DebateArt.com 2023 Election Voting

Author: whiteflame

Posts

Archived
Read-only
Total: 178
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,158
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
And this is why we need a vote adjudicator folks
JimBlaze
JimBlaze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 9
0
0
1
JimBlaze's avatar
JimBlaze
0
0
1
RationalMadman.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,158
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@whiteflame
Are you gonna be transparent or hide in your basement like Joe Biden? 
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
-->
@ILikePie5
We need to be able to work with him should we win
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
How was your 11 days rest? Was it like your however long it was ban and then further months hiatus after in the 2022 era?
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,820
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@ILikePie5
I do not publicly release information that is only available to moderation because of our administrative access. That's not going to change now.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,158
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@whiteflame
I do not publicly release information that is only available to moderation because of our administrative access. That's not going to change now.
So you’re not going to explain to the public why you’re restricting the vote of an individual? Who voted for one person and then created an account to vote for the other person while thinking “Wylted is a cuck.” That defies any sort of logic whatsoever lmao. And people wonder why there’s no trust in “moderation.” 
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,158
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
We need to be able to work with him should we win
He’s actively rigging the vote lol without providing any evidence. If the evidence says something, it would be fine, but he’s hiding it.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,158
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
You should be demanding information and transparency as well RM. A legal vote should be legal whether it’s for you or Wylted
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
Last time I was told anyone that signs up within 2 weeks of the election is not old enough an account to vote, or whatever the threshold was. That multi-accounter signed up the same day.
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,820
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@ILikePie5
They're two different people who made two different accounts with the same pfp to vote for opposite candidates. It's honestly not that hard to figure out and I don't know why you keep making this point. And, no, just because you want to get all the reasons why these now three accounts that were obviously made for the purpose of voting in this election doesn't mean I'm going to release privileged information about them.
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
-->
@RationalMadman
I will take another 30 day rest or so after I win, but yes very much renewing like a ban
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,158
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
Last time I was told anyone that signs up within 2 weeks of the election is not old enough an account to vote, or whatever the threshold was. That multi-accounter signed up the same day.
I don’t see that in the rules. Plus the first account signed up on the 16, which was yesterday 
JimBlaze
JimBlaze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 9
0
0
1
JimBlaze's avatar
JimBlaze
0
0
1
-->
@ILikePie5
Who voted for one person and then created an account to vote for the other person while thinking “Wylted is a cuck.”
Please excuse my brother Jimmy, he is a bit of a dick.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,158
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@whiteflame
They're two different people who made two different accounts with the same pfp to vote for opposite candidates. It's honestly not that hard to figure out and I don't know why you keep making this point. And, no, just because you want to get all the reasons why these now three accounts that were obviously made for the purpose of voting in this election doesn't mean I'm going to release privileged information about them.
What do you mean two different people? Are you admitting that the accounts were owned by different people? 

Anyone can impersonate an individual. I’m asking for evidence that explains why someone that thinks Wylted is cuck would vote for Wylted Lmaoo. They’re either 2 separate people or multi accounts.
AustinL0926
AustinL0926's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,185
3
5
9
AustinL0926's avatar
AustinL0926
3
5
9
-->
@JimBlaze
You used the wrong account lmao
JimBlaze
JimBlaze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 9
0
0
1
JimBlaze's avatar
JimBlaze
0
0
1
-->
@AustinL0926
How so?
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,820
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@ILikePie5
They are not multiaccounts of one another. They are distinct accounts created by different people, one of whom copied the pfp of the other. That's all the information you'll get from me.
AustinL0926
AustinL0926's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,185
3
5
9
AustinL0926's avatar
AustinL0926
3
5
9
-->
@JimBlaze
You referred to yourself in the third person.
JimBlaze
JimBlaze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 9
0
0
1
JimBlaze's avatar
JimBlaze
0
0
1
-->
@AustinL0926
Oh I see, understandable mistake on your part. Jimmy is a seperate account from Jim (see post 13).

What account did you think I was trying to post from?
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,158
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@whiteflame
They are not multiaccounts of one another. They are distinct accounts created by different people, one of whom copied the pfp of the other. That's all the information you'll get from me.
So why are their votes not counting again? Especially if they’re distinct people? What’s the evidence they only created the accounts to vote. How can you determine that before the election is even over?
AustinL0926
AustinL0926's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,185
3
5
9
AustinL0926's avatar
AustinL0926
3
5
9
-->
@JimBlaze
IDK, at first I thought you were an alt of JohnnyBlaze, but on second thought, I've decided you're probably not.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,158
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@whiteflame
As a moderator, you have a fiduciary duty to the voters who passed the MEEP to explain the evidence behind why votes are not counting
JimBlaze
JimBlaze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 9
0
0
1
JimBlaze's avatar
JimBlaze
0
0
1
-->
@AustinL0926
No, I am not Johnny. I am Jimmy though. It is pretty obvious that Johnny is either Pie or Wylted.
SkepticalOne
SkepticalOne's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 1,720
3
3
7
SkepticalOne's avatar
SkepticalOne
3
3
7
RationalMadman
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,158
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
@RM

If you win, I would hope there will be a full investigation into this matter that has prevented possibly legal votes from being counted.
JimBlaze
JimBlaze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 9
0
0
1
JimBlaze's avatar
JimBlaze
0
0
1
-->
@RationalMadman
If you win, I would hope there will be a full investigation into this matter of blatant voter fraud by the Blaze triplets.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,601
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@ILikePie5
Dont expect anything from RationalMadman. He says one thing, thinks another, does third.
David
David's avatar
Debates: 92
Posts: 1,218
4
7
10
David's avatar
David
4
7
10
Vote: Abstain 
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@ILikePie5
I will make you an offer you cannot refuse,

We agree to count Johnny's vote and then count Jimmy and Jim's. :)