Then every time you make your “moral” claims you’re wrong it’s that simple. Do you realize what you’re saying here? Your essentially saying your wrong about every belief you hold.
P1. If atheism is true,
our sensory perception and cognitive faculties were not designed
to fulfill a specific telos, namely, the acquisition of truth and discerning of reality as it actually is,
but rather, evolved through processes which aimed solely at the passing on of the creature's DNA.
P2. The passing on of the creature's DNA does not necessarily entail truth.
P3. Therefore the atheist's sensory perceptions and cognitive faculties do not necessarily yield truth.
P4. Therefore if atheism is true, there is no justification for believing anything to be true.
P5. We intuit some things are in fact true, and do so with proper justification.
P6. Therefore atheism is false.
because goals are intrinsinically subjective
What if you could make an objective case for the goal, like you would be unhappy for eternity if you don’t have this goal. The fact that nobody wants to be unhappy is objective.
The fact that nobody wants to be unhappy is objective
The fact that nobody wants to be unhappy is objectiveNot true, Humans are not designed to be happy, or even content. Instead, we are designed primarily to survive and reproduce, like every other creature in the natural world. A state of contentment is discouraged by nature because it would lower our guard against possible threats to our survival. The fact that evolution has prioritized the development of a big frontal lobe in our brain (which gives us excellent executive and analytical abilities) over a natural ability to be happy, tells us a lot about nature’s priorities. Different geographical locations and circuits in the brain are each associated with certain neurological and intellectual functions, but happiness, being a mere construct with no neurological basis, cannot be found in the brain tissue.
Even if all humans agreed on something, (like avoiding unhappiness) that agreement itself (argumentum ad populum) would not magically transform their opinions into FACTS.
A state of contentment is discouraged by nature because it would lower our guard against possible threats to our survival.
Nope, that is a subjective goal - you have assumptions which make you think of them as objective - your presonal increduality is not a justification for you not accepting subjective morality.
Because it's entertaining....And just to affirm....Because it's entertaining....And just to reaffirm....Because it's entertaining.
Oh... And because of the personal and variable nature of internally generated morality, I choose to regard it as subjective.
it is a perspective of human minds
The goal is a part of the syllogism, otherwise that syllogism isn't a sequitur
Even if all humans agreed on something, (like avoiding unhappiness) that agreement itself (argumentum ad populum) would not magically transform their opinions into FACTS.It’s not an opinion that nobody wants to be unhappy.
so if theirs objective proof that you should have a goal (heaven) that proof overrules any subjectivity.
Even if you consider "get to heaven" an AXIOM, there are still about eleven-zillion ways to make that happen.
Masochism makes no sense and you only know them as they are (alive).
Even if you consider "get to heaven" an AXIOM, there are still about eleven-zillion ways to make that happen.Be a good person that’s the only way I can think of.
And yet, simply because you personally don't understand it, doesn't make it stop.
And yet, simply because you personally don't understand it, doesn't make it stop.Whatever like I said you only know them as they are (alive).
Some people actually do not want to be happy.
Some people actually do not want to be happy.How do you know? And how do you know that doesn’t change if they’re in hell?
I'm not convinced any dead people "want" anything.
P1. If atheism is true, our sensory perception and cognitive faculties were not designed to fulfill a specific telos, namely, the acquisition of truth and discerning of reality as it actually is, but rather, evolved through processes which aimed solely at the passing on of the creature's DNA.
P2. The passing on of the creature's DNA does not necessarily entail truth.
P3. Therefore the atheist's sensory perceptions and cognitive faculties do not necessarily yield truth.
P4. Therefore if atheism is true, there is no justification for believing anything to be true.
P5. We intuit some things are in fact true, and do so with proper justification.
P6. Therefore atheism is false.
I'm not convinced any dead people "want" anything.Well if your right then nihilism is correct.
Maybe but it’s the only logical position there is if there is no heaven.
Is this a meaningless life?
