The Second Amendment - obsolete and in need of reform

Author: IwantRooseveltagain

Posts

Total: 229
Topic's author
#151
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@TWS1405
Wow, impressive intellectual coward retort there twit. 

Yes, Army. Military Police Corp. Airborne. 
Military Police Investigator under the Criminal Investigation Division. You know, like NCIS, but just the Army's version of it. Makes me far more intelligent than you, peon. 
Oh good, you went back and added your resume. Well I’m sure the army had many brilliant criminal investigators like yourself in the ranks. 

#152
TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Yes, Army. Military Police Corp. Airborne. 
Military Police Investigator under the Criminal Investigation Division. You know, like NCIS, but just the Army's version of it. Makes me far more intelligent than you, peon. 
Oh good, you went back and added your resume. Well I’m sure the army had many brilliant criminal investigators like yourself in the ranks. 
Intellectual coward - Dunning Kruger Effect - sophomoric banal retort. 

You lose  
#153
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@TWS1405
Intellectual coward - Dunning Kruger Effect - sophomoric banal retort. 

You lose  
when all else fails

resort to ad hominem attack

and rush to declare victory
#154
TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
-->
@3RU7AL
Intellectual coward - Dunning Kruger Effect - sophomoric banal retort. 

You lose  
when all else fails

resort to ad hominem attack

and rush to declare victory
Truth is truth no matter how you try to slice it.

Prove him right, and me wrong if you disagree.

Otherwise, fuck off. 

I have ZERO patience for the ignorant. 
#155
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@TWS1405
Truth is truth no matter how you try to slice it.

Prove him right, and me wrong if you disagree.

Otherwise, fuck off. 
naked assertions

and now with commands
#156
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@TWS1405
Truth is truth no matter how you try to slice it.

Prove him right, and me wrong if you disagree.

Otherwise, fuck off. 

I have ZERO patience for the ignorant. 
and with edits

and another ad hominem
#157
TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
-->
@3RU7AL
Intellectual coward. 

#158
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@TWS1405
Intellectual coward. 
when all else fails, ad hominem attack ad nauseum
#159
TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
-->
@3RU7AL
Intellectual coward is NOT an ad hominem. 



#160
TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
-->
@3RU7AL
Truth is truth no matter how you try to slice it.

Prove him right, and me wrong if you disagree.

Otherwise, fuck off. 
naked assertions

and now with commands

It's called burden of proof for a reason. Alien. 
#161
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@TWS1405
Intellectual coward is NOT an ad hominem. 
any comment on the speaker is an ad hominem

and a red herring
#162
TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
-->
@3RU7AL
Ad hominem
Ad hominem, short for argumentum ad hominem, refers to several types of arguments, some but not all of which are fallacious. Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than addressing the substance of the argument itself. The most common form of ad hominem is "A makes a claim x, B asserts that A holds a property that is unwelcome, and hence B concludes that argument x is wrong". Fallacious ad hominem reasoning occurs where the validity of an argument is not based on deduction or syllogism, but on an attribute of the person putting it forward. Valid ad hominem arguments occur in informal logic, where the person making the argument relies on arguments from authority such as testimony, expertise, or a selective presentation of information supporting the position they are advocating.Wikipedia

Red herring
A red herring is something that misleads or distracts from a relevant or important question. It may be either a logical fallacy or a literary device that leads readers or audiences toward a false conclusion. A red herring may be used intentionally, as in mystery fiction or as part of rhetorical strategies, or may be used in argumentation inadvertently. The term was popularized in 1807 by English polemicist William Cobbett, who told a story of having used a strong-smelling smoked fish to divert and distract hounds from chasing a rabbit.Wikipedia

#163
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@TWS1405
bingo
#164
TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
-->
@3RU7AL
Bingo?

Clearly your comprehension of understanding each term and their usage is subpar. 
#165
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@TWS1405
Clearly your comprehension of understanding each term and their usage is subpar. 
another ad hominem attack
Topic's author
#166
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@TWS1405
Intellectual coward - Intellectual coward - Dunning Kruger Effect - sophomoric banal retort. You lose Kruger Effect - sophomoric banal retort. You lose
lol. I can just imagine you hanging out at the E-Club using words like that.


#167
TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
-->
@3RU7AL
Clearly your comprehension of understanding each term and their usage is subpar. 
another ad hominem attack
Nope. An observation of fact. 
#168
TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Intellectual coward - Intellectual coward - Dunning Kruger Effect - sophomoric banal retort. You lose Kruger Effect - sophomoric banal retort. You lose
lol. I can just imagine you hanging out at the E-Club using words like that.
#hypocrite 
#169
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@TWS1405
Nope. An observation of fact. 
you are conflating fact and opinion
#170
TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
-->
@3RU7AL
Nope. An observation of fact. 
you are conflating fact and opinion

An amoeba can claim that. Are you an amoeba???

Topic's author
#171
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@3RU7AL
when all else fails resort to ad hominem attack and rush to declare victory
Do you believe this TWS105 guy? He was a Corporal in the Army and then a bounty hunter and he thinks he’s Frasier Crane.
I’m guessing he “retired” at 45 either on disability or nobody would hire him.
He has a blog that shows how he suffers from White Fragility and status anxiety.

#172
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,114
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Greyparrot
@TWS1405
People like Roosevelt cannot be dealt with logic and facts. They purposefully misrepresent the views of the Founders or manipulate their opinions in a way to benefit themselves.

I’d trust Supreme Court Justices to read the hundreds of briefs with evidence since the inception of the United States than some Captain in the military who has zero background in law and constitutional interpretation.

His responses to me are a case study of the left wing ideology. Run your argument on emotions. Thank god for the Founding Fathers and Supreme Court Justices who fought to protect the rights we have.
Topic's author
#173
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@ILikePie5
You guys are gonna be known as the 3 Trump morons on this site.
#174
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,905
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Man all you TDS freaks are gonna be sooo pissed when you find out who your president is in 2024 and it aint Trump.
#175
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
when all else fails resort to ad hominem attack and rush to declare victory
Do you believe this TWS105 guy? He was a Corporal in the Army and then a bounty hunter and he thinks he’s Frasier Crane.
I’m guessing he “retired” at 45 either on disability or nobody would hire him.
He has a blog that shows how he suffers from White Fragility and status anxiety.
commenting on the speaker themselves (with the aim to discredit and or disqualify) instead of addressing their arguments

is the very definition of an ad hominem attack
#176
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
Noticed that the two people arguing for gun control are ex-military with guns, who if ordered by the government to kill citizens they would obviously do so and want to be able to do it without citizens firing back.
#177
Deb-8-a-bull
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,204
3
2
3
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Deb-8-a-bull
3
2
3
I like how one is "ALLOWED"  to lose their gun / guns. 
Or
People are "ALLOWED"  to have their gun / guns stolen from them. .  
This fact surly comes in handy. 

Soooooooooo
The stats for gun thefts.would be interesting.  
#178
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,905
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
Those veterans forgot that they made an oath to protect the constitution, not to defy it.
#179
Athias
Athias's avatar
Debates: 20
Posts: 3,192
3
3
9
Athias's avatar
Athias
3
3
9
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
Noticed that the two people arguing for gun control are ex-military with guns, who if ordered by the government to kill citizens they would obviously do so and want to be able to do it without citizens firing back.
Nice.
#180
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,905
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Athias
Nice.
I'm a veteran, and I don't support tyranny.