False. Even the Muhammadiyah's consensus is consistent with Islam on this. For fear of having muslims led astray, you'd rather avoid the mass-circulation of literature that you deem unislamic.
- No state allows what undermines it. So? Western countries censor everything they don't want too. Malaysia doesn't have to censor what France does, the same way France doesn't have to censor what Malaysia does.
Sure, if it's physical science, it's harmless. Everything else however is banned because according to Islam, truth is on their side.
- Same thing in the West. You keep committing this circular fallacy. They think the truth is on their side, they ban what they disagree with.
Again, this nauseating pre-arranged idea of truth in the inquiry of knowledge is the most annoying part of islam. Practically, it leaves absolutely no breathing room for alternatives.
- You want to square the circle! If Islam is true, then Islam is true. It can't be true & false at the same time. It's either true or false. If it's true, then else is false. If it's false, then the truth lays somewhere else.
You're making grandiose claims about human nature again. Islam's societal practices have no common ground with western societal practices. You're looking at the west with your islamic-tinted glasses. The fact that you're assuming that human nature has this certain innate bias clearly shows a lot about Islamic society in general. It clearly disallows a different viewpoint of human nature.
- You're not really saying anything. This is a rant about nothing. What exactly do you disagree with? That humans protest injustice? That the weak follow the powerful? That decadence is the last stop to any civilization?
This is where I disagree and decided to choose a different lifestyle. For the next part of your large posts, you've said a lot about submission. I am well aware that personal whims do not override religious obligation. Well, i know that islam has been consistent on this end. As I said earlier, the fundamental issue is that i don't agree with its lifestyle. Thus, I chose the west.
- What does any of this have to do with Islam?!
I guess it's fair that taxation is theft. Again, you're inferring corruption for granted. What is it with muslims and their grandiose claims? You've claimed that western philosophy came from Islam. Yet, here, you're making mistakes as though you read none of the Vienna circles' analytic philosophers.
- Allow me to offer you a further glimpse into this story. Consider the following pieces of facts:
F1. Gustav Le Bon, a 19th century French intellectual, wrote about a story of a general sent by Napoleon to recover a Maliki book of Law titled Sharh Dardeer (which is an actual book, widely read and large Maliki reference in some 2.4 million words).
F2. Pre-1800 France had no prior legal tradition, only a couple of essays on customary laws.
F3. In 1782 Napoleon commissioned a committee to draft a French law for his nation (in the fashion of Ottoman canons). 8 years later, the committee is a failure, it gets disbanded. That same year, 1800-1801, Napoleon invades Egypt & Palestine, long story short, a million people are dead, the invasion is unsuccessful, Napoleon goes back. This time, however, he commissioned a new committee, 9 months later, a new law is drafted, called Napoleonic Law.
F4. A century later, an Azhari scholar does a comparison between 1400 articles of Napoleonic Law & Shard Dardeer. He finds there 9/10 reconcilable similarity.
- Tell me what do you say about this?
These inferences mean nothing if only to show a generalized rejection of those you deem different than you.
- You're talking about Europeans & their denial.
I'm not intending to move to the west to be a pioneer of something, I just want out of a Muslim country and read literature freely until I grow old. Malays have a simple philosophy of life. Be simple, live simple lives. Jesus, I'm not an over-zealous american hell-bent on achieving her dreams.
- What don't you read Muslim literature? Are Muslim intellectuals not available in your language?
So, me encountering Rawls' essays in a decrepit indonesian bookstore is an elaborate scheme by western countries? That's interesting. Maybe, when I have free time, I'll look up that charlatan Chomsky.
- Let me know when you find ar-Razi in a European bookstore.
I think the last part of your posts about inheritance laws seem like a rejection of my anecdotes. I think you've only offered your own rebuttal in the form of counter-anecdotes. ill read it a second time next time in case I miss anything. Once I do, expect a reply to that.
- I argued from principle, not from example. By LAW, Islamic inheritance is not allowed in the West. Going to a judge with "I want my Islamic share" is a nothing.