Do you really think the corporations are going to want to keep people alive if they DON'T NEED WORKERS?Uh... wut?
Do you really think the corporations are going to want to keep people alive if they are unemployed and CAN'T AFFORD TO BUY THEIR PRODUCT?
Um... no, and second of all - that... isn't that difficult to pull off - its a simple grid work. As I said, 8th grade
The rich can be so, and yet be lazy, getting no further, and in fact, can lose it. Or, the rich inherited it, and are lazy, or they earned it and became lazyOr, the rich are productive, and increase their wealth, regardless of it being inherited or personally earned.The poor can be so, and be lazy, getting nowhere, and, in fact, become poorer. or, the poor can be productive, get out of poverty by their own effort, and can even become wealthy.
Statistics do not support the claim that poor people who "work really hard" move up economically, that is a myth - furthermore statistics do not show downward trend in millionaires who do not work.
Do you mean of a sever that was filled with ARTISTS STYLES? Hm? Because that gives them more jobs, not less
I believe the simple lack of higher incidents of the succeeding poor is a personal lack, one by one:
furthermore it makes such things as "ambition" not as valuable as other traits which would help them survive
Just the experience of Ben Carson says otherwise. A wise parent can help ambition grow and results will follow. In his case, a very wise mother, who, though illiterate, yet went through the motions of checking his school work, sufficient to impress him that she cared enough to do so, and thus encouraged his ambition to flourish. What makes his experience different? Ambition, and the will to make it thrive. Who cannot do that? Only people who let their mirror dictate their failure.
idealistic and ambitious are different traits
What you described certainly was - you conflate the two
Though I suppose the two could overlap, I do think there is a difference
