Um, the actual STUDIES demonstrate this fact, black people are segregated and kept in poorer places of concentrated poverty, where over policing happens, this is empirically true.
Black people make up only 8 less in rural areas than Urban areas despite the relatively small population in the rural areas. Furthermore, rural areas are easier to segregate due to their history of redlining.
Finally, the history of segregation and concentrated poverty increases the rates of crimes, further explaining the gap. Again, have some nuance.
ok that makes sense, but 60 years of reversing this and no relief? you cant blame it on racism forever.
I’m still laughing at the idea that you can just flagrantly get away with crimes in rich suburbs. Drug crimes MAYBE. But violent crimes? Those wealthy McMansion neighborhoods are among the most boring places on earth, absolutely chock full of the type of housewives who will call the cops on teenagers playing pranks and police officers who are bored stupid and would love nothing more than to investigate a violent crime. If someone think it’s even remotely possible that there is any significant number of violent crimes going unreported there they are out of their mind.
Eh.. those statistics are definitely being interpreted incorrectly on your part first of all
Definitely, a lot of crime done by white dudes specifically is let go. And... the bodies? The increasing rate of missing cases reports isn't coming up at all to you is it?
And because hispanic people weren't afforded nearly the same amount of discrimination that black people were - in the education, work, and healthcare bits, totally - but socially? They weren't slaves for hundreds of years, and there weren't jim crow laws on anywhere near the level of black people. False Equivalence.
The latest data available is from 2014. Reported crime rates for some large cities have gone up over the past two years.
Sure let's do your math: approximately if you assign white people 87% of homicide (and this is being generous to you), then they caused 18,000 deaths. If you notice all of your leading deaths deal in the range of hundreds of thousands - 18,000 is not significant enough in order to actually affect any of these numbers.
Furthermore, I never claimed that the rates of homicides were proportional to their population statistics, I am merely stating that they are generally overly represented.
I don't debate here anymore, you know that. Furthermore, you're actual reading of sources are so intellectually dishonest I'm not sure I would want to debate you if I did.
Sure bud
I don't debate here anymore, you know that. Furthermore, you're actual reading of sources are so intellectually dishonest I'm not sure I would want to debate you if I did.
I don't think there should be "policing" as it's currently practiced at all. Preventive justice is oh so ineffective.
If your('re) a gay person and you want to spend the rest of your life with another gay person, why can't you just get a civil union instead of a marriage? Marriage is a religious institution.
Because of this I think gay people should get civil unions/secular marriages so they aren't forcing the church to do something that violates their religious beliefs.
Jesus you didn't follow a single argument, lmao. I wasn't saying that white people DID commit those crimes, I was going through a hypothetical using your assertions hence, "Let's do your math", I was saying, IF white people murdered an extra 8,000 people, and those homicides weren't ever discovered, THEN it would still not impact the statistics as you seem to believe.
No, you see, I don't respect you when you blatantly engage in an intellectually dishonest manner, such as, I don't know - admitting that you cherry pick and not seeing the problem with it.
