Why I Support LGBT & Feminism

You seem to be pretty convinced. Let's have a debate on that, maybe you can convince the others too. Still all this post is off-topic.

Your children have more sexual intercourse, sexual partners, pregnancies, & abortions than any in History. You groom them since early age into sexual identity, sexual education, pride, drag, & all the based sexual perversions. Idk where you're from, but in the US 23 million children below 17 have had sexual intercourse, & more than 40 thousand below the age of 10. & it keeping getting worse every year. I know you love to have your children f*ck & attend strip clubs & have abortion after another or children of their own out of wedlock, & participate in all kinds of sexual deviations, but GOD FORBID! they join in holy matrimony. As I keep saying, the only thing your societies promote is degeneracy, nothing else. It's OK if children have all the sex & partners & abortions in the world, as long as they do it out of wedlock. What a sick disgusting culture this is.

No such thing. Gang rape is punishable by settlement, cutting off two opposite limbs, & exile in Sharia. & if the perpetrator happens to be non-virgin then stoning on top of all that.

Muslim countries have the lowest rates of rape, while Western countries dominate the top rates

Say, Family values in Islam, I'll take Pro you take Con. Or, gang rape in Islam, I'll take Con & you take Pro. Maybe we can have a debate on who has the best Family values, I'll take Islam, you chose whatever you want.

You are talking to me here & you haven't seen my face. Just think of it as a protective mask... I love how Corona exposed all these types, wearing a head cover or a beanie with a mask is fine, but a hijab with niqab is an unacceptable. Also, you are a girl (I assume); you don't have to worry about seeing her face, that's only for strange men. 

Jimmy Saville- abused more than 400 child victims, of course, these findings came after his death... We don't need to talk about Jeffery Epstein & where that leads... 

But once the lower class people in the West suddenly gained wealth & joined the middle class in the early to mid-20th century -largely thanks to Colonialism & Industrialization, they brought their backward barbaric customs with them & imposed them on the rest of the society as the new trend. But I digress.

It's funny how users like you often jump to the suggestion "let's debate" when you are already really struggling to defend your stance.

You're desperate to show us all how wonderful Islam is, but you aren't convincing anyone. That is because we know how harmful and toxic the Islamic faith is. If you think otherwise, you are deluded. 

The rest of your commentary here is opinionated, absurd, banal, and barely readable because of how childish it is.

You've based an entire paragraph (and paragraphs) on pure misguided opinion and assumption

- well done to you! If saying "ooh but everyone in the West gets abortions and loves seeeex 2 much" is what I would see in a debate with you, then I'm really glad that I've refused your request.

In Islam, there is stigma attached to being raped and as a consequence, many women will not say they have been raped.

Another factor is that the police in their countries likely do not care. 

In the West, it's encouraged to claim rape if you think you have been raped. And, the police have been made to care. This would somewhat allude to the "feminism" that you purport to despise.

Apparently now though, it's convenient for you to like it.

In response to your comment on Muslims and China, I can only presume that you are unaware of current events there. 

Muslims, are not popular in China. 

Grooming gangs, gang rape, and beheadings weren’t a problem pre-mass-Muslim-immigration

And the vast majority of colonized countries are way better off than they were before colonization and better than they otherwise would be

But, I’ll level with you. I’d prefer moderate Islamic values on aggregate to the current degenerate culture being exported by most Western countries. I don’t find that optimal at all, but those values are better than feminist ones.

But rest assured, there is a right-wing resurgence in many European countries and to some degree in America. Anti-feminist and anti-LGBTQ candidates are bringing back family values without Islam

You support a way of thinking that "you" say will decimate the white race.

I extrapolate that to mean you want the white race gone. I will concede you didn't say you hate whites but do want them gone based on your description of what you support.

Islamic values are Islamic values. No moderate & immoderate values.

- You can't possibly believe this. You might have been able to get away with this fantastic pretentious narrative in the past. Not anymore. Colonialism is the Crusades on steroid

Colonialism is the Crusades on steroid.

The places Muslims conquered actually thrived with their conquerers.

We'll see what the newly appointed King Charles will do.

Population collapse has little to do with the LGBTQ community and more so to do with economics and technological availability.

We can see these same demographic falls in China, despite them, as you yourself say, not being feminist in the least. This is also true in Korea and Japan.

It has nothing to do with feminism and more so with industrialisation, cost of living and the availability of material options.

Islamic nations will catch up the west in poor birthrates too when they get richer as nations. 

The west has also never really had a population advantage over the rest of the world, only coming close to China or India's populations during the industrial revolution.

The west conquered most of the world through superior technology tactics and overall being less divided than other places,  

which constantly are infighting like china and India.

Not population.

 Wrong. Qatar is the richest nation on Earth & its native population still boasts +4 in fertility, one of the highest in the world. Even in the "richer" West, Muslims still have high birth rates (around 3 in countries like France & the UK).

 False. You seem to believe that if you say it magically becomes true. – The West's total population by the end of the 19th century was a third of global population, equivalent to China's & India's combined. & In terms of urban population -which is the effective population- they had more than two thirds. 

I have talked to many muslims. Most of the time they talk about beheadings, stoning, cutting off limbs...ect.

I heard them talk about what are proper stones to use: round ones or sharp ones.

They said that one day, US will follow muslims example and introduce stoning and cutting off limbs of homosexuals. Not just homosexuals, but anyone who has sex outside marriage.

That's not true.

Qatar has a below replacement rate birthrate of 1.8.

It is only going to get lower. Give them time, and they will catch up with the Europeans and North East Asians.

We must remember that Europe has been prospering for much longer than these richer Middle East counter parts.

Time will tell.

If you're going to make these statements, you're going to need evidence to support them.

You critique me for saying things with no evidence,

speaking them into reality, but are you not doing the same if I'm guilty of it?

France and Britain were 5%, respectively. Maybe they're equal if you're counting literally every nation in Europe? And if you are counting every nation in Europe, that is nonsense.

The French didn't add their army or men to the British army to take over India. It was Britain that took over India, with France as its main competitor.

It should also be noted that this is counting British and French possessions, so colonises and not just the ethnic French and British.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Ottoman_Empire#1831_Ottoman_census

We're seeing it. In 100 years, the Middle East will not be any different from Europe. In 200 years, Africa won't be either.

Time will prove me right as Qatar and its neighbours have lower and lower birthrates.

There are, of course, a million factors that go into a country's birthrates, from access to contraceptives and values, although the biggest factor is definitely wealth and education,

not so much Islam.

Women being in the workplace also affects birthrates, but not having women in the workplace is even worse and could strip many western nations of hundreds of billions, if not into the trillions, of their GDP if women were to be taken out. making everyone collectively poorer. It's also very hard to raise a child on one person's income unless they have an affluent job. Which isnt many people, most people needed their mothers to be working growing up to have a decent life themselves.

No drugs here. Just the beauty of islam.

I can still send you a picture of my penis in case you want to see what muslims did to me. It doesnt have to be gay. Or are you saying it will tempt you so you dont want to see it? Its okay. I understand.

And who are my people other than earthlings.

And who are my ilk other than earthlings.

Colonists brought high speed rail, electricity, plumbing, concrete roads, many things that would otherwise not exist

During colonial rule, Rhodesia (Zimbabwe) was the breadbasket of Africa. Once the “colonists” were forced out, they had food insecurity.

Some majority-Muslim countries still enslave people

Yet you support the thinking that is causing what you say you don't want.

Maybe you should've thought about that for a minute before you jumped the gun... I mentioned *native* Qataris, who constitute a tenth of the total population of Qatar, who also happen to be obscenely rich. The rest are immigrants who came to work in the country leaving their families back home. Of course Qatar is gunna have low birth rates stats, since the children of most residents in the country are born & live somewhere else.

You do have a tendency to skip a thought or two... How very convenient of you to ignore the fact that European Muslims still do have high birth rates: around 3 in countries like France & the UK for instance, about double that of the natives. 

I wouldn't be so sure about that... the average income of Europe post WWII is less than the average income of Africa today. So, maybe by a couple of decades.

Time has told. Muslims always have higher birth rates, wherever they are. Evidently due to strong Family values. For instance, the countries with least female participation in workforce are all Muslim countries. Muslim women would rather leave their jobs & take care of their families. 

- Evidence for what?! That abandoning Family in favor of Labour does not lead to lower birth rates?

China in the 1800's represented 30% of the world's population, and India, 21%.

- English, learn it. I said "by the end of the 19th century". There wasn't much global Colonialism in the 1800s was there! Regardless, in the 1900s, Western population (Europe, America & settlements) accounted for some 38% of global population, & the combined population of China & India accounted for some 41%.

You're proving my case. The major European -later Colonial- states then (according to your own source) constituted a quarter of global population, also making up almost the entirety of Europe's population.

- Your ignorance keeps showing. There was no India in the 1800s. The Indian Subcontinent then had more states & kingdoms than Europe. 

Here again you are proving my point. The Ottomans had less people than individual European countries like France, UK, Germany... (their predecessors) each. European population increased from 80 million in mid 17th century to some 500 million by the end of the 19th century. 

Yet, we consistently across the board see Muslims having higher birth rates than their counterparts everywhere in the world, no matter the income level, education, contraception access & everything in between. In Africa, Muslim nations always have higher birthrates than their Christian neighbors. Even within single nations, Muslims always have the highest birthrates. In India, more than Hindus. In Nigeria, more than Christians. In Palestine, more than Jews...etc.