you misunderstand. I don't care what they identify as. they can believe they are a martian for all I care. If they do not meet the requirements to be the thing they claim they are, then they are not that thing.
Really great way of changing people's minds oh wait you are going to tell me you don't care about that as well expect preach to people who already agree with you?
sorry, in the context of your sentence I had thought you were referring to free as in the cost of an item.
"Nothing is free so there is no chance ever for a "true" democracy."
Do you want to answer that?
You aren't going to be able to get through to delusional people
Literally everyone at a certain or currently have been delusional or are delusional. If you actually cared about your issues you wouldn't be dismissing so many people because you need support and if you don't get it what are you going to start a revolution or something?
We can work on convincing the majority of americans that this is what the republicans are about so that they don't manage to succeed
So majority of Americans are not delusional, how much would you say are? Percentage or stats from a source would be fine
1) no election has a "public vote" every vote is private.
Public vote refers to the public being able to vote not everyone can see who voted for what. What is this other public vote you are talking about and where has it ever been used?
2) that is exactly what a jury is. They are a representation of society, IE a jury of your peers. They then vote on whether or not you are guilty.
So your telling me Israel and Palestine will agree with who is picked?
between 2 individuals, sure. Between nations there is no court for that. We do have bodies such as the UN that could very easily pass resolutions on the matter if the US didn't always block them.
Then it isn't theft. Both sides will have to agree on the same laws in order for whatever body that represents it to make that case. If you want to say under US standards then sure but under a standard they both agree then that isn't the case.
again, with the UN, sanctions etc we don't need Israel to agree they are stealing. Everyone else sees they are stealing and want it to stop. We can take steps to make them stop even if they don't agree.
Israel has the backing of the US. The UN won't do anything when the US supports Israel. That isn't even talking about theft which it isn't since Israel or Palestine haven't been tried for their country actions.
lol so pointing out how silly your question is being anti-intellectual? I think you just can't stand it when people don't immediately agree with you.
Projection. Almost everyone on this site disagrees with me yet you think I can't stand anyone who disagrees with me? Please prove the opposite as in I am cozy with people who agree with me or if you can actually explain your point instead of giving a 1 line response.
you think that people who are dirt poor and fighting for their lives can be tariffed into surrendering? The Israeli's have been blockading Palestine for years, it only hardens their resolve to keep fighting.
Lol is this some anime where Palestine has a Goku who wins in the end? In reality people can take too much and die. An improve in resolve doesn't matter since it is not about who is suffered more it is about who has the better weapons. Israel does and the amount of resolve Palestine has wouldn't do anything to a bullet to the head.
Israel holds all the power in the relationship. They are occupying the land, they have way more weapons and the US as their backer.
You already understand it but still spoke about resolve as if that mattered.
Investment would be for private businesses to do. If the US is able to negotiate a stable framework for peace, then that kind of investment will likely come.
The framework of peace would be an investment and that would span a long time, I think longer than 4 years so enough time for another president to ruin it.