Copying someone else’s material is the same as stealing intellectual property and any form of stealing is a issue of morality.
To claim something is subjective is to claim that there is no right or wrong answer.
So no, that’s not literally what that means.
--> @ShilaCopying someone else’s material is the same as stealing intellectual property and any form of stealing is a issue of morality.The “subject” was mostly in reference to the timeline rather than the generally agreed principle that it’s wrong to steal.
Wrong, please don’t speak for me.
--> @TarikWrong, please don’t speak for me.SkepticalOne: There is quite a difference between speaking for you and pointing out flaws in your reasoning. I was doing the latter. Do you plan to provide any defense?
--> @TarikWrong, please don’t speak for me.SkepticalOne: There is quite a difference between speaking for you and pointing out flaws in your reasoning. I was doing the latter. Do you plan to provide any defense?So you were thinking for Tarik which is worse than speaking for him.
Because the material is considered intellectual property an expiry date is set.
There is quite a difference between speaking for you and pointing out flaws in your reasoning. I was doing the latter.
--> @Shila--> @TarikWrong, please don’t speak for me.SkepticalOne: There is quite a difference between speaking for you and pointing out flaws in your reasoning. I was doing the latter. Do you plan to provide any defense?So you were thinking for Tarik which is worse than speaking for him.You are absolutely terrible at understanding what you are reading, aren't you?
--> @Shila--> @TarikWrong, please don’t speak for me.SkepticalOne: There is quite a difference between speaking for you and pointing out flaws in your reasoning. I was doing the latter. Do you plan to provide any defense?So you were thinking for Tarik which is worse than speaking for him.You are absolutely terrible at understanding what you are reading, aren't you?Odd that you would attack me when the person who can help you is SkepticalOne.
Don’t know what “reasoning” your referring to but it has nothing to do with me, hence why I asked you not to claim on my behalf.
Is original sin not a doctrine you subscribe to? If so, how do you figure your deity doesn't punish imperfection?
Imperfect is not synonymous to sin.
Imperfect is not synonymous to sin
A typically trite semantics-based riposte that misses the point completely.Perhaps deliberately so.
--> @SkepticalOneIs original sin not a doctrine you subscribe to? If so, how do you figure your deity doesn't punish imperfection?Imperfect is not synonymous to sin https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/7916/post-links/345509
In the context of this conversation, imperfection and sin are synonymous. One only need consult the thread to validate this. Once again, your dishonesty is plain for all to see.
--> @SkepticalOneIn the context of this conversation, imperfection and sin are synonymous. One only need consult the thread to validate this. Once again, your dishonesty is plain for all to see.1st of all I NEVER conflated imperfection with sin. 2nd you haven’t validated anything. 3rd the only dishonest one is you for not providing any support for any of your claims.
1st of all I NEVER conflated imperfection with sin. 2nd you haven’t validated anything. 3rd the only dishonest one is you for not providing any support for any of your claims.
--> @Tarik1st of all I NEVER conflated imperfection with sin. 2nd you haven’t validated anything. 3rd the only dishonest one is you for not providing any support for any of your claims.1. You don't need to - it's explicitly spelled out in your holy book. 2/3. I apparently gave you too much credit when assuming you had passing knowledge of the Bible while pointing out the conflict between your explicit views and core Christian doctrines. Link Original sin is thought to be a built-in corruption of mankind - an imperfection which makes humanity worthy of punishment by default. So, yes, according to your religion and holy book, God does punish for imperfection.
Why are you using an argument you are most Skeptical about?
--> @ShilaWhy are you using an argument you are most Skeptical about?I am trying to make sense of my interlocutor's views. Assuming his views for the sake of argument allows he and I some (temporary) common ground.
--> @ShilaPugilists stand in the same boxing ring because fighting from different venues is pointless
1. You don't need to - it's explicitly spelled out in your holy book.
So, yes, according to your religion and holy book, God does punish for imperfection.
-> @SkepticalOne1. You don't need to - it's explicitly spelled out in your holy book.Unless you have scripture quoting that your argument is null and void.So, yes, according to your religion and holy book, God does punish for imperfection.Again don’t speak for me, and if God punishes for imperfection how do you explain the concept of heaven “mr skeptical”?
@Tarik I apparently gave you too much credit when assuming you had passing knowledge of the Bible
Again don’t speak for me, and if God punishes for imperfection then how do you explain the concept of heaven “mr skeptical” because paradise doesn’t sound like much of a punishment to me.
Okay, but that doesn’t apply to morality and even if I agreed this argument is apropos with nihilism not whatever position you’ve been taking.
I don’t think YOU even know what you mean.
