It's also true that this "white supremacist" racial slur is essentially an attack on white groups in general,
Is the N word applicable to all blacks?
There is only one human race and you cannot derive differences in ethnicities such that any single group is actually superior to any other.
If a white supremacist is called a white supremacist it is in no way comparable to the emotional and sociological baggage involved in using a slur against a group. White supremacy is a social agenda not an ethnic group.
In no way ever will having your racism pointed out to you ever going to represent the same harm that practicing your racism on others does. This is not an argument it is an observation of observable reality.
If your argument has any validity it is only in the pedantic sense that anything could be used as a racial slur.
Which means that even if the term is not applied to all whities you still say it is a racial slur.
Yes
No, it’s an attack on white people who hold racist attitudes. HUGE difference.
Calling someone out on their racism is not racism.
Is the N word applicable to all blacks?
Your standard for a "racial slur" is unsupported.
Racial slur = slur against a race. Seems pretty self explanatory.
It's possible to call someone a racial slur *without* believing all people of that race are that racial slur.
Kinda just sounds like a slur at that point.
Odd caucasians are almost never the target of ethnic cleansing so I don't know who is saying this.
It's possible to call someone a racial slur *without* believing all people of that race are that racial slur.
Not all black people were slaves. Some were slave owners themselves, so the term really doesn’t hold up for them does it?
No, it’s an attack on white people who hold racist attitudes. HUGE difference.You've already conceded the argument with this statement because you described them as "white" people. If race had no bearing on this, then the (non-racial) slur would be "supremacist".
Humans can be divided into sub-species (races): The Existence of Race – The Alternative Hypothesis . I've posted this argument to you multiple times and you've failed to address it every time.
Racism is a nonsense term: Racism is a nonsense, malicious term (debateart.com) .
In no case is "white supremacist" purely descriptive. That is why when people use it, it is regarded as an insult -- no one wants to be called a white supremacist. Wikipedia probably agrees with this notion because it doesn't want 'black nationalism' to be ascribed as 'black supremacy', most likely because 'black supremacy' would be a slur referencing race (racial slur).
Calling someone out on their racism is not racism.
You've also now decided to make the claim that there is 'more difference within than between'. This argument has been debunked to death, but nonetheless here is an argument walking you through why that claim doesn't prove what you think it does (tl;dr: there are greater instances on individual genetic markers within races than between, but the total weighted effect of these genetic markers (despite between fewer in quantity between than within), produces greater genetic variance between than within): Variation Within and Between Races – The Alternative Hypothesis .
a contemptuous term for a black or dark-skinned person.
Not every whitey thinks that whities should be supreme over the non whites though. White supremacy is not a race, it is an ideology.
Could you be a bit more specific on who you do or do not call by the N word?
Humans can be divided into sub-species (races): The Existence of Race – The Alternative Hypothesis . I've posted this argument to you multiple times and you've failed to address it every time.Seems to contradict,Racism is a nonsense term: Racism is a nonsense, malicious term (debateart.com) .
People should only be self-described.Instead of trying to force a category on someone, you should ASK THEM if they identify with some proposed generalized type and or label.Forcing a category on someone (that they do not personally self-describe as) is almost always an AD HOMINEM ATTACK.
In practical terms, it doesn't matter how many or how few "genetic markers" there are.Humans cannot detect "genetic markers".And discrimination, not only based on skin-tone, but also on language and culture and religion have existed for millenia, certainly long before anyone even considered "genetic markers".
BLUE POWERPINK POWERGREEN POWER
Then you need to take a look again at history my friend
I never use the n word because it's a racial slur.
