Who’s worse: Trump or Desantis?

There is a clear difference. Who is objectively attempting to make the country more radical?

I think the Democratic party is much more corrupt as well. We saw this with the Russian collusion conspiracy theory spread by them just 5 years ago when Trump took office.

Well, I would say the Democrats are worse

Then you don’t live in reality. Of the two parties only one actually cares about democracy while the other is overtly hostile to it. No one with an IQ above room temperature would confuse which party is which.

The facts indisputably show that Russia interfered with the 2016 election

The facts indisputably show that Russia interfered with the 2016 election, the Trump campaign welcomed that help, and to some extent they organized their campaign around the help Russia was providing.

There is nothing corrupt or dishonest about acknowledging this and reasonably speculating as to how far it went.

Of the two parties only one actually cares about democracy while the other is overtly hostile to it. No one with an IQ above room temperature would confuse which party is which.

How is paying millions of dollars to destroy the opposition by getting radicals on the opposition voting ticket "caring about democracy?

Even CNN says this is evil.

The gist of your post to summarize, and I’ll use an analogy here, is that Trump carried the Republican Party about 70% of the way before being stifled by his own incompetence, so now a capable fascistic leader just needs to carry the party the other 30%, give or take. The problem I see is that much of that 70% collapses without Trump.

The Democratic Party establishment is the problem.

I think the left is so fucked up with the crazy fringe people

Can you one thing the Republican Party is doing to radically transform this country aside from the call to erode privacy rights?

I'm curious: what exactly do you consider crazy fringe ideas? 

Trumps achievement was the extreme radicalization of the Republican base. To such an extreme that they will support almost anything.

I agree. Liberals (the media, late night television, fellow Democrat politicians and the majority of Democrat voters) are admonishing Biden

The facts indisputably show that Russia interfered with the 2016 election, the Trump campaign welcomed that help, and to some extent they organized their campaign around the help Russia was providing.

There is nothing corrupt or dishonest about acknowledging this and reasonably speculating as to how far it went.

That’s not what Saint Mueller said.

The special counsel found that Russia did interfere with the election, but “did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”

So you calling Bob Mueller a liar?

Nope cause they don't do anything even when they get Congressional power. Patriot act was very bad but that was long ago.

If you can't get a coalition to reduce government power, electing retarded Republicans that won't expand government power as much is the next best worst option.

As you know he didn't reduce government in any way, shape or form and grew it instead. 

If you can't get a coalition to reduce government power, electing retarded Republicans that won't expand government power as much is the next best worst option.

No, because nothing Mueller said contradicts anything I said.

First all, “did not find” evidence does not = “we found evidence of innocence”.

Second, Trump never spoke to Mueller because he refused. Apparently when you’re the president the law doesn’t apply to you.

Third, when Trump practiced his testimony with his own attorneys they told him if he testified he’d end up in an Orange jumpsuit. Again; his attorneys.

Regarding what we both said, both statements affirm that Russia interfere in our election.

Welcoming help from a foreign adversary is not conspiracy.

Organizing your campaign around what you anticipate a foreign adversary is going to do is not conspiracy.

So once again, you’ve taken the intentionally high standard of beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law and are applying it to a conversation based in the court of public opinion. When you have no defense against the facts, this is what you have to stoop to.

They are not going to magically become reasonable if trump disappears; and given that they are large enough that to become elected, not being an extreme radical is often detrimental to the election prospects of politicians on the right wing.