Evidence For The Existence of God

Yes, secularism, for the most part, controls the USA. It is very intolerant to religious views.

You couldn't be more wrong. So, I have to question your motives here, whether you really don't understand what secularism is about or you're being dishonest and deceptive. 

The secularist wants him to practice his religion at home while the secularist hijacks the moral fiber of the country to a leftist/socialist position.

Theres not such thing as a secularist, its Secularism, and its meant to protect you and everyone else from religious oppression.

The secularist pretends he/she is the most tolerant person but when you look at what is going on in your country the opposite is the case.

You'll need to support that claim with evidence.

If the religionist can't practice his religion at school because the secularist will not let him how tolerant is the secularist to other views?

A school is a place of learning, NOT a place of worship. You have churches, your home and plenty of public places to pray and worship your God, yet here you are complaining about not being able to do it in schools, where people are learning things, like writing and reading and being able to comprehend concepts and ideas. Pray in your church, they don't teach math and physics there, so stop complaining.

If I want to say a prayer in public

Then, you are free to do so in many public places. You are conflating Public with Public Schools.

Clearly, you have never bothered to understand secularism or you are deliberately trying to deceive. Which is it?

Christians, in the last 80 years or so, have only been seeing things as bits and pieces which have gradually begun to trouble them and others, instead of understanding that they are the natural outcome of a change from a Christian World View to a Humanistic one; things such as over permissiveness, pornography, the problem of the public schools, the breakdown of the family, abortion, infanticide (the killing of newborn babies), increased emphasis upon the euthanasia of the old and many, many other things...The word Humanism should be carefully defined. We should not just use it as a flag, or what younger people might call a "buzz" word. We must understand what we are talking about when we use the word Humanism. Humanism means that the man is the measure of all things. Man is the measure of all things. If this other final reality of material or energy shaped by pure chance is the final reality, it gives no meaning to life. It gives no value system. It gives no basis for law, and therefore, in this case, man must be the measure of all things. So, Humanism properly defined, in contrast, let us say, to the humanities or humanitarianism, (which is something entirely different and which Christians should be in favor of) being the measure of all things, comes naturally, mathematically, inevitably, certainly. If indeed the final reality is silent about these values, then man must generate them from himself.

So, Humanism is the absolute certain result, if we choose this other final reality and say that is what it is. You must realize that when we speak of man being the measure of all things under the Humanist label, the first thing is that man has only knowledge from himself. That he, being finite, limited, very faulty in his observation of many things, yet nevertheless, has no possible source of knowledge except what man, beginning from himself, can find out from his own observation. Specifically, in this view, there is no place for any knowledge from God. [3]

It does not protect. It undermines in every way possible.

Universities are bastions of secularism where religious and conservative views are suppressed and denied.

These secularists shut down college and university campuses and bar religious or conservative speakers from exercising their First Amendment rights.

Hollywood depicts Christians as stupid, ignorant, intellectually deficient people

The Democrat position is a secular position. It squeezes God out of politics and secular ideology

The media promotes secular ideas and mocks conservatives and Christians.

It should be a place of learning, but like in many socialist societies it is used as a form of propaganda and promoting a particular worldview

A school or uniVERSITY  (unity in diversity) should be open to diversity, not discourage it. I should be able to pray in open, in recognition of my God.

The separation of church and state is not a secular philosophy except to people who reject religion. 

There is no reason why we can't apply our religious views in government.

There is no reason why we can't apply our religious views in government.

So, you have no problem with Islamic religious views ruling your government?

Yes, I do.

What I don't object to is applying laws that are common to all three monotheistic religions, such as, "Do not kill," "do not lie," "do not steal,

It does not protect. It undermines in every way possible.

Yes, it protects YOU from religious oppression. If you lived in a Theocracy, there's a good chance that people in that country can be oppressed or even killed to practice their religion. Is that what you want?

Universities are bastions of secularism where religious and conservative views are suppressed and denied.

Stop being such a dummy, universities are places of learning, not places of worship. Go to your church if you want to worship.

These secularists shut down college and university campuses and bar religious or conservative speakers from exercising their First Amendment rights.

Are they speaking about worshiping in universities? Then, they should be shut down and they can go to their church to worship.

Hollywood depicts Christians as stupid, ignorant, intellectually deficient people

Then, Christians should stop behaving that way and grow up. You are behaving that way right now, so all you do is confirm Hollywood.

The Democrat position is a secular position. It squeezes God out of politics and secular ideology

You're being ignorant again. YOUR God is not the only God to be worshiped, which is why religion is left out.

The media promotes secular ideas and mocks conservatives and Christians.

Right after conservatives and Christians say and do the stupidest things while forcing their beliefs on everyone else.

It should be a place of learning, but like in many socialist societies it is used as a form of propaganda and promoting a particular worldview

Schools? You are now showing Hollywood to be dead right about Christians. 

A school or uniVERSITY  (unity in diversity) should be open to diversity, not discourage it. I should be able to pray in open, in recognition of my God.

Once again, schools and universities are places of learning, not places of worship. Go to your church, go to your home, go to a park or public sidewalk if you're compelled to worship. The entire world was not made just for you to worship. Take Hollywood serious on this one.

Next, the majority of teachers and professors are left-leaning.

Yes, I do.

Really? Yet you just said you want to see religious views in government. Of course, you want YOUR religious views in government and not any other religious views.

What I don't object to is applying laws that are common to all three monotheistic religions, such as, "Do not kill," "do not lie," "do not steal,

There are already laws for those that don't require any religious views. Perhaps, you would like see stoning to death or cutting off hands in the streets like they do in other theocracies? 

If you look at that statistics, countries with more religious views are much higher in violent crime, so I can only assume you want to promote more violence and crime based on existing religious views?

That is very tolerant!

Next, the majority of teachers and professors are left-leaning.

The left is that natural leaning for the intelligent human.

I can be tolerant of others. Tolerant implies you believe someone else is wrong yet you still act graciously towards them.

I tolerate religious belief but only one can be true, if any, for the reason that they all contradict the others. My claim to you is that Christianity is true. 

Yes, I do.

Really? Yet you just said you want to see religious views in government. Of course, you want YOUR religious views in government and not any other religious views.

What I don't object to is applying laws that are common to all three monotheistic religions, such as, "Do not kill," "do not lie," "do not steal,

There are already laws for those that don't require any religious views. Perhaps, you would like see stoning to death or cutting off hands in the streets like they do in other theocracies? 

If you look at that statistics, countries with more religious views are much higher in violent crime, so I can only assume you want to promote more violence and crime based on existing religious views?

I can be tolerant of others. Tolerant implies you believe someone else is wrong yet you still act graciously towards them.

Yet just a few posts above you made it clear you would have a problem with Islamic religious views in your government?  You call that tolerant? I wonder what a tolerant government your religious views would make?

I tolerate religious belief but only one can be true, if any, for the reason that they all contradict the others. My claim to you is that Christianity is true. 

Yes I would suspect your claim would be that Christianity is true out of all the other religions and all the other people who followed those religions and said their religion was true and the rest were not.

So, if everyone says the same thing about their religion and everyone else religion and no religion has ever shown evidence of being true, there can be only one logical answer, none of them are true. I think you know that, too.

Where do those laws come from?

Stoning to death is not a practice of Christianity. 

I'm not pushing for a theocracy, just fair play. 

Stats from leftist states recording genocide are the worst:

The media promotes secular ideas and mocks conservatives and Christians.

Right after conservatives and Christians say and do the stupidest things while forcing their beliefs on everyone else.

I experienced God two times, and He communicated with me. He changed my consciousness to do this.

1)If no evidence is expected then there can be no evidence for or against. 

2)If evidence is reasonably expected then lack of it is evidence against existence.

"God" needs to be defined before we can determined which scenario above is applicable.

What you are describing is gnosis.

Gnosis is not considered "evidence" because of its unverifiable (personal, private) nature.

Testimonies are considered evidence sir. Learn the English language. 

Here are the media indoctrination tactics from the main news channels: