Supreme Court has overturned Roe V Wade

Author: Dr.Franklin

Posts

Total: 168
#151
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@3RU7AL
Exactly. The government should invest in this instead of babble all day regarding why abortion should be illegal. Other than to protect the benefits of *some* people, I see no reason to not research into this.

At this stage, the fetus should have its genes unaltered.
#152
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Intelligence_06
why bother "the government" with ECTOGENESIS

if these conservative "pro-lifers" put half of their energy and fund-raising behind serious ECTOGENESIS, "the solution" could be ready in less than two years

you really want to save the unborn ?

open a clinic where you can take out the fetus and keep it alive

do that

and NOBODY will ever murder another baby, EVAR
#153
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@3RU7AL
you really want to save the unborn ?

open a clinic where you can take out the fetus and keep it alive
This is very possible by the current progression of technology, it can be developed NOW, it will just not be very profitable enough that people all around the US develop it.

I am a student. I have much to learn before I can do that and I hope I don't have to be the one inventing it because when I am old enough, it is too late.

What are those pro-lifers striving for again?

and NOBODY will ever murder another baby, EVAR
Women do not like the fact that their fetus which may begome a grown person will just die, but there are psychopathic asshole who will just do that. I believe they are the ones to be punished if any, and not all of them. Abortion, in my opinion, as of now, should be "innocent until guilty". If the womb-carrier is just doing it for fun without any need for abortion, that is where we probably need punishment if any.
#154
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Intelligence_06
What are those pro-lifers striving for again?
they claim they don't want any children to suffer

but i have to wonder why there are so many disabled children who never get adopted
#155
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@3RU7AL
I guess the position is being blamed for people using this position for incorrect reasons. These days, finding abortion reprehensive could get one cancelled. The position is technically less wrong theoretically and more practically because of how these people use it.
#156
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
A fetus is involuntarily incarcerated without due process.
it is also a squatter, living rent-free

it is also an uninvited guest who refuses to leave

it is also an illegal immigrant, due to be deported
#157
Novice_II
Novice_II's avatar
Debates: 98
Posts: 174
2
6
6
Novice_II's avatar
Novice_II
2
6
6
This is among the greatest decisions in American history. 
#158
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
so will a cow

cows have more rights than a human fetus.
#159
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
Twenty-two states limit abortion after a baby becomes viable outside of the womb [**]

I don't believe 22 states ban cattle slaughter.
#160
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
Twenty-two states limit abortion after a baby becomes viable outside of the womb

So a fetus has a 1 in 3 chance of being treated with dignity. Good odds.
#161
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
44 states prohibit some abortions after a certain point in pregnancy. [**]
#162
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
Can you slaughter your own animals in us?

A slaughter licence is not needed when slaughtering your own animal for your own consumption or consumption by your immediate family who live with you. However, certain operations both in slaughterhouses and when carried out on farms for the purpose of killing animals require a certificate of competence (CoC). [**]
#163
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
-->
@Greyparrot
cows have more rights than a human fetus.
As well they should.
#164
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10

#165
Theweakeredge
Theweakeredge's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 3,457
4
7
10
Theweakeredge's avatar
Theweakeredge
4
7
10
-->
@3RU7AL
Yes, I wasn't disagreeing? Why is this here?
#166
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Theweakeredge
Yes, I wasn't disagreeing? Why is this here?
please be slightly more specific
#167
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Greyparrot
@3RU7AL
A fetus is involuntarily incarcerated without due process.
it is also a squatter, living rent-free

it is also an uninvited guest who refuses to leave

it is also an illegal immigrant, due to be deported
This is precisely why it is morally abhorrent for the left wing to be less pro life than the right wing.

I get it, plan B pill, week 1 abortions but wtf is someone doing months in deciding to slaughter an unborn infant?

It is just insane to me unless her life is at risk or rape keeps traumatising her and it is within the first 3.5 months (really 2 months should be sufficient).
#168
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
It is just insane to me unless her life is at risk or rape keeps traumatising her and it is within the first 3.5 months (really 2 months should be sufficient).
roe v wade is not about "morality"

roe v wade is about medical privacy and the limits of government interference