which conservatives were right in the LGBT civil rights supreme court case?

hate speech is a made up bs term, but content that wouldn't be permitted in Canada would be permitted in the U.S. because of the constitution so....

the U.S. citizens have a God given right to free speech/press, a right the government must recognize, does Canada?  or is Canada's freedom of the press given to them by the government?

the U.S. has overreaching interference from the state?  any examples to back up that claim?

Freedom of the press is not construed as an absence of interference or outside entities, such as a government or religious organization...

Freedom of the press or freedom of the media is the principle that communication and expression through various media, including printed and electronic media, especially published materials, should be considered a right to be exercised freely. Such freedom implies the absence of interference from an overreaching state;

the list of censorship examples doesn't help your case, they get overturned in court because of the constitution, unlike Canada's hate speech laws.

Nevertheless, freedom of the press in the United States is subject to certain restrictions, such as defamation law, a lack of protection for whistleblowers, barriers to information access and constraints caused by public and government hostility to journalists.

Article 5 isn't something where countries can just go meh. It's binding to all member nations. This means that an attack on one NATO member nation is an attack on ALL. The US attacking Canada would be a declaration of war to every single NATO member. 

Also, if the US were to invade Canada, it would instantly become a pariah state. Its trustworthiness on the global state would vanish, and almost every single country on this planet would immediately place embargoes on it. The US economy would completely collapse. And when I said 28 nations, I was just referring to those in NATO. Other countries would also join in (as they would see the US as a threat), and pretty soon it would be WWIII, with the US on one side and everyone else on the other.

But lemme guess, you guys think the US would still win 🤣

America is already a pariah state. We might as well do the crime if we already did the time.

There are no inalienable rights in Canada.
A legal right is a claim to a benefit. The law sets legal rights, and the courts will enforce them if no one else will. 

What good is a right if the government can scrap it? That’s where a constitution comes into play. It’s a superlaw that tells the government what laws it can and cannot write. And it’s very difficult for the government to change the constitution. The Canadian Charter is the part of our constitution that orders the government to respect certain human rights.

The Charter promises us this safety, but it doesn’t really deliver. There are several loopholes in the Charter that let the federal parliament, provincial legislatures, or the courts take away rights.

If the government can justify this law as reasonable “in a free and democratic society,” it can get away with it

Yup, Luxembourg is gonna send it’s troops to fight against the Americans.

NATO countries can’t do anything without the US. If we withdrew from NATO every single country would have to deal with the Russians. Have fun with that.

That wasn’t the premise. In a 1v1 the US would crush Canada. If you disagree with that then you’re ignorant or you need help lol.

Yup, so is everyone else.

You guys would too. Have fun with that.

A 1v1 US-Canada War would very quickly turn into another Vietnam, or Iraq, or Afghanistan – except a lot closer to home.

Also, why are you basing outward superiority solely on military might? Ever heard of soft power?

Also, it's best to let Canada dissolve naturally if it continues to elect soy leaders. Then the USA can walk in without any resistance.

How long did Saddam last with a military 10 times the size of Canada's? All it takes is a leader willing to use extreme force.

Operation Desert Storm (17 January 1991 – 28 February 1991)

привет русский агент

Really? Hmm let’s see would the Russians come after us first or Europe? We have nukes. Russia has nukes. You on the other hand 😬

Irrelevant. We’d defeat your military easily. We’d take Ottawa within a month. You couldn’t do the same in a 1v1 with minimal external influence. Just admit it, American military is far superior in technology and numbers compared to Canada. 

Canada doesn't have anything like libel laws?  do you know what they are and what they do?  I'm quite frankly shocked. 

Your link shows the U.S. has whistle blower protections.

Cases that are proven to violate the constitution are overturned there are thousands of cases you can read.

Schenk v. United States (1919)

Freedom of speech can be limited during wartime. The government can restrict expressions that “would create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.”

Debs v. United States (1919)
The First Amendment did not protect an anti-war speech designed to obstruct recruiting

Morse v. Frederick (2007)
The First Amendment did not protect a public school student’s right to display a banner reading “Bong Hits 4 Jesus”. While students have the right to engage in political speech, the right was outweighed by the school’s mission to discourage drug use.

(just to name a few)

so your not going to deny my points on hate speech, I mean you could have just admitted it but that would be expecting too much I guess.

the fact that your government can restrict your speech like that is really all that needs to be said, you don't have a right to free speech because it's been restricted and could be further right?  why not?  hate speech is vague, abstract etc  since your government is defining it they can further define it, what's to stop them? 

it speaks for itself, I guess you wanted me to read up on the charter because you didn't understand it?  you don't have rights, you have privileges granted to you by the government subject to change by the government.  Maybe you don't understand the difference between that and the U.S. constitution?

When the [Canadian] government has limited an individual's right, there is an onus upon the Crown to show, on the balance of probabilities, firstly, that the limitation was prescribed by law namely, that the law is attuned to the values of accessibility and intelligibility; and secondly, that it is justified in a free and democratic society, which means that it must have a justifiable purpose and must be proportional.

the incorporation of section 1 in the Charter proves that freedom of expression, which is a basic right, may be limited when its exercise causes harm to the public interest or the rights of others.

что

Yup, cuz we all know nukes are the only determinant of strength. It's not like Russia would invade the US through subtler means.

Does that make the US superior to Canada overall?

They’re welcome to try.

If we can destroy your government and destroy your industry without breaking a sweat? Definitely. The nation that can cripple another nation is inherently advanced and therefore superior.

Я думаю, что у них уже есть, товарищ

Yup, cuz military strength automatically means superiority. I guess North Korea would be superior to South Korea as well.

Again, what do you consider hate speech? Because there are obviously things that shouldn't be said in a public forum.

 that the law is attuned to the values of accessibility and intelligibility; and secondly, that it is justified in a free and democratic society, which means that it must have a justifiable purpose and must be proportional.

 Charter proves that freedom of expression, which is a basic right, may be limited when its exercise causes harm to the public interest or the rights of others.

Laughable.

Ya about that 😬

https://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing.asp

Kinda like the 45th president of the US, lol.

Did I touch a nerve? Sorry.

Ok? My main point still stands.

Looks like you can’t read like me