Even if that were true, so what? Everything in the whistleblower complaint has already been confirmed by the white house. Even if that information was 2nd hand, it all turned out to be true so what does it matter?
He claimed there was quid pro quo, and according to the released document there wasn’t. White House has not confirmed quid pro quo. And if you think “I’m concerend about Biden and the DNC cause Durham is looking into it, maybe you could look into this” is asking for political help and quid pro quo, we merely have a difference of opinion on semantics
That is unclear still. We don't know what trump said in that call because we don't have a transcript yet. There were also other calls made to ukranian officials before trump's call. Even if trump didn't say it personally, it is entirely possible he had one of his lackies make clear to them in a separate call that they needed to do Trump a favor to get their money.
Oh so now Trump told someone to do it. This conspiracy theory and based on zero fact. You’re putting up a bunch of what if questions that are not grounded in any type of fact whatsoever. Anyone can say “oh I think so and so said this and that” but the burden of proof is on you to prove it did happen and until then the status quo is supreme.
This has nothing to do with the topic at all. It is also a conspiracy theory that has no basis in reality.
So you deny the fact that Trump was being watched and the fact that the warrants were funded by the DNC fo do that? There’s congressional testimony to the contrary. Stop listening to CNN and look at the objective facts.
You would hope so. But then why did trump withhold the money? This also relies on the republicans actually siding with Ukraine over trump. If trump decided he didn't want to give them the money, he would find some loophole to withhold it. And even if he couldn't stop the money forever, he could make sure the republicans never passed anything else to help Ukraine. Crossing trump could cost him american support for the remainder of Trump's term, which would be a big thing to lose. He has motive to stay on trump's good side, and nothing to gain by crossing him.
I answered this question earlier and so did Trump. The government changed so a review was being done to ensure the money would be used wisely and not given to someone who shouldn’t have it. And once again you come up with what ifs. The fact is you think Zelensky is lying and there’s no objective way to prove that. Your analysis lies a assumptions and what ifs, not facts.
No one. Biden didn't make the decision. It was a policy supported by the EU, the UN, the UK, oh and it had bipartisan support from both democrats and republicans in the US. Biden was just the one that actually went to Ukraine and carried it out. It wasn't Biden's idea and he didn't make the decision.
Have you even watched the video. He was boasting about how HE got this done. And once again, neither the US, nor the U.N., nor the UK have any authority in matters of Ukraine. If this were the case it would be a gross violation of the sovereignty of a nation. You can say, oh he should be fired. That’s an opinion grounded in possible fact. But you can’t withhold aid and demand they stop investigation (they did, the investigation wasn’t restarted)
He literally cannot be charged or convicted while he is in office. There are likely charges pending for him when he leaves office though.
Yes, he can be charged via Impeachment and convicted by the jury in the Senate followed by criminal prosecution after removal.
1) they have. The impeachment has already started. that is what this topic is about.
2) The reason it took so long is that Pelosi was afraid that impeaching trump might have a political cost and she is a coward.
1) No they haven’t. There has not been an official Impeachment vote in the House. This is an impeachment inquiry, short for we don’t know anything and it’s possible this could be a Nothing burger but to please out base we’re going to do it
2) Pelosi is a coward. She knows Democrats are done if they vote for impeachment because this won’t go well for them back home in the districts of moderate Dems.
