-->
@FLRW
man you're pretty angry. LOL
Supreme Court has overturned Roe V Wade
Posts
Total:
168
-->
@ILikePie5
The answer is no. The Proud Boys do not support Democrats.
I hope they all get some type of painful cancer and die slowly. The right to privacy has been destroyed it's going to bleed over into so much f****** s***. Since Libertarians have no pull I'll be voting Democrat from here on out.
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
I'll be voting Democrat from here on out.
Democrats had 50 years to introduce an amendment. You'll be waiting another 50 years if you give them your continued loyalty.
-->
@Greyparrot
They've never had my loyalty I've never voted Democrat in my life I've never voted Republican in my life since the day I could vote I voted Libertarian. At least in national elections I don't vote party in local elections I vote person. From here on out I will never ever vote for a Republican candidate on the national level ever and I will now be voting Democrat instead of Libertarian. Democrats didn't need to do anything because it was policy and there was no reason to change it Roe v Wade is not about abortion it's about privacy and this is going to bleed over into other things and it's going to f*** a lot of people.
Roe v Wade allows abortion without restriction, if a federal pro-choice law comes back I hope it restricts by time and circumstance or human beings will be killed without true justification.
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
I've never voted Republican in my life since the day I could vote I voted Libertarian.
Mad respect for that.
I heard that Republicans want to ban miscarriages.
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
is not about abortion it's about privacy
Lol, if it was so important, they would make an amendment like they did to free the slaves instead of waiting for a President to die. They had 50 years to do it.
-->
@Greyparrot
Again I don't know why they need to do it when it was already policy. Just like they barely move on gun control because there's gun control policies. Of course Roe v Wade gets overturned right around the time they do a big gun control legislation so more than likely all of them are working together to bend us over and stick it in our ass. They're all corrupt.
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
And just a hint, almost every constitutional amendment ever passed in American history requires bipartisan support, so excluding any party means you won't get anything. Guaranteed.
-->
@thett3
Why exactly does it matter if it is not mentioned in the rights that... what? Seven seriously privileged men at the time put together based on their morality at the time; hardly the pinnacle of idol to follow or adhere to the whims of.
I can understand the pro-life perspective, I cannot understand blind constitutionalism to the point it's like a religion.
-->
@RationalMadman
Why exactly does it matter if it is not mentioned in the rights that what? Seven seriously privileged men at the time put together based on their morality at the time; hardly the pinnacle of idol to follow or adhere to the whims of.I can understand the pro-life perspective, I cannot understand blind constitutionalism to the point it's like a religion.
Roe v Wade and the mentality behind it—that justices can just “put together” a new right based on their morality is an assault upon the very foundation of American government. There’s a constitutionally approved method of protecting the right to abortion in all fifty states, and that’s passing legislation. There’s a way to make abortion a constitutionally protected right and that’s by passing an amendment. If that sounds hard, too bad. Win more elections. The public is much more in favor of wanting abortion legal for any reason in the first trimester than it is a total ban, so make the case. Just making up that there’s a constitutional right to abortion when clearly no such right exists is asinine.
The constitution is important not only because it’s the contract that every official swears before God that they’ll uphold and defend but because it’s the rule we all have to play by. Those justices that decided Roe v Wade broke the rules. You have too many decisions like that and the entire system can’t survive.
-->
@RationalMadman
I can understand the pro-life perspective, I cannot understand blind constitutionalism to the point it's like a religion.
Roe and Casey relied upon the fact that abortion is enshrined in the Constitution, which is absurd. The Court did the right thing by respecting the 9th and 10th amendments and returning the issue to the people and their representatives
-->
@thett3
@ILikePie5
I am aware of the techinalities involved. That is also what I tried to discuss with someone I know irl but they don't understand that even people pro-abortion would want to replace Roe v Wade with something harder to remove or attack.
The problem is that the division is so 'this vs that' that progressives who are against abortion and pro solving the societal issues that drive the poor to avoid contraception and need to abort and even the fact that sex is often the only good thing in their life that isn't drug related, needs to stop.
There are left-wing reasons to be against abortion as a solution to unwanted babies but the whole issue is that america is so far right wing it will never fix these issues for the next 2 decades at least.
The right to privacy, to me, is address in the 4th amendment. You are free from illegal searches and seizures. And I believe that's because you have a right to privacy, even from the police.
I am extremely happy about this given that abortion should be illegal from the moment of conception
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
You are free from illegal searches and seizures.
Apparently, a fetus now has a right from an illegal seizure in some states now.
-->
@Greyparrot
The unborn don't have rights they're not even citizens are considered alive by law. I can't wait for the first attorney to try to get child support for a four week old in the womb.
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
Sadly, a state can grant anything rights. Including dogs.
There's more than one way to skin a cat.
Especially if there is big demand and a buck to be made.
-->
@zedvictor4
There's more than one way to skin a cat.
It's illegal to skin cats and fetuses in many states now.
"This is not the end, or even the beginning of the end; rather, it's the end of the beginning."
-->
@Greyparrot
Sure.
But it won't be in all States.
Is it illegal to shoot cats?
Is it eternal damnation for pro-lifers that shoot cat's?
-->
@zedvictor4
What state can I skin a live cat in?
-->
@Greyparrot
Any.
As long as you do it in private.
Make a law,
Break the law,
But don't tell any one.
That will be $500 please.
Thank you.
Well, at least this new ruling will create a lot of jobs for illegal aliens.
The Cato Institute has reported some implausible numbers, such as that over 42000 physicians in the United States are illegal aliens.
-->
@Greyparrot
If you think abusing animals is appropriate you are SOB.
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
Why can't I treat a fetus the same as a cat?
-->
@zedvictor4
Is it eternal damnation for pro-lifers that shoot cat's?
My cat, my choice.