Should alleged rape victims be belived?

But from what we can tell: yes, men are more likely to be raped than be falsely accused of rape.
According to the most reliable data we have, the average adult man in England and Wales aged 16 to 59 has a 0.03 per cent chance of being raped over the course of a year (based on 2016-17 figures).
The best data we have — the number of people prosecuted for making false allegations — suggests that the average adult man in England and Wales has a 0.00021281 per cent chance of being falsely accused of rape in a year. (That’s based on 35 prosecutions for false rape allegations in 2011 compared to 16.5 million men aged 16 to 59 living in England and Wales at the time).
By this measure, a man is 230 times more likely to be raped than to be falsely accused of rape.

And many conservatives don't support believe women out of the fear that some are innocent.  However, most conservatives also support the death penalty even though there is a chance that some convicts are innocent.

Based on the study, the false reporting rate is at a minimum 1.5% and at maximum 90%. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation_of_rape#:~:text=DiCanio%20(1993)%20states%20that%20while,of%202%25%20to%2010%25.

So, for the tens of thousands of guys who get false accusations and are now unemployable and their families disown them, what is your message?

Wiki's numbers are all over the place, so on this issue, I don't think they are an accurate source since they aren't being consistent with their claim.

I don't think it's tens of thousands of guys every year, but I'd probably the group of falsely accused people them that it's better for them to be in jail (because rapists should get life in jail or a punishment influenced by the victims (death penalty isn't an option)) then for genuine rapists that outnumber them over 230 to one to be running free raping more people, just like it's better to have one innocent person locked up than one guilty murderer roaming free because that murderer could kill way more people than one innocent person being locked up.

If there is not enough evidence for 90% of cases, then that would mean upwards of 90% are false. 

Pretty much everybody says it is better to let guilty people roam free than to lock up innocent people.

But if you're fine with literally thousands of people having their lives ruined for doing nothing wrong

 then you'd best hope you never piss off a girlfriend really badly in the future.

I'm not donating spare change while you live on the streets.

Are you saying we should repeal the 19th Amendment?

Not necessarily; it just means there is no evidence to confirm if they are true or false.

Having 1 guilty person roam free leads to more murders.

Even though there is a trial, 4% of people convicted of murder are innocent.  Do we get rid of the death penalty on the basis of this, or is a little collateral damage inevitable in justice unfortunately?

Millions of men have girlfriends and they almost never get accused of rape by those girlfriends.  Most men who break up have pissed off their girlfriend.  This doesn't mean that their girlfriend reports them to the police over a false rape incident.

Are you saying we should repeal the 19th Amendment 😵

Hello, Based Department?

The opinion in question has to actually be based for them to take the call 

False accusation rates would be higher in a society that had believe women as law, but it also would mean more rape victims would get justice since a lot of rape victims are scared of coming out of the closet.  The experiment must be done to see if the pros of more rape victims getting justice outweighs the inevitable false accusations that will come.

"DiCanio (1993) states that while researchers and prosecutors do not agree on the exact percentage of cases in which there was sufficient evidence to conclude that allegations were false, they generally agree on a range of 2% to 10%"

"Based on the study, the false reporting rate is at a minimum 1.5% and at maximum 90%"

Um... did you just cite a study that was Wikipedia...? 

Also -actually reading the section is pretty helpful, wouldn't you agree?

and you wonder why people find you disingenious

 extremely old source, 1993... like - seriously? 

This isn't really a good source for 2021 regarding the amont of allegations that are true or false. Ya know.. cause there are more allegations now, 40 years later. 

Like your lying is so blatant that its kinda gross - rapes are reported TRUTHFULLY at between a rate of 90 and 96 percent according to the study that Wikipedia cites. 

please specifically cite the study which says that "17% of rape allegations are proven true"

d ignored that the "study" that was cited to have a "90%" false allegation rate was 1981, and from less than 20 allegations! What?

if something is reported as rape, and that report is found to NOT BE FALSE, then that thing is NECESSARILY TRUE. Again your blatant lying here is gross.