We can never really know anything

How is monism de facto?

Monism is all is one. De facto means it is wrong.

Care to explain what I am getting wrong? 

If it doesn't exist, it isn't God. It must exist in order to be God. That is why it isn't just wrong to say God doesn't exist, it is stupid and indefensible.

If it doesn't exist, it isn't God.

It must exist in order to be God.

That is why it isn't just wrong to say God doesn't exist, it is stupid and indefensible.

The purpose of a definition is to clarify what is being discussed.

The definition I am giving you of God is "The Ultimate Reality" which is in line with what the church teaches. Besides that, it is the definition you will find in Merriam-webster's collegiate dictionary. The Oxford uses "Supreme Being" which means the same thing.

Your entire argument is to say that God is something other than this. Thus, you aren't talking ahout the same thing but you act as you are .

You have a non-argument. 

And it isn't about me being true. It is about God being true, because God is The Truth. You cannot make an argument that The Truth is a lie. That there is no Truth. If you say, "There is no truth", you undermine your own assertion.

Of course you know this, because you admit that reality exists. That is why you must make God something other than God to have an argument. Otherwise, your argument would amount to, "Prove to me that it is true that there is truth! Ha! You can't! I win!".

And even this whole appeal to epistemological nihilism is a cover. It isn't that you don't know, it is that you know better(in your own reasoning). It is something that comes from pride, even though to the undiscerning it might look like humility. "Oh, he doesn't know". But you aren't simply saying "I don't know." You are saying that nobody can know(because you know better). You are also asserting that God doesn't exist.

So do you know God doesn't exist? Not at all. You don't even know what God is. You are uneducated, and because you are an unteachable know-it-all who can't stand the idea of not being the smartest most well informed person in the room, you in your pride must knock everyone down to your level. You fancy yourself scientific. But I tell you, if you were in. a room of engineers, they would laugh at you for trying to impress them with your nonsense, and tell you to take your know nothing bullshit to the dirty pot smoking drum circle kids by the river, who might actually be impressed if they weren't as arrogant as you are.

Based on very simple logic we can deduce that even a non-monism cosmos would (does) act EXACTLY like a Monistic cosmos.

What do you mean here? 

We wouldn't know the difference? 

 Simple consciousness as an occupied space Universe made of three occupied space parts;
Me, you and line-of-relationship and is based upon inherently induces otherness ergo awareness via line-of-relationship and triangulation as structural integrity if not also coherence as a wholistic set.

O = me or this quanta

O = you or another quanta

----   = line-of-relationship  between me and you ex O----O or as (o)(o) wherein the geodesic enclosure of me and you is connected as a geodesic { Space }

........ = macro infinite non-occupied space as background for the the three occupied space parts.

Most cannot even grasp this simple explanation for consciousness much less a more complex consciousness.

Just for Mopac's benefit, perhaps instead of discussing the existence of God we could discuss the existence of a cosmic entity that answers prayers, decides of the fate of dead people and gets upset if you kiss some one of the same sex.  For convenience we can refer to that entity as Jeremy.

Yes, I am calling you uneducated, and I further assert that you have no idea what you are talking about. I don't see our conversation as being fruitful, because you are simply averse to God. You do not approach this subject reasonably. 

You are wrong. But I am not going to convince you of that. Besides, you aren't fun to talk to. You aren't very polite.

Based on very simple logic we can deduce that even a non-monism cosmos would (does) act EXACTLY like a Monistic cosmos.

What do you mean here? 

We wouldn't know the difference? 

Things that exist are detectable.  Things that are not detectable do not exist.

Microwaves and radio waves and such were at one time undetectable. Yet they existed before they were.

I don't think "fundamentally seperate" is a proper way to describe supernatural.

Before these waves were detected, they were not likely considered at all.

Can you make what you said simpler?