variant genotype for the CYP17 gene, which acts on the sex hormones pregnenolone and progesterone, has been found to be linked to transsexuality in trans men but not in trans women. Most notably, transmasculine subjects not only had the variant genotype more frequently, but had an allele distribution equivalent to cisgender male controls, unlike the cisgender female controls. The paper concluded that the loss of a female-specific CYP17 T -34C allele distribution pattern is associated with transmasculinity.
    • Gender incongruence among twins
      • In 2013, a twin study combined a survey of pairs of twins where one or both had undergone, or had plans and medical approval to undergo, gender transition, with a literature review of published reports of transgender twins. The study found that one third of identical twin pairs in the sample were both transgender: 13 of 39 (33%) monozygotic or identical pairs of assigned males and 8 of 35 (22.8%) pairs of assigned females. Among dizygotic or genetically non-identical twin pairs, there was only 1 of 38 (2.6%) pairs where both twins were trans.[8] The significant percent of identical twin pairs in which both twins are trans and the virtual absence of dizygotic twins (raised in the same family at the same time) in which both were trans would provide evidence that transgender identity is significantly influenced by genetics if both sets were raised in different families.
    • Brain structure
      • This section may be confusing or unclear to readers. Please help clarify the section. There might be a discussion about this on the talk page. (November 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)