The Resistance - Mission One

Author: Discipulus_Didicit

Posts

Read-only
Total: 78
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,887
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@RationalMadman
I'm not trying to exclude you from the game. I'm saying that this line of attack is not something I'm willing to get defensive about or turn around against you. It's your style. It's not mine. I don't hate you for it, but I don't have to play your game the way you want it.
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
  • Are all missions two player missions or does it vary by round?
  • Do spies know each other's id's?

Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,758
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@oromagi
I will be sticking as close as possible to the game as described in Wikipedia, including number of players in each mission.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@oromagi
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,215
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
Hi sorry I’m out of town right now, I’ll try to check in more often now.

I really don’t care who goes on the mission. The game will probably become a massive probability brain teaser imo
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,215
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Can you restate the points system for lazy people like me?
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
I think the actual site mods are the scum team.
Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,758
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@ILikePie5
Can you restate the points system for lazy people like me?
Please review post 2. If you still have any questions please try to be a bit more specific.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,215
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
2AM vibes my b
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,215
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Does the mission leader get to play too? Like if ML is a spy and he sabotages while the two companions are resistance choose resistance, would spies get a point?
Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,758
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@ILikePie5
If ML is not on the mission they will not have an opportunity to sabotage.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,215
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
Ok so the number of people going on missions changes each round 23434 in that order. So today gives us our strongest POE if it is a spy action.

I suggest going with SecretHitler tactic for this first round. Have 1 and 4 go on the missions. If it’s R yay, if it’s S, then we have POE. 25x go next with X being an agreed player
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,215
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
Scratch what I said above. After 14 go, it’ll be 41x with  X being an agreed player. If it’s resistance in R1 ofc. The less people that play the better
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
I would like Pie and myself to be the team. I encourage everybody to push for this team on the first mission.
Earth
Earth's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 3,103
3
4
8
Earth's avatar
Earth
3
4
8
-->
@ILikePie5
What? Not sure what you mean in #42.
Earth
Earth's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 3,103
3
4
8
Earth's avatar
Earth
3
4
8
-->
@RationalMadman
I would like Pie and myself to be the team. I encourage everybody to push for this team on the first mission.
Why?
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
Will future mission leaders follow the order listed in post #3?

oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
I think we should try something like

  • 1 should lead 1+2
    • if no sabotage, then
  • 2 should lead 2+1+3
    • if no sabotage, then
  • 3 should lead 3+1+2+4

ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,215
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@oromagi
I think we should try something like

  • 1 should lead 1+2
    • if no sabotage, then
  • 2 should lead 2+1+3
    • if no sabotage, then
  • 3 should lead 3+1+2+4
I think for the purpose of the game this should be fine. Only problem I see is if we ever want to make 6 ML over 1, it wouldn’t work. That’s why I suggest spreading it out so 4 can be ML and 1 can be ML with only 2-3 vote failures. Ofc if 14 is Spy then we just never put either on missions until we need a 50:50 shot later in the game. In that scenario 25x plays.
Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,758
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@oromagi
Will future mission leaders follow the order listed in post #3?

yes
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Earth
What do you mean why? I know I will pass/succeed the mission and I townread Pie.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@oromagi
I don't agree with a preset thing.

I am #4 and want to be on the team 100%
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@RationalMadman
I can't think of a reason to objectively prefer one player over another at this point, seems like following a plan designed to allow POE later in the game is the way to go.
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@Earth
I won't object to any choice you make first round.  I think you should make the team you and one other and proceed.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,215
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@oromagi
I can't think of a reason to objectively prefer one player over another at this point, seems like following a plan designed to allow POE later in the game is the way to go.
+1

I’m fine with Earth and RM per my plan
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,215
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@oromagi
Are you fine with Earth and RM?
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,215
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Earth
@Vader
@whiteflame
Y’all fine with Earth and RM?
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@ILikePie5
I don't townread Earth.
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@ILikePie5
-->@oromagi
Are you fine with Earth and RM?

yes fine

RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@oromagi
I don't townread Earth