-->
@whiteflame
I appreciate the analysis. I'd be willing to consider either lynch, but I do have to note that it's a bit odd for scum to tie their fates together so closely. If Speed did flip scum, DD would easily be the next target, since his claim is absolutely tied to Speed's. If there is no Doc in this game, then there is no need for a Doc Enabler. Much as I buy the idea that he'd play like this as scum (he did do it before, as you say), I don't think that he'd prep this fake claim with DD. That seems more half-assed than I'm willing to buy at the moment. So, if we're considering these two, I think the case you're making against Pie is more persuasive.
I don't disagree, but yeah that's why if speed is scum DD pretty much has to be is scum partner here. And there is scum equity in there interactions/ lack of interactions with each other. There are also a lot of protective roles in this game, note that DD claimed after mister chris flipped JOAT with a doc. They as scum may have expected the argument to rise that theres now 3 different protective roles if we are to believe speed. DD may have had to bite the bullet on that one to lock in for speed. So that is why it isn't that absurd to believe scum would back each other like that. on that note, pie is also accusing me of buddy locking with poly here, so at the very least if you think scum aren't likely to buddy lock you have to acknowledge the same applies to me and poly, which means the result on poly makes him look even better. If I were you I wouldn't buy into that narrative at all, I am just saying that to prove a point; if scum are willing to buddy lock in any scenario it shouldn't be dis-regarded for the other.