-->
@Greyparrot
But as we've pointed out repeatedly, a lynch does more to help survivors survive than no lynch. Consider this:
Secondly, I think a VTL is worth the risk. To demonstrate why, let's examine the possible outcomes of a VTL.1. We kill an SK (2/11 chance, since you know you aren't one). This is good because fewer players die each round and because it makes both mafia and town closer to winning, and therefore brings we survivors closer to winning.2. We kill an SK target (1/3 chance). This would disable an SK since they would lose their ability to kill. Combining 1 and 2, we have a 51.52% chance of either killing or disabling an SK. This would not bring us closer to fulfilling any wincons, but it would still be useful since fewer players would be killed each round.3. We kill a town/mafia (1/3 chance, but this could overlap with SK targets). This would be useful because it would bring the other party closer to winning.4. We kill a survivor who wasn't targeted. This would be bad because it wouldn't bring us closer to winning, wasting a valuable lynch. The odds of this are difficult to calculate because it's possible (so far as I know) for the town or mafia to be SK targets. However, I think it is safe to assume that anywhere from no town and scum to 1 town and 1 scum (probably less) would be targeted. This would make the odds of killing a non-targeted survivor range from 1/6 to 1/3.Outcome 4 is the only one that is bad for survivors. Thus, VTL'ing, even randomly, gives us anywhere from a 2/3 to 5/6 chance of a positive outcome. I think that is worth it.
Stating a truism without explaining how a vtnl helps you survive is not a very good answer.