Religion should prepare us for a mentality, not faith to God

Author: Intelligence_06

Posts

Total: 166
Topic's author
#1
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
If I do equally as many things as the theist when we both are working, and I am helping the needy when the theist is praying with seemingly no effect, why does he get to go to heaven and I don't?

If Pascal's wager is a sound theory then God is a total jerk. No matter how much good I do to humanity, as long I trust myself to do everything, I go to hell. Isn't this just like Authoritarian Communism? Good things good done, but you criticize me and the punishment is equally as bad as the slacker on the hay.

I can do good things and I can help more people on sundays than the average theist because they don't work on sundays. Having the mentality of helping everything is not bad, or is it?
#2
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,346
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@Intelligence_06
Not all religious people believe that you have to believe in their faith to go to heaven.
#3
ludofl3x
ludofl3x's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,071
3
2
2
ludofl3x's avatar
ludofl3x
3
2
2
-->
@Lemming
True, my experience is most Christians will get rather uncomfortable and make all sorts of excuses on how people who aren't Christians get into Christian heaven (it's the only one, right?), none of which are consistent with the bible. None get in except through Jesus, and if you don't know Jesus, you're out of luck...sorry, kids who are born into Islam and die of some terrible illness. I bet many will do so in response to this post :). 
#4
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,673
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
-->
@Intelligence_06
If Pascal's wager is a sound theory then God is a total jerk. No matter how much good I do to humanity, as long I trust myself to do everything, I go to hell.
not neccessarily true,you would have more benefits believing in God
Topic's author
#5
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@Dr.Franklin
By no means I said that Pascal's wager is wrong, but it implies that God is probably a jerk.
Topic's author
#6
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
Pascal's wager is like I should prepare an entire ceremony if I win the lottery but I bought one scracher and the chances are 1:1,000,000. How do we know that there even is a god, and how do we know our religion is right? Exactly, We don't. We don't know whether our religion is right and believing in that god is most likely as "bad" as being an atheist. Our "religion" could be as wrong as occult, or what if occult is on the right track and Christianity is not?

I could do more things being myself and trusting my own decisions and talking myself instead of a field of conscious energy that may or may not be portrayed as a savior or a jerk. For the time needed for the gospel sang in the local church, I might have already built a whole flagpole. For the time needed for the locals to confess their sins, I might have already polished doorknobs for the entire neighborhood. By believing the wrong God, we are just making God madder and madder. Either that or God cares not at all because good people are good and bad people are bad.

If God exists, he should have told us everything. An ongoing Q&A running on thought itself. Leaving a mysterious book then punishes anyone that has any constructive criticisms to God is anything but the optimal choice if I am God. Trust me. If most intellectuals had the power to create and destroy substances and energy, then a worldly council could run this world better than a supposed "god".

The God runs the world like China right now. You are doing work? great. You are spreading my propaganda? great. You hate me based on facts? Go to hell. It is absurd that this God is even running this world like this, as if it is even possible. Just pull the power cord and let us do things ourselves.
#7
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,673
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
-->
@Intelligence_06
no God doesnt do that to good people but it is MORE PREFERABLE to believe in him than not
Topic's author
#8
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Well Pascal's wage implies that. The ideal situation is if God is totally subjective and judges one good enough for heaven just based on works instead of faith.
#9
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,673
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
-->
@Intelligence_06
no it doesnt apply any of that
Topic's author
#10
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
I could use Pascal's wager on Chinese politics

Like CCP + CCP reigns = good
Dislike CCP + CCP reigns = bad
Like CCP + CCP collapses = whatever
Dislike CCP + CCP collapses = whatever

Pascal's wager judges whether God accepts people into heaven or not solely based on if they are faithful to God, no matter how much good and evil are spent. If an extremely helpful atheist(for example, this guy) undergoes this process, then he is ending up in hell, for whatever reason. If you are defending your belief, at least give a reason.
#11
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@Dr.Franklin
not neccessarily true,you would have more benefits believing in God
Really? What benefits are there for such beliefs other than some (hypothetical/undemonstrable) reward in the (hypothetical/undemonstrable) afterlife? How does Pascal's wager point to any other benefit? It is my understanding that Pascal presented his argument solely based on the strength of infinite (hypothetical/undemonstrable) reward versus  infinite (hypothetical/undemonstrable) punishment. 

#12
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@Lemming
Not all religious people believe that you have to believe in their faith to go to heaven.
What then is the criteria for entry into heaven and what reason in that case would one have to subscribe to Pascal's wager? If the cost versus benefit of belief is not eternal torment versus bliss what exactly is being wagered?
Topic's author
#13
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
The fact is that just trusting something does not bring intrinisic benefits. However, learn to help does. I imagine being a helpful fellow is much more important than just trusting a being that isn't even provable. Now use it on here.

Suppose: God welcomes all that do more good than bad

Do good + God exists = Heaven
Do bad + God exists = Hell
Do good + God doesn't exist = People thank you
Do bad + God doesn't exist = People hate you

I think it is the best to do things that is good for this life. Religion is possibly teaching us to be positive. In that case, we should find fun being in hell too considering those with strong willpower will remain sane in the long mundane lockup from day 1 to day 3650. Judging a ticket to heaven based on belief is implying God is a jerk, and he should not be a jerk, whatsoever. I know God does not do that and should not.


#14
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,346
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@secularmerlin
What then is the criteria for entry into heaven and what reason in that case would one have to subscribe to Pascal's wager? If the cost versus benefit of belief is not eternal torment versus bliss what exactly is being wagered?
Well, I suppose I had a bit of tunnel vision, and focused on the non-Christians going to Hell part, rather than the Pascal's wager part.

My family, as I take it view Christianity as the best path to living a 'good life, to being closer to God.
But I don't think they see it as a requirement to entering Heaven.
They have faith in a kind, loving, understanding, God, who possesses knowledge beyond their ken
That will in some manner answer for all that has occurred bad in the world,
That in some manner even the lost or fallen of humanity will be brought back into the light.,
Not dammed to some eternity of fire, smoke, darkness, and suffering.
Afterlife being a vague and mysterious thing, what.
I think they have faith that good people, even without faith in God, will be brought into the fold,
Even people who deny Gods existence.

They also don't profess to judge people's fate after,
Let God sort them out so to speak, I think.
#15
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@Lemming
If faith in the existence of some god(s) is not necessarily a requirement for entry into heaven what are the actual criteria and how have you determined them?
#16
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,346
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@secularmerlin
It's me Leaning from DDO, I'm not religious, Merlin.
I just dislike religious fellows being propped up as strawmen, or stereotyped all together into unfeeling Hell threaten'ers.
I'm fond of my family members who are religious, and a number of the religious people I grew up knowing in life.
#17
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@Lemming
I am not offering any strawman. I am only addressing Pascal's Wager and the flaws in the argument. (IF) the criteria for entry into some afterlife cannot be determined (THEN) any argument concerning entry into said afterlife becomes by necessity an argument from ignorance. 
#18
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,346
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@secularmerlin
Oh I don't think you or Intelligence_06 is straw manning religion.
As I said, just a bit of tunnel vision on my part.

Devils Advocate though, I don't see why Pascal's wager would have to 'only refer to the Christian religion.
Plenty of folk who aren't religious, but instead spiritual, that might believe in some afterlife, and what karma might await them there.
Human's 'do often fear/respect karma.
As evidenced by the many different beliefs that 'have humans after death's effected by it.
#19
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@Lemming
 I don't see why Pascal's wager would have to 'only refer to the Christian religion.
That is actually one of its flaws not one of its strengths. No matter what religion presents the argument also presents a false dichotomy. Believing isn't enough if it is your argument that one must believe in the "correct" god(s) in order to receive the reward proposed. 
#20
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,346
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@secularmerlin
Living or trying to live a righteous life, seems to me a decent way to cover all of the bases.
All one has to believe in is 'some sort of reckoning, based upon their actions on Earth.
And perhaps some people would only live a decent life, by dint of believing there was 'something more after death.
Wouldn't 'have to be a specific religion, I'd think.
#21
Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,615
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@Intelligence_06
If I do equally as many things as the theist when we both are working, and I am helping the needy when the theist is praying with seemingly no effect, why does he get to go to heaven and I don't?

If Pascal's wager is a sound theory then God is a total jerk. No matter how much good I do to humanity, as long I trust myself to do everything, I go to hell. Isn't this just like Authoritarian Communism? Good things good done, but you criticize me and the punishment is equally as bad as the slacker on the hay.

I can do good things and I can help more people on sundays than the average theist because they don't work on sundays. Having the mentality of helping everything is not bad, or is it?

Christians, indeed all believers in a god believe themselves to have the monopoly on morals. Put simply, if one doesn't believe in god and have  faith then then  they are believed to be  incapable of living a life with morals  and an  upstanding life .  Haughty doesn't even cover it, does it.

#22
SirAnonymous
SirAnonymous's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,140
3
7
10
SirAnonymous's avatar
SirAnonymous
3
7
10
-->
@Stephen
Christians, indeed all believers in a god believe themselves to have the monopoly on morals. Put simply, if one doesn't believe in god and have  faith then then  they are believed to be  incapable of living a life with morals  and an  upstanding life . Haughty doesn't even cover it, does it.
As a Christian who knows a lot of other Christians, I cannot think of even a single one who believes that non-Christians are incapable of having morals or living a moral life.
#23
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,346
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@secularmerlin
Some Christians supported the Taiping Rebellion, as it encouraged a 'form of Christianity.
Though I'm doubtful myself that such is the answer,
Doesn't seem worth it to spread a distorted message of one's religion.
Similar problem in my eyes is just giving people free Bibles, what with there being context needing explanation and what.

Can't say I disagree with Intelligence_06 on Religion should prepare us for a mentality, not faith to God.
But eh, I'm an atheist.
#24
SirAnonymous
SirAnonymous's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,140
3
7
10
SirAnonymous's avatar
SirAnonymous
3
7
10
-->
@Stephen
You just painted 84% of the world with the same brush and essentially called them all moral prigs.
Topic's author
#25
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@SirAnonymous
r-really? 84% of people are of no religion?


#26
SirAnonymous
SirAnonymous's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,140
3
7
10
SirAnonymous's avatar
SirAnonymous
3
7
10
-->
@Intelligence_06
No, other way around. 16% are of no religion, 84% are affiliated with a religion.
#27
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,346
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@Intelligence_06
Per Wikipidia
"Irreligion (adjective form: non-religious or irreligious) is the absence, indifference to, or rejection of religion.[1] According to the Pew Research Center's 2012 global study of 230 countries and territories, 16% of the world's population is not affiliated with a religion, while 84% are affiliated.[2]"
Topic's author
#28
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
That sounds more like it.
#29
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,673
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
-->
@secularmerlin
a sense of community and purpose
#30
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@Dr.Franklin
You don't actually need religion for that.