Probably because it does not exist.
The much more logical explanation is that they know what they are talking about and you lack the medical expertise to understand the autopsy report.
Fine, show me where the evidence is for their findings.
Again, your argument is that multiple medical professionals agree that Chauvin killed george. But you choose not to believe them. That isn't based on facts or information. You are just choosing to believe what you want to believe.
HB says the evidence exists, it's just not available to us peons.Meanwhile, court documents show multiple times no evidence of strangulation from the autopsies.
HB says the evidence exists, it's just not available to us peons.Meanwhile, court documents show multiple times no evidence of strangulation from the autopsies.how do you do that emote?
Nah. There wasn't evidence of drugs in his system to the point of OD'ing. Even so, the police officer knelt on his neck for 9 minutes. Even someone not doped up would probably die
Even someone not doped up would probably die.
I mean if I were to lie down on your neck for 9 minutes straight you'd still probably die even when sober.
This means that Floyd stopped breathing and his heart stopped beating (cardiopulmonary arrest) because of the injury caused by his restraint in the custody of law enforcement officers, to include asphyxia from neck compression. Asphyxia means that there is a lack of oxygen going to the brain. It can happen from obstruction of the airway, restriction of breathing from compression of the neck or chest, or the prevention of blood flow to the brain by collapsing the blood vessels in the neck. It can also happen from the replacement of oxygen in the blood by carbon monoxide, or depletion of oxygen in the atmosphere, like in a fire. "Cardiopulmonary arrest" is not a heart attack. Online sources that imply that the medical examiner is covering up George Floyd's death by calling it a "heart attack" are wrong.The death certificate's "other significant conditions" -- Floyd's natural heart disease and the presence of drugs of abuse in his tested blood -- do not excuse the officers, nor should they cause anyone to blame the victim. They are there on the death certificate because those findings, in the opinion of the medical examiner, would have made his death more likely. They are not the cause of death. The cause of death is police restraint.At the end of their press release, the Hennepin County Medical Examiner adds the following important reminder: "Under Minnesota state law, the Medical Examiner is a neutral and independent office and is separate and distinct from any prosecutorial authority or law enforcement agency." Regardless of whether experts agree with their interpretation of the evidence, they were the first to collect it, and because they did their job, that evidence is now available for public scrutiny in a court of law.
This article uses the same report you had from an actual Pathologist diagnosing the case. You are not a Pathologist
Yes however he was not acting under the influence at all. He was still able to speak and hold a conversation audibly. If you are drunk to the point of blacking out, you do not speak that audibly. I'd imagine the same with whatever drugs were found. The triggering factors was the kneeling on the neck
The triggering factor was the knee to the neck.
Not according to the Pathologist. So no I really don't think he was that delusional
No one ever said he was drunk. He was high on drugs and was clearly delusional considering he started saying he couldn’t breathe before they brought him to the ground - an actual symptom of fentanyl overdose.
Even so, the proper conduct of a police officer is not kneel down on the victim for 9 minutes straight.
