Our most basic axioms

personal moral intuition

I don't have to agree with the moral correctness of an action tocapitulate

How can "objective meaning" be conditional?

How can "objective meaning" be conditional?

It’s not if it’s true.

You’ve yet to prove subjective morality.

But weren't you suggesting that "objective meaning" only exists (IFF) divine punishment and divine reward exists?

Without a perfectly unambiguous set of moral rules to follow, we must make our best subjective guess at what is morally correct (de facto subjective morality).

You’ve yet to prove subjective morality.

Yes but that doesn’t mean it’s subjective if the latter two don’t exist.

Not if your a nihilist.

I am talking about my moral intuition.

You would need to prove that some morality beyond human moral opinion exists.

I don't need objective morals to determine what kind of world I would like to live in

doesn't apply here even if you are correct.

You mean your “subjective” moral intuition. That’s in doubt so yes you have to prove it.

Where was that in my argument, do I have to quote it again for you?

That doesn’t make sense how can I be correct if it doesn’t apply?

Sure, let’s go with that.

Does the practical application of your ontology still boil down to, "always do what you think is morally correct"?

I don't need objective morals to determine what kind of world I would like to live in

When did I say you did? Please quote me.

There is no doubt that I have opinions regarding what is moral and so do you.

I'm getting a little tired of this merry go round. 

I don't have to prove that people have moral opinions

It doesn't matter what is or is not the case for a nihilist since none of us identifies as a nihilist.

And if so how does one go about thinking something is morally correct without being of the subjective opinion, right or wrong, they something is morally correct?

Great! Excellent! Glad we agree. So I don't need any objective morality to self actualize or to determine what is morally correct

Then stop making claims you can’t support, people don’t have moral opinions if you’re gonna claim they do then yes you have to prove it otherwise you leave me no choice but to dismiss the argument.

I’d like to think so but I’m not perfect.

OBJECTIVE MORALITY = WE MUST ALWAYS DO WHAT WE THINK IS RIGHT

thinking you may have room for improvement is an opinion rather than a human truism.

so whether objective reality exists or not we have opinions about morality.

OBJECTIVE MORALITY = WE MUST ALWAYS DO WHAT WE THINK IS RIGHT

What if we think different things are right?

I guess we'd have to stage some sort of pure hearted "sincere-off" battle royale or something.

genuinely obtuse.