Why was JESUS such a PERVERT?!

Author: BrotherDThomas

Posts

Total: 70
BrotherDThomas
BrotherDThomas's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 2,140
3
3
7
BrotherDThomas's avatar
BrotherDThomas
3
3
7
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit


.
Discipulus_Didicit,

Why? Barring your "confusing manner" statement relative to my style which is not present in the first place, it is because that is the true MO of the Brother D. on the internet religious forums for the past 30 years, that's why!  

But, at this juncture I am being ordered to calm down the Brother D's true form of presenting Jesus' true words and following 2 Timothy 4:2, which may get to the point of me having to be too sterile and humdrum. We'll see.

.

Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,758
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@BrotherDThomas
YOUR CONTINUED ODD USE OF COMMUNICATION:




.
Discipulus_Didicit,

MY RESPONSE:

Yeah that is my name, ppl already know I am the one you are referring to in that post because you tagged me. The artificially inserted white space is weird too. Mopac also does that and never told me why when I asked.
BrotherDThomas
BrotherDThomas's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 2,140
3
3
7
BrotherDThomas's avatar
BrotherDThomas
3
3
7
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit


.

Discipulus_Didicit,

You do it your way, and I'll do it my way in addressing an individual within these forums. It is as simple as that.

.
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
--> @BrotherDThomas

YOUR INTENTIONALLY COMEDIC AND CONFUSING MANNER OF SPEAKING:

YOUR [INSERT WORDS HERE] QUOTE:

MY RESPONSE:

Dude, why?
ROFL!

There does that otherwise missing great sense of humor again! 

Funny.


Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,758
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@ethang5
I don't often make jokes, but when I do... I prefer Dos Eq-

Er, no that's not right. Let me try again.

I don't often make jokes, but when I do...

No, no the moment passed just give up.

ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Lol!

That post was amazingly easy to read.

I wonder why?

I'm beginning to suspect your humor may pass over most of the masses here.



Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,758
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@ethang5
It often does yes. Damn shame, that. There is also the fact that most of my posts are genuinely humorless. When I see the opportunity for a well timed joke (such as post 65) or something funny just randomly pops into my head (such as post 60) then I generally take the opportunity but opportunities don't always present themselves and as this is a debate site rather than a comedy site I am not often inclined to create them myself.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,081
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Mopac
You chose to overlook every valid point that I made previously. Which is your prerogative of course.

Though somewhat narrow minded and overly defensive for a debater perhaps. Especially when the typicality of you response is taken into account.
That is to say; the same old jargon which only has meaning relative to a particular set of conditioned data.

 Data with only a 2000 year old myth as evidence. 



ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
It often does yes. Damn shame, that.
I'm aghast that I may have missed some of your humour because it is so subtle.

I am not often inclined to create them myself.
Our loss.
Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@zedvictor4
My motive is to point you in the right direction, and that only.


The right direction is to go with how the church understands and uses scripture.

It should be evident that there is no end to the amount of creative extrapolation one can get from scripture. That being the case, correct interpretation belongs to the church. If you are against the church, your points cannot be valid.