I just explained how you are wrong. Did you read what I wrote? Do you have any thoughts on it?
I disagree with your assessment.
Every medical expert who examined Floyd before and after his death made clear that he was killed by having a knee to his neck. What more information do you need and why?
"During Mr. Nelson's cross-examination, Dr. Baker acknowledged that he saw no physical signs of asphyxiation; that Mr. Floyd had a level of fentanyl in his system that could have been called an overdose in other circumstances; and that his heart condition, combined with the exertion of struggling with the police, played"
Nice dodge. The question was, do you really believe that his past, just like the past of every other black person we’ve seen die at the hands of the police, would be scrutinized the same way of all these people were white? Do you really think there would be this national effort to paint them as thugs and criminals?
I think it's common for people's pasts to be brought up, regardless of their skin color.
Whether it's politics, the criminal justice system, a job interview.
You’re just wrong on both of those. Lack of attention to personal responsibility is not as you are conveniently interpreting it, a suggestion that he/they handled the situation perfectly. It’s about the fact that if we are going to discuss responsibility we need to start with the professionals. It’s absolutely absurd that a police officer, someone who is trained, paid, and entrusted makes a mistake that kills someone, and you want to instead focus on the actions of the civilian who meets none of that criteria and carries none of that responsibility. Until people like you stop raging about silly things like your imagined national worship of George Floyd, that will and should remain the focus.
Not much I've seen in the news arguing for making more known outpatient therapy for drug addicts.
Not much I've seen in the news discussing what communities can do to help and improve themselves, in stead I see a greater interest in 'reparations.
I've 'NEVER stated I think that police should not be held accountable, should not be looked into when an incident occurs.
And no one is claiming that black people are the only ones facing any kind of hardship. Where did you get that from?
BLM
By the name, by the spoken focus.
If you were to speak of reforming the police because you feel it's become more militarized, confrontational, I'd be more apt to support.
But the message 'I see, is the police are all racist towards blacks, society needs change to suit 'us.
BLM, BLM, BLM.
There's also those odd comments by people about Communism and dismantling the nuclear family, which I haven't looked into or care much about.
BLM, is an 'idea of a social movement, 'lacking 'clear structure, accountability.
Which is 'why I have no problem identifying rioters, looters, and statue topplers as part of BLM, if they 'say they are, and spray-paint businesses.
I accept Chauvin has been found guilty, is what it is.
I'm not 'against some police reform.
Is the most you'll get from me at the moment, I expect.
