-->
@Aporia
Omg lol...who said you were bad at this game?Who told you to say that lmao.
---Star Trek Deep Space Nine (DS9) Mafia: DP1---
Posts
Total:
770
Actually this is incredibly helpful to me. I will obviously be targeting you tonight.
So just to point out, in GP's head he somehow thinks targeting Supa, which will mean he won't know his target, is a good idea. When his role self admittedly adds randomness to people who target the player he targets.
So basically, "guys i want you to know my role screws with people visiting someone, which means you gotta discount any results on that player. But now I'm gonna target someone that makes it so nobody will know who i targeted, so now every result is thrown into question!"
Nobody else is really gonna point this out?
-->
@Greyparrot
To be clear what Wyl provided was absolutely not a claim. And it was also shown that he absolutely did know the mechanics of scum group chats.
-->
@Buddamoose
Point exactly what out? Post#3?Nobody else is really gonna point this out?
lol.
-->
@Aporia
He said he was told but he didn't remember it.
-->
@Greyparrot
I think its interesting that you would take him at his word for that. Feels like a case of assuming the result and using that assumption to factor his truthfulness.
You also rarely ever OMGUS as town.
I rarely omgus period? And if ive done it as town, how would it be applicable as a conclusive meta tell anyways?
How'd you to draw this conclusion? The same way you concluded my meta is "totally different" when you've supplied just two reasons(that aren't even applicable)?
Had no idea you were actually a Jim Acosta sock account hombre 😂.
-->
@Aporia
I think its interesting that you would take him at his word for that
Odd right? He thinks im scum but doesn't factor in that means i have every incentive to paint my meta innacurately regarding what would belie me, in his view, being scum right now.
He assumed both that I would be truthful, and that i"m scum. Not wholly conflictory, just mostly.
-->
@Greyparrot
@Aporia
I don't place much faith in votes one way or the other. Just behavior. And I stand by my observation on Wylted and Grey. Aside from the one VTL both players have been unusually close to one another and quick to lend support.
-->
@Buddamoose
@Aporia
I think its interesting that you would take him at his word for that.
That is my point. The trust factor between those two is confusing to say the least.
-->
@ArgentTongue
I was sort of messing on that. Parrot voted for him kind of randomly then disappeared for a while and when he came back started tunneling budda. Yer not incorrect in yer observation at all.
-->
@Aporia
It's that the timing of the "contrived statement" was sub-optimal, also knowing that wylted has troubles and tends to drop out lends credence.
-->
@Buddamoose
So why would you blatantly OMGUS vote me?
-->
@ArgentTongue
I wouldnt necessarily say that parrots buddying is affiliation based. Its certainly concerning tho especially with his first vote and early sus on me in conjunction with Wyls seemingly transparent post about the workings of the scum PM.
-->
@Aporia
Yer way overgeneralizing early feel-out votes.
-->
@Greyparrot
Sup-optimal? As in yer saying that a better time to say it would be in the beginning but he didnt therefore it must be genuine? Host of assumptions there. The simplest explanation is that he did remember and was lying to get town cred.
-->
@Greyparrot
Where you claimed you have a useless role? The role you claimed isnt useless, it's detrimental. So how was that soft-claim accurate?
Secondly, it's regarding role, and role confirm =\= affiliation confirmed. So even if you were being truthful about that, it doesn't indicate your affiliation. I also think you miss that soft claims actually have to seriously narrow down possibilities to even matter.
Soft claims that don't, like, "my role is useless" which could be ANY number of things, don't narrow it down that much, so don't apply.
Kinda like Wylted going, "but I've breadcrumbed/soft-claimed" When his soft claim was regarding an unwritten memo only he likely knows about. Doesn't narrow anything down, so how tf is it indicative?
__________________
-->
@Greyparrot
So why would you blatantly OMGUS vote me?
The answer is already in my posts. If you can't follow why ive changed my mind that's on you.
-->
@Aporia
I go with likely over less likely.
-->
@Greyparrot
Yer way overgeneralizing early feel-out votes.
If yer referring to my thoughts on yer initial vote on me:
I thought so slightly but post #9 caught my attention. Not only did it feel aggressively rushed (you posted it less than half an hour after yer initial vote) but it was odd that you immediately appeared to have a SR by accusing me off purposely avoiding the question itself (when in reality it was just a reverse RVS on Wyls part). Feels a little more than a feel out but hey Im technically still TRing you for now.
-->
@Buddamoose
I said I have a useless night action power in post#3...that's not what you said.
-->
@Aporia
That was actually random about the timing. I admit it does look susp.
-->
@Aporia
Its certainly concerning tho especially with his first vote and early sus on me in conjunction with Wyls seemingly transparent post about the workings of the scum PM.
His reaction to dudz claim too? With what he's claiming his stated uses have been pretty much saying "I'm gonna use this in the worst possible manner". How him targeting me presents the obvious motive of throwing any results gained on me into suspicion? Then proceeds to say he's just gomna target the guy who would throw all results into suspicion?
GP has played the game a long time and fully understands anti and pro town play hombre.
-->
@Greyparrot
I said I have a useless night action power in post#
And useless =\= detrimental. Furthermore, useless again, does not really narrow anything down. All it does is provide an excuse for you not getting targeted with a NK.
-->
@Buddamoose
You're so bad masquerading as scum. Clearly you would like to reword all my posts, but it's obvious what your tactic is going to be for the rest of this game.
For the town:
Note how almost every post Buddha has made is a claim and not a question. This is scum behavior 100% on day 1.
Buddha also dodges my questions.
-->
@Buddamoose
Im of the opinion rn that Parrot has bad enough tunnel vision that he would do that.
-->
@Greyparrot
Pertaining to the claim/question distinction yer making, I think its funny you say that when the majority of his posts Dp1 of US mafia were treading lightly, buddying, and mostly useless questions.
It wasnt until Drafter outed him Dp2 that he switched to being badly defensive.
-->
@Greyparrot
Clearly you would like to reword all my posts,
You don't understand, my synopsis of what you are doing isnt rewording your posts literally. They are descriptions of what your actions and words look like when taken as a whole, and not just in isolation.
If you feel they are innacurate portrayals you are more than welcome to illustrate why. But they do largely apply and I've explained why in most every instance of done it.
Ur pointing out non-tells and trying to act like they're tells at this point. At first I was chalking it up to your reasoning generally being transparently basic, but like Seabiscuit or Secretariat, you hardcharged from the back of the pack Acosta.