Seriously, you guys need to closely examine Wylted from DP2:
"Guys Buddas analysis actually has merit, plus GP isn't being consistent with his behavior and meta."
(Which is antithetical to my analysis on GP.)
"Guys just look at Buddas analysis the last 4 pages DP1"
Argent: But he clearly states GP is annoyingly town
"No, you have to look at his earlier analysis"
(Wut)
______________
Yes, because you were sooooo closely analyzing my posts, that you completely missed where I town confirmed Roberts and sus'd him instead. Yup, cause that def shows you were paying attention to my analysis. Especially since you drew a meta and read conclusion antithetical to the majority of my analysis.
______________
This DP: "my read on GP was cause of what i said to Argent, not your analysis."
(Lol, yep that's why you kept mentioning my analysis).
________________
Also this DP:
"Me pushing GP doesnt jive with self-preservation."
Not entirely, but with a moment to ponder, its clear you kept pointing out my analysis, anyone can look back and see that. Theres the out he's been providing himself consistently should he get FoS'd.
"I guess Buddas analysis was incorrect, albeit had merit. Blame Budda, not me" would be the obvious set up for that insistence on people looking at my analysis, despite it apparently having little to do with ur read. (Sureeeeeee)
So yeah, self-preservation still fits like a glove, and hes over here trying to do an OJ like, "see it doesnt fit!!" when he half-assed putting that glove on and it was plain as day that he did 😂.