I don't know anything. That's your inference not my implication. I want to know something: Lunatic's role. The only information I have to give is my full claim. But I want Lunatic's first.
So, you don't know anything, but for some reason, getting a claim from Lunatic triggers your capacity to claim?
No, it triggers my desire to claim.
Something about knowing his role provides you with sufficient information to say what you are and why that matters?
We won't know his role unless he's lynched and flips or survived until the end claim. It's less knowing his role and more seeing what he claims his role is. And him deciding what to claim is important to me.
You keep saying that you'd be happy to explain something as soon as he claims, so how are you not implying that information about his role somehow clarifies something about yours or allows you to do something that you can't do without it? Maybe you don't have information, but you have a reason for doing this that you are not providing.
Yes, that would be more accurate I suppose. I don't have any game related information to provide other than my claim. My motivations and logic I have to provide as well, but it's all part in parcel.
I did see that. But his crime should then be "bribery" not "corruption." Corruption isn't a crime or a class of crimes it's just a colloquial phrase. This is my sticking point.
Not sure why the specification in his post doesn't clarify that his role is a crime, but I guess that's your interpretation, one we're not on the same page about.
My character is a crime in itself. Not a superset label of generically criminal behavior of which specific crimes are a part of. What about yours?
Right, generally you vote people as scum when you have a reason to think they're scum. What's you're reason for thinking I'm scum?
Frankly, I didn't have any strong reason to believe you were scum beyond any strong unwillingness to claim. You've doubled down on that unwillingness since I voted for you. I'm still struggling with the reason why and I think it could be justified, but I'm not seeing you justify it. I'm just seeing you continuously imply that there are justifications, and I just have to push on Lunatic to find them... somehow.
Allow me to present a hypothetical scenario. Let's say you had a messenger type role. This role allows you to give other people messages at night. Not an uncommon role here. Let's say the mod has added a twist that says only Town people actually receive the message: Scum does not. Also, you don't get any independent verification of whether your message was received.
You send a message to someone else and want to know if they received it. How do you proceed? If you full claim first, you give the game away; of course they'll say they got the message. You need them to claim first to have anything matter.
