-->
@Greyparrot
Wasn’t Trump’s buddy Mike Lindell addicted to crack?
And Trump’s older brother - he died of alcoholism.
Are they idiots too?
It's always amusing when an idiot calls another person they do not know, personally or otherwise, an idiot. Hypocrisy 101.
But how would you call me an idiot then? You don’t know me “personally or otherwise”. Hypocrisy 201.
After carefully sifting through many possible interpretations the only one that makes any sense is that Biden was protecting Hunter in his demand
Trump could have done it to Hillary and Joe Biden but he didn't.
500 new business starts and only 6 failed, all the rest sold at a profit. Prove all the rest of your accusations.
After carefully sifting through many possible interpretations the only one that makes any sense is that Biden was protecting Hunter in his demandYou think this makes sense because you have ignored or just hand waive away every fact which does not align.
The Vice President does not have the authority to make this decision on his own, so it wasn’t even coming from him.
Everyone within the federal government including the intelligence agencies and congress, and even the European Union all agreed with this move. Again, this wasn’t Joe Biden, it was official US policy.
The investigation into Burisma was dormant at the time Biden did this, and the events that were under investigation occurred on 2010, years before Hunter joined the board so he had no personal exposure regardless.
Meanwhile the Trump/Ukraine couldn’t be any more obvious but you cherry pick your facts there as well to make it seem plausible that he was just out to stop corruption. Why?
Executing a search warrant requires the DOJ to show probable cause that the subject not only committed a crime but that evidence of said crime is in the location requesting to be searched, and have all this signed off by a federal judge.
IwantRooseveltagain...-->@TWS1405I blocked you because you’re an idiot.
that there was no evidence Trump colluded with Russia.
That does not follow.1.) He could be bluffing, for all the Ukrainian government knew he could stop the funds alone.2.) It could be coming from him, with Obama going along as a favor.
Provide evidence, from before the quid pro quo.
That is not what Viktor Shokin said
nor does that claim line up with the fact that Mykola Zlochevsky's assets were seized around 4/2/2016.
There is no other plausible motive. Why would Trump want Hunter and burisma investigated if he didn't think there was corruption?
That does not follow.1.) He could be bluffing, for all the Ukrainian government knew he could stop the funds alone.The Ukrainian government knows how the US government works, it’s not a secret.
2.) It could be coming from him, with Obama going along as a favor.Obama wouldn’t go along with stopping foreign aid to an ally unless there is an actual reason. This isn’t something you do and no one notices, just ask Trump.
Provide evidence, from before the quid pro quo.
That is not what Viktor Shokin saidIt’s what Vitaly Kasko says.
nor does that claim line up with the fact that Mykola Zlochevsky's assets were seized around 4/2/2016.His personal assets were seized, there’s no indication that had anything to do with Burisma. If it did they would have seized company assets.
There is no other plausible motive. Why would Trump want Hunter and burisma investigated if he didn't think there was corruption?He didn’t care whether they were investigated, according to Gordon Sondland anyway, all he cared about was that the investigation was announced.
He wanted the investigation announced so that he could use it to slander his political opponent. That’s clearly what this was all about.
Let me ask you a question, if you believe Trump was legitimately trying to stop corruption in Ukraine and that Trump believed he was right… why did Trump all of a sudden resume the payments to Ukraine after this story broke?
Ya, Trump is an idiot, what have you done besides call people you don't know idiots?
The bureaucracy is not transparent.
You trust Obama to not do something shady? then I trust Guilani. Stalemate.
Double failure:1.) Doesn't mention Shokin.
2.) 2 months 6 days after quid pro quo
You mean this Kasko:
A comment befitting a naive child.
He didn’t care whether they were investigated, according to Gordon Sondland anyway, all he cared about was that the investigation was announced.According to the recording he did care if they were investigated. Deep State Sycophant vs hard evidence? I'm going with hard evidence.
He was no more a political opponent than Sanders, Warren, Buttigieg, Yang, Gabert, etc..
There are multiple independently plausible explanations that don't involve Trump asking for a frame job
And not for nothing but I notice you continue to keep blaming everything on this imaginary deep state bogeyman MAGA world concocted. Do you have any evidence of who is in this deep state and what they have done, you know, actual evidence, or do you find it logically valid to just slide them in wherever it is convenient?