The many debates on systemic racism in America are flawed

IS THE CONSTITUTION PART OF THE SYSTEM OF WHITE SUPREMACY?

PERHAPS A CASE CAN BE MADE FOR THAT, BUT THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FUNCTION OF THE SUPREME COURT

WHAT DOES THE FUNCTION OF THE SUPREME COURT HAVE TO DO WITH A THREAD ABOUT SYSTEMIC RACISM?

If you want government bureaucrats to be in charge of determining what human rights you deserve,

THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT WE HAVE NOW.

Not quite. The politicians who think they have the right to rule as totalitarians still have the Constitution to keep them in check. But even that can only last so long when people have no desire for freedom. Just give them their iphone and a bag of Cheetos and they'll let the government bureaucrats do whatever they want.

Do you even know what we are discussing right now?

• If the Constitution is a form of systemic racism
• And the Supreme Court is tasked with upholding the Constitution
  
• Then the Supreme Court is perpetuating systemic racism

You can't consistently argue against systemic racism and for the Supreme Court to respect the Constitution - a systemically racist document.

Ok, so what's your policy proposal ?

Ok, so what's your policy proposal ?

That question shows me you still don't know what we're discussing.

Then we shouldn't be discussing the function of the Supreme Court. We are discussing the concept of systemic racism and how it is part of larger neo-Marxist system that will lead to a totalitarian takeover.

But you seem to believe we are already under totalitarian rule because some unidentified group of politicians own the Supreme Court, and that is apparently a bad thing because you believe the Supreme Court should also respect the Constitution. But you also are arguing for the concept of systemic racism, which identified the Constitution as being a driver of systemic racism and white supremacy.

To summarize the inconsistency, let me put it in a format you may prefer:

• If the Constitution is a form of systemic racism
• And the Supreme Court is tasked with upholding the Constitution
• Then the Supreme Court is perpetuating systemic racism

You can't consistently argue against systemic racism and for the Supreme Court to respect the Constitution - a systemically racist document.

1. Neo-Marxism, which is the ideology that systemic racism is a main part of, is totalitarian.
2. You are being inconsistent.
   

Neo-Marxism

You can't consistently argue against systemic racism and for the Supreme Court to respect the Constitution - a systemically racist document.

It is the ideology from which the whole concept of systemic racism comes from.

So this, "neo-marxism" stuff is the true source of Systemic-Racism™ in Hindu culture for the past 5000 years ?

So this, "neo-marxism" stuff is the true source of Systemic-Racism™ in Hindu culture for the past 5000 years ?

No. Systemic racism, as it is most widely used in the current cultural context of the U.S.A., is part of a larger ideology that can be identified as neo-Marxism.

At it's core, it is just another attempt to create an oppressor/oppressed relationship. Just like Marxism.

If you're looking for a "true source" of the ideology of today, then Hegel would probably be the place to go. Even the term "neo-Marxism" would not exactly be accurate to describe what we are today. The term "Woke" or "Wokeness" is used now to describe the current stage we are seeing in this progression.

At it's core, it is just another attempt to create an oppressor/oppressed relationship.

And do you consider yourself a post-Hegelian ?

So would you say that "oppression" doesn't exist ?

do you believe an oppressor/oppressed relationship also exists ?