Mexicans are rapists.
Protesters are terrorists.
Democrats are traitors.
They are not Americans
The are, ask the Democrat mayor of Olympia.
Just the ones who willingly or unwillingly support an UnAmerican Marxist transformation of the country.
The only Tribe Trump believes in is the American Tribe.
ok. the american "proles" rose up and seized power from the british.
there are lots of mexican-americans.
More like the American bourgeoisie told Britan to go pound sand. You are so confused lol.
There are way more illegal Mexicans from the tribe nation of Mexico. They are distinctly not American.
Why do I keep finding evidence that history is not your friend? 622 BNCE, Muhammad, tired of being persecuted in Mecca, migrated to Medina. That city asked him to be their leader; he accepted. "During his 10 years in Medina, Muhammad became more than just a spiritual leader. He put his administrative and political skills to good use, effectively acting as the town’s leader… Islam was evolving from a religious movement to a powerful political one."
Calling Mexicans rapists is divisive.
People from Mexico cross the border illegally and rape. Mexico is not America.Trump is not a Mexican President.
"poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids"
You're delusional if you think legal Mexican immigrants care about the Mexico tribe anymore. There is a reason why they are here legally. To join the American tribe.
Many legal immigrants from Mexico identify as Americans and will vote again for Trump.
The only Tribe Trump believes in is the American Tribe.
And less than 1/3rd of latinos support trump according to that source.
It's entirely plausible 1/3 former Mexicans recognize that illegal immigrants to America from Mexico include rapists.
Trump will never be a Mexican president.
There is only one party that hyphenates the American tribe into warring competing factions and that is the divisive Democrat party.Even you were quick to toss in the hyphenated American term so flippantly.
Every hyphenated attack on America is dividing the nation, as the left loves to do.
Yeah, it's amazing what happens when brown-skinned people are allowed to identify as Americans and not some hyphenated tribe.
Yeah, it's amazing what happens when brown-skinned people are allowed to identify as Americans and not some hyphenated tribe.
It's so weird how people cling to the obviously racist party that constantly injects skin color and foreign nationalities into every political policy.It's OK to be American.
that is completely unamerican. America, along with the rest of the western world, is a secular state. A division of church and state is critically important.
I am a history buff. No one in the history of the world has ever been perfect. Everyone has their flaws. Everyone has done things that are wrong. If we can only have monuments to people who are perfect, there will be no monuments. I think that, as a society, we can have a real conversation about what things we value and what we want to memorialize.
there were 2 major points that make the comparison between washington and mohommad a poor one.1) one of these people is politician, the other is a religious leader. So banning Mohammad is overtly religious act, while taking down statues of washington is just a political one.
Only if you are arguing that it is a "secular" state meaning "not a religious theocracy".
"In God We Trust" is our official country motto.
Heck, school prayer wasn't even banned until 1962.
This secularization of the country has been a major push by lefties for a little less than a century.
But, history says Muhammad was ALSO a politician. That's what it was about. Not such a poor comparison
no, i mean secular. As in a separation of church and state.
and every citizen can trust any god they want to.
ok. but it is banned and has been for over 50 years.
secularization has been pushed in most modern countries. Because having a country where religion is involved in the state creates serious problems.
Don't be silly. For a start, one is tolerant the other isn't. Have a guess which one isn't?lol, no. Countless atrocities have been carried out for Christianity. Muslims were usually much more tolerant of other faiths inside their borders. Christians relentlessness attacked, suppressed or expelled religious minorities.
Muslims were usually much more tolerant of other faiths inside their borders
No, wrong again. One is about blind submission and the other isn't. Have a guess which one isn't?well since they both are, there is no point in guessing.
Me neither, but you have ignored the uncomfortable fact that blacks rounded up other blacks and sold them to the highest bidder.i don't understand how I could ignore something that is completely irrelevant.
No one is talking about building statues to them, so how could what they did be at all relevant to a conversation about statues?
