-->
@Mopac
Observable you know science.What do you consider evidence?
Observable you know science.What do you consider evidence?
You are wanting me to scientifically prove that when wr use the word God, we are referring to The Ultimate Reality?
God is good is an assumption
This is not evidence. Do you understand that? I did ask for it remember.If there is no ultimate reality, that means nothing is real. Clearly you are having an experience, which soundly proves there is some form of existence(reality). The position that there is no ultimate reality or God is self defeating and untenable.
I said it is an assumption since theists believe God exist.
Yeah that is my position from theists insufficient argument and what I can't fill in for their bad arguments.Yes. I know. You have also said it is an assumption that god is good.
I have suggested that the book of the theist itself proves them to be wrong when I stated all the above.
I am not denying anything. You simply don't understand what evidence is. Do you also have a different definition evidence as well?Your denial of evidence does not negate evidence.
Existence itself is the evidence for God. To say there is no ultimate reality is an untenable position. It is patently foolish.
Of course you can't tell me that God doesn't exist. This is obviously a fallacy.
If you say there is no ultimate reality, you are saying there is no truth. Obviously, this makes you a liar.
Atheism is certainly the embrace of arbitrariness. Nihilist dipshittery.