They came up with a "new" definition of the word Woman.

It's simple really. If a dictionary has the ability to change the definition of words that we use everyday, then how can we function as a rational society. By that logic the constitution could play into whatever you want the law to be, just based on a couple of simple definition changes. That is how it takes away freedom and rights. And guess where it has happened? Cambridge Dictionary....just a couple of months ago.  

No, gender has everything to do with science. It is based in biology. It is not a social construct. It is how people identify, based on their biological sex. 

And your right, it isn't and shouldn't be complicated, but the left and the LGBTQ+ community has made it just that.

They came up with a "new" definition of the word Woman.

What a cr@p definition of woman

Woman: Anyone that is a cis woman or trans woman

You realize there are many women who can’t bare offspring or produce eggs. right? What do we call those people?

This came up in the Supreme Court case for gay marriage when conservatives tried to argue that the purpose of marriage was for procreation.

Can you think of any other words that had their definition change or evolve over time? Did it destroy society?

The definition of a woman is a biological adult human female. It's not that complicated. 

No, that’s what you base it on.

Biological sex is a matter of fact which we look to science to define. Gender is a human construct no matter how much you pretend it isn’t. Science has nothing to do with whether one prefers to be called a him or a her, whether one should wear Timberlands or a dress, or whether one should pursue a career as a seamstress or a construction worker. We invented all of that, and that is all part of the conversation with regards to gender.

What the political right does is just pretend that the way we’ve always thought of gender is the only way to think about it....

 and then by extension pretend that when other people talk about it, they’re using words in the same way you are. That’s just plain stupid.

If you want to have a conversation with someone else you have to begin by understanding what they mean when they use certain terms. That’s common sense. People who are experiencing and/or advocating for those going through gender dysphoria are talking about all of this is a very different way. If you’re going to criticize it the least you can do is make an effort to understand what others are talking about.

You were the one that defined a woman as someone who can produce an offspring. Now after telling Underdog not to use woman in the definition of a woman you are defining a woman as female. That’s brilliant 

Woman is the identity.

Female is the biological aspect. 

That is a circular definition. Don't use the word woman, to define the word woman. It's simple English really.

you just undermined your own argument with this statement genius. 

I can define the word, “Dakotas” with North and South Dakota.  That is using the word Dakota to define the term, “Dakotas”.

They came up with a "new" definition of the word Woman.

How would you define the Dakotas without using the term, “Dakota” then?  The only alternative definition I can think of are 2 states between various other states and provinces.  But if you define these states and provinces, you end up using the term Dakota in that definition.

The only alternative to the best of my knowledge is realizing that you don’t have to define every subsequent term to define the term you were originally trying to define.  

Two states in the USA, that was named by a member of an Indigenous people of the northern Mississippi River valley. 

No, it's what humans have based it on through all of human history up until now. 

To assume that gender is a human construct, is to assume that there are more than 2 genders, and that proposal cannot be argued thoroughly or good in any way. 

So, everyone through human history is part of the political right?

So, by that logic, everyone can use the same words to mean different things, and then society falls.

It would be like this:

One person thinks the word firetruck, means car crash, and the other person thinks it is a truck that puts out fires.

With logic like this, the world couldn't go round.

This logic is plain stupid.

As a functioning society, we have to have the same basic understanding of the English language, or else no one will understand what anyone else is saying.

Though I don't mean it as a stab at furries,

Who I assume treat it as a hobby, rather than identify as,

Like cosplayers.

Doesn’t Nebraska also fall under that definition as well?  I don’t know too much about Native American history.

Humans also thought slavery was ok for most of human history, until we realized it wasn’t. Our previous usage of gender is irrelevant to what makes sense now.

If it’s a human construct then there is no “correct” way for us to interpret it. It’s up to us to decide that, that’s what this conversation is about.

Political right and left are sides based on society’s issues. This hasn’t been an issue till now, so no.

No one is arguing that *everyone* can just use words however they want, we’re talking about how all of us should be thinking of these terms, or at the least in this particular conversation I’m explaining to you that while you can take issue with how someone else uses a word, you can’t pretend their argument is stupid because you’re translating everything into your own terms and not theirs.

And yet definitions have evolved all throughout the history of human civilization, yet we’re all still here, still thriving.