Is Roe V Wade constitutional?

Author: TheUnderdog

Posts

Total: 38
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Look at you yelling about choice. You're right it's her choice. If a man doesn't want a woman to get pregnant then he should go get a vasectomy. Because it was his choice. Do you realize the irony of it.
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,673
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
Look at you yelling about choice. You're right it's her choice. If a man doesn't want a woman to get pregnant then he should go get a vasectomy. Because it was his choice. Do you realize the irony of it.
How about some self-control instead. Not that hard. And there is no irony 
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@Dr.Franklin
They chose to get pregnant, but pro choicers think they should be allowed to choose to not be pregnant early.  Pro lifers don’t support this option.  Their claim is that a life dies, but it’s akin to letting someone on life support die.  If you think it’s wrong to let someone on life support die, then I’m presuming you support UHC.  I don’t support UHC, so if someone on life support dies, I feel good; it saves money.  I have to extend this capitalist logic to fetuses, who are as brain dead as people on life support.
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Again why is only the woman supposed to have self control the fact is abortion is legal if she has sex and gets pregnant she should be able to use abortion.
If a man doesn't want to be a father he should get a freaking vasectomy. Because it's the woman's choice to have the child or not.
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,673
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
men should have self control too
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,673
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
They chose to get pregnant, but pro choicers think they should be allowed to choose to not be pregnant early.  Pro lifers don’t support this option.  Their claim is that a life dies, but it’s akin to letting someone on life support die.  If you think it’s wrong to let someone on life support die, then I’m presuming you support UHC.  I don’t support UHC, so if someone on life support dies, I feel good; it saves money.  I have to extend this capitalist logic to fetuses, who are as brain dead as people on life support.
This is a very sick perspective. Pro-lifers don't support abortion because we affirm the right of the unborn. We affirm basic natural law created by God that serves to self-sustain the nation. Abortion is an abomination because it goes against the interests of a self-sustaining population. This is also uniquely Christian as both Jews and Satanists have child sacrifice rituals.

By saying that a fetus is brain dead similar to people and life support is very sick and shows that libertarians do not care about the soul and community of the nation. There just Mammonites. Especially when you said you feel good when someone dies on life support. You seriously need help if you think that is a legitimate position to hold. I want to take care of my people
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Religious concepts like the soul have no place in secular law.
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,673
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
the well-being then, are you happy now