Leftists...........explain this.

Just let me try to understand what you're saying...a clitoris (which everyone who has ever existed has possessed) isn't female genitalia? This has become absurd. I encourage you to take a step back and re-evaluate your position.

If chromosomes are absolute...how do you think intersex people exist? 

Still false.  By definition, leftists believe that every citizen has a right to an opinion on any subject.

 Your definition of left/right seems to be coming from Tik Tok and Tucker and not from studying the Tennis Court Oath.

Please educate yourself on the meaning of the terms you use before you use them.

Correct.  Leftists seek to minimize government intervention in the lives of citizens.

• No, you are using Tucker Carlson's definitions of words rather than the dictionary.  When you use non-biased expert sources, you discover that "Scholars distinguish libertarian views on the nature of property and capital, usually along left–right or socialist–capitalist lines.  Libertarians of various schools were influenced by liberal ideas.  Libertarianism originated as a form of left-wing politics such as anti-authoritarian and anti-state socialists like anarchists especially social anarchists, but more generally libertarian communists/Marxists and libertarian socialists" (Wikipedia)
  

• I've already demonstrated that your argument is formally broken. 
  

• Your conclusions are based on a primitive, Tucker-style poltical dichotomy with no relation to the tenants of political science.
  

• You don't seem to undersand the dictionary definition of Leftism.
  

• You can't provide one example of a left-leaning politician publicly stating that some citizens are not entitled to their  own opinion on any subject under any condition.  Suppressing opinion is a RIght-wing character flaw.
  

Wrong. Everyone has a right to their own opinion and always will, this is a basic human right.

Wrong. Words in different contexts carry different meanings. On the subject of abortion, when we use the term woman we are generally talking about people with uteruses.

I also don't watch fox news and rarely watch Tucker Carlson. 

I get my definition from what I see.

Unless it conflates with their own. Just look at the media

The cast of the Daily Wire gets content restricted and age restricted by YouTube where they are relaying their own opinions on political and personal topics, none of which are bad. 

Meanwhile on YouTube Kids there are videos on the recommended page, teaching kids about pronouns, and consent, and sexual topics. Yet those videos are on YouTube Kids. 

You can't provide one example of a left-leaning politician publicly stating that some citizens are not entitled to their  own opinion on any subject under any condition.  Suppressing opinion is a RIght-wing character flaw.

I never said anything about politicians saying this. Again, the explanation I wanted doesn't have to do with political leaders and bills etc. This has to do with an ideology. 

->

@<<<oromagi>>>

Potential conflating but it does happen. Many pro abortion individuals deny anothers ability to have an opinion on abortion in general.  Even if that person is a woman. 

• Let's have some specific , non-anonymous examples, please.

Whether it is a woman and whether one has a uterus or not is two separate issues no matter independent or not.

Ok dude. I have seen you, countless times state that men shouldn't be involved in this issue, because it isn't their problem.

..............what other people besides women have uteruses?

See guys, this is a prime example of delusion. 

• Yes, the internet is an anonymous unregulatable wild west and no place for children.  Most experts recommend no YouTube or reallyany social meda for children.   You are probably fucking yourself up right now just by reading this.  I could drop a pronoun at any moment.
  

Just let me try to understand what you're saying...a clitoris (which everyone who has ever existed has possessed) isn't female genitalia? This has become absurd. I encourage you to take a step back and re-evaluate your position.

Nope, you are misunderstanding what I am saying. 

If chromosomes are absolute...how do you think intersex people exist? 

Intersex people are born with different organs, not chromosomes. 

Serious debaters use dictionaries so that everybody is talking about the same thing. 

The Daily WIre has been caught printing a lot of fake news, especially regarding the election, the pandemic, climate change.

Scale is hardly relevant. If it's only one, but a right the laws are wrong. If it's a hundred thousand but abuse, the laws are right.

If chromosomes are absolute...how do you think intersex people exist? 

Why pretend this matters when the trans cult won't accept any biological standard whatsoever? It's a "social construct" [...] when it needs to be.

This is your opportunity to explain.

So, in your mind, an individual that looks female, has functional female genitalia, a uterus, fallopian tubes, and... XY chromosomes is male?  I'm sure people with Swyer syndrome would disagree with that assessment.

Scale is hardly relevant. If it's only one, but a right the laws are wrong. If it's a hundred thousand but abuse, the laws are right.

I agree. Any number of boys having their genitals mutilated (aka circumcized) without their consent is abhorrent. 

If chromosomes are absolute...how do you think intersex people exist? 

Why pretend this matters when the trans cult won't accept any biological standard whatsoever? It's a "social construct" [...] when it needs to be.

Sex is not a social construct and even it doesn't fit into nice neat binary categories. That's the point. 

K then. And all this time I thought having an opposing view point meant I could have one without having my life destroyed.

Sex is not a social construct and even it doesn't fit into nice neat binary categories. That's the point. 

It fits as well as anything non-abstract can. When we say humans are tetrapods we don't mean every human has four limbs or even was born with four limbs.

I agree. Any number of boys having their genitals mutilated (aka circumcized) without their consent is abhorrent. 

Somehow I doubt you believe that.

So, in your mind, an individual that looks female, has functional female genitalia, a uterus, fallopian tubes, and... XY chromosomes is male? [...]

Yep. [...]

Sex is not a social construct and even it doesn't fit into nice neat binary categories. That's the point. 

It fits as well as anything non-abstract can. When we say humans are tetrapods we don't mean every human has four limbs or even was born with four limbs.

True. We also don't have legislation specifically targeting folks with less than 4 limbs.

On the other hand, not fitting into the sex/gender binary is controversial (to say the least). 

We would certainly need legislation if a group of surgeons were performing amputations as "acts of mercy".

It's all about the notion that the 99% are obligated to change language, customs, education, and even dating habits to cater not to people with a natural deformity but to those who choose to deform themselves (or merely wish to).

If amputees insisted that they had different pronouns, were a new species, had a right to defecate on the street, asked children if they would be happier with fewer limbs

By that reasoning, a male (your label) can become pregnant. I think your label is not reasonable, but I thank you for the clarification. 

So, in your mind, an individual that looks female, has functional female genitalia, a uterus, fallopian tubes, and... XY chromosomes is male? [...]

We would certainly need legislation if a group of surgeons were performing amputations as "acts of mercy".

If experts in the appropriate fields determined less than 4 limbs makes person with BIID 'whole' (and that is what the patient wants), I would trust their judgement. That would ultimately be between the patient and their doctor. 

First off, gender dysphoria is natural. Education about it is appropriate. As for the rest, no one is obligated. Everything is optional except for the consequences. 

If amputees insisted that they had different pronouns, were a new species, had a right to defecate on the street, asked children if they would be happier with fewer limbs

What a spectacular strawman.

If experts in the appropriate fields determined less than 4 limbs makes person with BIID 'whole' (and that is what the patient wants), I would trust their judgement. That would ultimately be between the patient and their doctor. 

Well if this sentence doesn't prove a point about left-tribe authority based epistemology nothing will.

Everything is optional except for the consequences. 

rofl, ok well then the so called "obsession" with fake genitals, education, pronouns of the right-tribe are the "consequences".

What a mundane dodge. Analogies aren't strawmen.

This is not possible for a man to have reproductive properties but it is possible for them to be born with the genitalia of a woman. 

So, in your mind, an individual that looks female, has functional female genitalia, a uterus, fallopian tubes, and... XY chromosomes is male? [...]

It proves nothing other than I personally defer to expertise rather than allow my views to be informed by ignorance. No shame here. 

What a mundane dodge. Analogies aren't strawmen.

Non-analogous analogies are strawmen.

Defecating in the street?! Seriously.  Gtfo here with that BS.

• Yes, that's clear, and immediately raises the question about why aren't you getting your definitions from dictionaries?  Serious debaters use dictionaries so that everybody is talking about the same thing.  My definition of leftist comes from Wikipedia.  Your definition of leftist comes from Ben Shapiro.
  

• Look up the word CONFLATE on wiktionary.  It doesn't mean what you seem to think it means.  I think you are looking for some word more like "contradicts".  Likewise, Leftist doesn't mean what you seem to think it means.  Not all leftists are pro-abortion.  Not all abortion rights advocates are leftists.  Why not address the abortion rights advocates rather than swinging wide of target by addressing Leftists?
  

• I turned on age restrictions but I was still able to access everything on the Daily Wire.  I can't  confirm that such a restriction exists.  I believe you are under the age of restriction yourself and yet you seem to have access to the site as well.  Am I missing something?
  

The Daily WIre has been caught printing a lot of fake news, especially regarding the election, the pandemic, climate change.  I hope you are expanding your research to less motivated, more rigorously fact based sources, as well.

I have met a few women who have suggested that only women should vote on abortion.  I have never met any American who in serious debate would argue that a fellow American does not have a right to any opinion.  This is an obvious falsehood and a  misrepresentation of Leftism.

If you are saying that you can't find a single poltician who identifiies as Leftist and is recorded saying that only people with uteruses may have an opinion on abortion than you are conceding your point as lacking evicence.

If you're thinking well, there's people on the Internet who call themselves leftists and express some similar opinion than that's no kind of evidence at all.  That could be a Russian Agent or an 8 year old or  you, inventing evidence- whatever. 

 You need to find a bunch of real live Leftists who make the argument you claim they make.  If you can't do that then you had no basis to make the claim to begin with.