-->
@Greyparrot
. You and DoubleR advocate for remove the cooling down period for voting and with the same breath lament the amount of people responding and voting due to "anger politics"
What do you mean "cooling down period for voting"? I'm not familiar with that phrase. And I never lamented anyone voting for any reason at all. You want to vote over anger? Go ahead! Uh oh, you voted angry and now you regret it? well, be an adult and learn the lesson not to do it next time, or don't, it's your right.
We have a right to own a firearm too but we sensibly know that removing the cooldown periods to buy one to prevent people from making long lasting snap decisions in anger would be foolish and socially irresponsible. A convenient vote in anger is even more catastrophic because the government has much more power to take life than any one individual and the impacts can last beyond any one individual's life for generations.
You probably don't mean what you're actually saying here, because one person's vote in a country of 300M people is in no way more catastrophic than one person with a gun firing out of a Las Vegas hotel window. I get what you're saying I think, that people should endeavor to educate themselves on what they're voting for. They don't. Furthermore it's unconstitutional, unAmerican and undemocratic to require them to do so. The right is very, very, very simple. You can vote for a person because they have the same middle name, or because you like their take on foreign policy, the vote counts the same, should do, and should always. Perhaps we've lost the plot a little. And frankly equating the right to vote with the right to bear arms seems quite a false equivalence to me, as in general conservative people seem to believe any legislation to control firearms at all is basically the first step toward England taking over the country. Different topic.
If you are flippant with people opting out of Democracy, I find it equally weird that you do not think it fundamentally weakens it.
How would someone taking their right to vote and deciding not to exercise it fundamentally weaken democracy? Specifically. Was I weakening democracy by not voting?
What exactly are you advocating for? What is the problem (I thought it was people not participating in voting and you definitely cited lobbyists as at least a part of the problem) you're trying to elucidate here? Is it voter participation? Is it voter awareness of issues?