The title of your page is:
Why didn’t Trump get tanks sent to Ukraine?
You then talk about the Ukraine war and something involving Jan 6. I would recommend just staying on topic and not supporting multiple current things at once. Focus on one issue at a time unless you’re being bipartisan. You can hate Trump and not want to send tanks to Ukraine (or vice versa). I for example hate Trump; I think he is an authoritarian election denier who I would never want to have power. But I also don’t want the US spending $100 billion of the military budget on a foreign country. The US should be one giant buisiness; not starting wars, welcoming customers from all over the world to make us rich, and not giving them government benefits when they come here.
Here is my approach to the Ukraine war: Ukraine should ABSOLUTELY get protection from Russia. I agree. Now how do we get to that point? My solution is the following:
Ukraine’s GDP is about $200 billion. Russia’s military spending is about $100 billion. Meaning, if Ukraine spent half of its GDP on the military, it CAN defend its self against Russia.
You may think 50% of its GDP is too much, but America spent about 43% of our GDP towards the military when WWII was going on, and that war didn’t even affect us. Ukraine can easily pay 50% towards the military. America then sells them tanks instead of giving them to Ukraine for free.
That would be MY idea; not to give random countries $100 billion worth of supplies.
Thoughts on this idea?